•   5 min read

How to effectively organize the work of a cross-functional team of 100 people — the case of Arsenal Insurance

The Arse­nal Insur­ance team con­sists of about a thou­sand peo­ple with divi­sions all over Ukraine. The head office employs over 150 peo­ple in more than 10 depart­ments — includ­ing lawyers, financiers, accoun­tants, pro­gram­mers, and spe­cial­ists in var­i­ous fields.

Each team man­aged projects in their own way. Align­ing shared tasks took a lot of time and required con­stant clar­i­fi­ca­tions. Thanks to the migra­tion of all teams to Work­sec­tion, the com­pa­ny opti­mized inter­nal process­es and com­mu­ni­ca­tion with con­trac­tors. Cus­tom task sta­tus­es and tags orga­nized the col­lab­o­ra­tion of cross-func­tion­al teams.

About the Company

Arse­nal Insur­ance is one of the lead­ing insur­ance com­pa­nies in Ukraine. It ranks in the top 5 by the size of insur­ance pre­mi­ums among all non-life insur­ers in Ukraine.
The com­pa­ny has been oper­at­ing for 20 years and has over 350,000 clients — from indi­vid­u­als to large businesses.
Start­ing in June 2025, it will be #1 in the mar­ket for CAS­CO by the size of insur­ance premiums.
The vol­ume of insur­ance pay­outs exceeds 7 mil­lion UAH daily.
Annu­al turnover — 5 bil­lion UAH.
It has phys­i­cal offices in 29 cities across Ukraine.

Request

Before imple­ment­ing Work­sec­tion, each depart­ment of Arse­nal Insur­ance used var­i­ous tools for project man­age­ment. One team pre­ferred to work in chats, anoth­er in Excel, and a third com­mu­ni­cat­ed via email. This com­pli­cat­ed inter­ac­tion and coor­di­na­tion among teams.

The head office of the insur­ance com­pa­ny has tasks that require simul­ta­ne­ous involve­ment of dif­fer­ent teams. Each has its own area of respon­si­bil­i­ty that needs to be com­plet­ed, approved, and hand­ed over to the next department.

For exam­ple, the com­pa­ny under­goes an audit and receives com­pli­ance cer­ti­fi­ca­tion. Lawyers pre­pare doc­u­men­ta­tion, the finance depart­ment com­piles reports, and the IT depart­ment adapts the infra­struc­ture to new require­ments. At every stage, it is impor­tant that the infor­ma­tion is trans­mit­ted cor­rect­ly and promptly.

With­out a struc­tured work­flow, this turned into end­less clar­i­fi­ca­tions about team pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. The com­pa­ny also fre­quent­ly involves exter­nal con­trac­tors, whose tasks need to be monitored.

The pri­ma­ry request of Arse­nal Insur­ance was to unite all teams in the head office and exter­nal con­trac­tors in a sin­gle project man­age­ment system.
When you have one task as the core that breaks down into sub­tasks with dead­lines, bud­gets, and so on — it’s con­ve­nient” — Kostyan­tyn Pala­zov, CDO of Arse­nal Insurance

Client Chal­lenges

Syn­chro­niza­tion of Cross-Func­tion­al Teams

Prob­lem: New require­ments from the mar­ket reg­u­la­tor affect­ed the oper­a­tions of all insur­ance com­pa­nies. Adapt­ing to these require­ments caused exten­sive changes. The changes affect­ed all depart­ments — from lawyers to devel­op­ers. Thus, there arose a need to unite dif­fer­ent teams into joint large tasks for imple­ment­ing changes.
Much of the oper­a­tional work involves adjust­ing busi­ness process­es. All tasks and changes need to be man­aged in one place” — Kostyan­tyn Pala­zov, CDO of Arse­nal Insurance
Man­agers need­ed to see the progress of depart­men­tal work. The lack of account­abil­i­ty based on cur­rent data com­pli­cat­ed plan adjust­ments and decision-making.

Solu­tion: The com­pa­ny grad­u­al­ly con­nect­ed var­i­ous depart­ments of the head office to Work­sec­tion for col­lab­o­ra­tive work. A Work­sec­tion man­ag­er con­duct­ed a per­son­al con­sul­ta­tion for depart­ment heads. The meet­ing helped adapt the sys­tem to busi­ness needs.

We quick­ly reviewed the prod­uct in half an hour. We under­stood how the sys­tem works quite eas­i­ly. We wrote down instruc­tions for the rest of our col­leagues” — Kostyan­tyn Pala­zov, CDO of Arse­nal Insurance
After that, each depart­ment began to cus­tomize their work­space accord­ing to their needs. Teams added cus­tomized sets of sta­tus­es, set up tags to indi­cate work areas, and began to cre­ate tasks. This helped struc­ture cross-func­tion­al process­es and sim­pli­fy inter­ac­tion between departments.

All depart­ments of the insur­ance com­pa­ny tran­si­tioned to Work­sec­tion. As a result, it became easy and quick to coor­di­nate com­plex tasks and respond prompt­ly to changes in projects.

Cus­tomiza­tion of Work Processes

Prob­lem: Teams worked with­out defined stages. It was dif­fi­cult to track which tasks were in progress, which were await­ing approval, and which were com­plet­ed. This led to con­fu­sion and slowed down team work.
Solu­tion: The imple­men­ta­tion of cus­tom sta­tus­es helped struc­ture tasks from imple­men­ta­tion to out­come eval­u­a­tion. Now each team has its own set of sta­tus­es. The use of sta­tus­es in con­junc­tion with fil­ters sig­nif­i­cant­ly sim­pli­fied nav­i­ga­tion. Teams can sort tasks by types, assignees, and deadlines.


Col­lab­o­ra­tive Teamwork

Prob­lem: Each team used its own tool for work. Infor­ma­tion about projects was scat­tered between emails, chats, and doc­u­ments, which cre­at­ed addi­tion­al chaos. Dif­fi­cul­ty in coor­di­nat­ing process­es between depart­ments ham­pered decision-making.
Many small and large tasks. One team can work simul­ta­ne­ous­ly on sev­er­al projects. This cross-func­tion­al­i­ty requires a flex­i­ble tool to mon­i­tor progress in one place” — Kostyan­tyn Pala­zov, CDO of Arse­nal Insurance
Solu­tion: Stor­ing infor­ma­tion and updates on tasks in one place. Now every employ­ee has a list of tasks with dead­lines. Each man­ag­er can review the sta­tus of all depart­ment tasks in just a few minutes.

Dis­cus­sions about work are tied to spe­cif­ic tasks, and access to infor­ma­tion is con­trolled by man­agers. For exam­ple, con­trac­tors and part­ners see only the data rel­e­vant to their work.

All tasks, dis­cus­sions, and files are stored in one place. You can always quick­ly find what you need, rather than end­less­ly search­ing for files in var­i­ous chats” — Kostyan­tyn Pala­zov, CDO of Arse­nal Insurance

Orga­ni­za­tion of Work with Contractors

Prob­lem: Using chats in com­bi­na­tion with Google Sheets for com­mu­ni­ca­tion with con­trac­tors instead of a sin­gle tool. Tasks would get lost in mes­sages, and the sta­tus of works need­ed to be con­stant­ly clar­i­fied manually.
Solu­tion: Trans­fer­ring work with con­trac­tors to Work­sec­tion and using Kan­ban to track the progress of work.

What it looks like:

This way, it’s easy to find all tasks that are in progress or await­ing execution.
All our con­trac­tors work through Work­sec­tion. Even IT com­pa­nies that use Jira or oth­er tools with­in their teams” — Kostyan­tyn Pala­zov, CDO of Arse­nal Insurance

Orga­nized Accountability

Prob­lem: To check the remain­ing bud­get and the sta­tus of annu­al plan exe­cu­tion, a lot of time was spent search­ing for infor­ma­tion from var­i­ous sources. This com­pli­cat­ed process monitoring.
Solu­tion: Export­ing data from Work­sec­tion to Excel helped struc­ture task plan­ning for the year and allo­cate bud­gets by projects. This made it easy for man­agers to keep track of the exe­cu­tion of the annu­al plan and quick­ly adapt to changes.

Thanks to this, it is now pos­si­ble to:
  • Track progress on each project.
  • Ana­lyze which bud­gets have been exe­cut­ed and which need correction.
  • Make time­ly deci­sions: increase the bud­get, sus­pend part of the work, or change priorities.
If a busi­ness has many par­al­lel projects, it’s dif­fi­cult to man­age all process­es with­out Work­sec­tion. It’s a nec­es­sary tool for con­trol­ling dead­lines and mon­i­tor­ing exter­nal con­trac­tors” — Kostyan­tyn Pala­zov, CDO of Arse­nal Insurance

esc
Share
или
PM school
Task managers have become an integral part of team work. According to data from Cloudwards, small businesses spend an average of $8.9 per user per month on such services, while the average spend is about...
9 September 2025   •   9 min read
PM school
Modern teams spend too much time on communication — not always effective. According to data from Grammarly, an average of 7.5 hours a week is wasted just exchanging information through chats, emails,...
27 August 2025   •   8 min read
PM school
Opacity of processes is one of the main reasons for chaos in teams. Managers spend time on endless status clarifications, employees work without understanding the full picture, and clients get lost in...
5 August 2025   •   9 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂