•     •   5 min read

What mistakes do companies make when implementing Worksection? Top 7 mistakes and solutions

There is a per­cep­tion that imple­ment­ing a project man­age­ment sys­tem goes smooth­ly. How­ev­er, in real­i­ty, Com­pa­ny A might suc­cess­ful­ly inte­grate the sys­tem, while Com­pa­ny B might not. Why does this happen?

The first obsta­cle could be team resis­tance. Anoth­er issue could be not under­stand­ing how to struc­ture the work­flow with­in the new sys­tem. Instead of gain­ing a clear pic­ture of projects, you end up with new chaos and uncer­tain­ty on how to tame it.


Start­ing with Work­sec­tion is a new phase in orga­niz­ing team­work. There­fore, onboard­ing the sys­tem comes with its chal­lenges. We’ll explore the most com­mon ones and pro­vide prac­ti­cal advice on how to smooth­ly tran­si­tion to a team­work man­age­ment system.

List of com­mon mis­takes at the start of work­ing with Worksection 

Prob­lem #1 — Man­age­ment does not explain why the team needs the new system

The deci­sion to intro­duce a new tool is made by the company’s man­age­ment. Usu­al­ly, man­age­ment also tests the tool before its direct implementation.

Dur­ing the famil­iar­iza­tion peri­od, an approx­i­mate idea of the future work­flow emerges. There­fore, it might seem suf­fi­cient to just add the team to the new sys­tem for a suc­cess­ful start. And here aris­es the first prob­lem: the lack of expla­na­tion of the sys­tem’s val­ue to the team. The team does­n’t under­stand the val­ue of the changes you’re proposing.

Solu­tion

Explain why the com­pa­ny needs the new sys­tem. Talk about its ben­e­fits and con­ve­nience. Here are a few of them:


Addi­tion­al­ly, devel­op and pro­vide instruc­tions for employ­ees on how to work with the new ser­vice. Briefly explain the sys­tem’s struc­ture, how to set and check their tasks, etc. This will give con­fi­dence and an under­stand­ing of how to work with the new tool.

Prob­lem #2 — Resis­tance from the team

Even after pro­vid­ing an expla­na­tion and a clear step-by-step guide, man­age­ment might still face team resis­tance. Why?

Pro­duc­tive employ­ees will oppose changes to an already estab­lished work­flow. Less pro­duc­tive ones will con­scious­ly avoid reveal­ing that they are not putting in the required efforts at work. Thus, any change to an estab­lished work­flow caus­es pain. And this must be managed.

Any change to an estab­lished work­flow caus­es pain. 

Solu­tion

Find a way to encour­age the team to use the ser­vice. This could be a bonus sys­tem dur­ing the onboard­ing peri­od or anoth­er type of moti­va­tion. For exam­ple, we and our clients use a sim­ple rule: if a task is not in Work­sec­tion, it doesn’t exist.

Employ­ees devel­op a cer­tain excite­ment for check­ing their task lists. Depart­ment heads, in turn, start set­ting tasks more respon­si­bly. Isn’t this a win-win?

Prob­lem #3 — Lack of gen­er­al work rules

It’s cru­cial to tai­lor the sys­tem’s capa­bil­i­ties to your busi­ness’s needs. With­out this, you will only scale work chaos.

Solu­tion

To do this, you need to form an algo­rithm and a set of work rules with the sys­tem. For instance, how dif­fer­ent busi­ness­es can orga­nize their work in Worksection:
  • Mar­ket­ing agen­cies: Plan and man­age mar­ket­ing cam­paigns. Col­lab­o­rate on con­tent cre­ation with writ­ers, design­ers, and editors.
  • IT com­pa­nies: Man­age soft­ware devel­op­ment projects with tasks, time­lines, and stages. Coor­di­nate releas­es and soft­ware updates.
  • Dig­i­tal agen­cies: Col­lab­o­rate with clients on project require­ments and feed­back. Effec­tive­ly allo­cate resources among the agen­cy’s ongo­ing projects.
  • Law firms: Pri­or­i­tize tasks relat­ed to court cas­es and client needs. Track bill­able hours for clients.
  • Archi­tec­ture bureaus: Plan archi­tec­tur­al projects, main stages, and time­lines. Allo­cate resources, includ­ing work­force and materials.
  • Man­u­fac­tur­ing busi­ness­es: Plan pro­duc­tion process­es and sched­ules. Col­lab­o­rate with sup­pli­ers to receive raw mate­ri­als on time.
  • Con­struc­tion busi­ness­es: Orga­nize schemes, per­mits, con­tracts, and oth­er doc­u­ments in one place. Man­age spent time and oth­er resources for accu­rate billing.

Prob­lem #4 — No one is respon­si­ble for imple­ment­ing the system

One of the key prob­lems in exe­cut­ing any task is the lack of respon­si­bil­i­ty. With­out some­one over­see­ing the sys­tem’s imple­men­ta­tion, swift and effec­tive inte­gra­tion won’t happen.

Solu­tion

The respon­si­ble per­son­’s task is to adhere to the agreed plan, time­ly iden­ti­fy and make changes to the process, and report on progress. There­fore, choose an employ­ee who will be respon­si­ble for imple­ment­ing the ser­vice and will:
  • Mon­i­tor employ­ee involvement;
  • Uni­fy sys­tem work rules;
  • Con­vey all nec­es­sary infor­ma­tion about the work to the team.

Prob­lem #5 — Com­mu­ni­ca­tion out­side of Worksection

Work chats are imprac­ti­cal. Impor­tant infor­ma­tion often gets lost, and it’s dif­fi­cult to track the pro­jec­t’s dynam­ics. Work­sec­tion is designed to make work com­mu­ni­ca­tion as effec­tive as pos­si­ble, avoid­ing unnec­es­sary chaos.

Solu­tion

Thus, dur­ing the ser­vice inte­gra­tion, we rec­om­mend trans­fer­ring all work dis­cus­sions to Work­sec­tion. One of the rules should be con­duct­ing all busi­ness com­mu­ni­ca­tion with­in the sys­tem. This will not only help suc­cess­ful­ly inte­grate the ser­vice but also sig­nif­i­cant­ly improve the qual­i­ty of the workflow.


Prob­lem #6 — Lack of active man­age­ment involve­ment in integration

This one’s quite sim­ple. If the man­age­ment does not use the ser­vice, how can they expect their team to?

Solu­tion

The best encour­age­ment to work in the new sys­tem is demon­strat­ed through your own exam­ple. Man­age­ment should be the first to par­tic­i­pate in test­ing and sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly use the ser­vice. Share insights with sub­or­di­nates and work togeth­er to find the most effec­tive ways of build­ing work that suit your business.

Prob­lem #7 — Try­ing to trans­fer the entire team to the sys­tem at once

Do not add the entire team to the sys­tem from the first days of use. The more employ­ees you have, the more ques­tions about the work­flow and mis­un­der­stand­ings you will encounter.

Solu­tion

First, add a test team to the sys­tem to test work with­in the first project. Appoint a man­ag­er respon­si­ble for inte­gra­tion. This will also help pol­ish the gen­er­al work rules with the sys­tem. After this test mode, begin scal­ing the results and invite the whole team.

To sum­ma­rize

To suc­cess­ful­ly imple­ment a project man­age­ment sys­tem, you need to:
  1. Explain to the team why the com­pa­ny needs these changes.
  2. Find a way to encour­age the team to use the service.
  3. Build an algo­rithm and a sys­tem of rules for work­ing in the new system.
  4. Appoint some­one respon­si­ble for integration.
  5. Trans­fer all busi­ness com­mu­ni­ca­tion into the system.
  6. Demon­strate the need to use the ser­vice by example.
  7. Cre­ate a test team to test the service.

esc
Share
или
PM school
Time is ticking, budgets won’t wait, and your team might be spread across different time zones. This is a familiar situation for any company where precise time tracking is critical. Clockify remains a...
20 June 2025   •   8 min read
PM school
Linear has long earned a reputation as a fast, uncluttered issue-tracker loved by developers for its clean interface and handy shortcuts. Still, by 2025 many teams need more flexibility, richer visualization...
20 June 2025   •   7 min read
PM school
For years GanttPRO was viewed as the “gold standard” of visual planning, yet in 2025 companies increasingly look for a GanttPRO alternative that offers more flexible pricing, richer collaboration, and...
20 June 2025   •   7 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂