•     •   7 min read

Just-In-Time (JIT): Always on Time

As with lean man­u­fac­tur­ing phi­los­o­phy, the Just-In-Time con­cept emerged as part of the Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion Sys­tem. Japan­ese com­pa­nies pio­neered this approach, and soon, West­ern com­pa­nies began adopt­ing it.

Hewlett-Packard

Hewlett-Packard

The famous Hewlett-Packard became one of the Amer­i­can pio­neers in imple­ment­ing Just-In-Time.” Using JIT in its four sub­sidiaries (Gree­ley, Fort Collins, Com­put­er Sys­tems, Van­cou­ver) increased labor pro­duc­tiv­i­ty (by 100% in Gree­ley) and the amount of shipped prod­ucts (by 20% in Van­cou­ver) and reduced pro­duc­tion cycle time (by 50% in Fort Collins).

His­to­ry of JIT

Toy­ota was the first to use the Just-In-Time” con­cept as part of its busi­ness mod­el in the 1970s. It took over 15 years to per­fect the method­ol­o­gy, which became a sig­nif­i­cant part of the com­pa­ny’s man­age­ment, along­side lean manufacturing.

The pre­req­ui­sites for using the Just-In-Time con­cept are root­ed in the post-war peri­od. Three fac­tors influ­enced the devel­op­ment of this new pro­duc­tion philosophy:

  • Finan­cial Cri­sis and Lack of Cash Flow: Made it impos­si­ble to finance large-scale inven­to­ry pro­duc­tion meth­ods (as was cus­tom­ary in the US).
  • Lack of Space in Japan: There was not enough space to build large fac­to­ries and ware­hous­es for pro­duc­tion and storage.
  • High Unem­ploy­ment: Mean­while, Japan­ese work­ers’ wages were sig­nif­i­cant­ly low­er than those of their Amer­i­can coun­ter­parts, and female labor was val­ued 40% less than male labor.

Toy­ota seemed to have per­fect­ed its mechan­ics over a cou­ple of decades. How­ev­er, for Just-In-Time to work per­fect­ly, sev­er­al con­di­tions must be met:

  1. Sta­ble production
  2. High­ly skilled personnel
  3. No break­downs at plants
  4. Reli­able suppliers
  5. Fast set­up and recon­fig­u­ra­tion of machin­ery respon­si­ble for the final assem­bly of cars
The vio­la­tion of one con­di­tion almost led to a com­plete col­lapse of the method­ol­o­gy in Feb­ru­ary 1997. A fire at a brake pro­duc­tion plant sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduced the out­put capac­i­ty of P‑valves for Toy­ota cars.


The com­pa­ny was the sole sup­pli­er of these parts, and the plant clo­sure for sev­er­al weeks could have dis­rupt­ed Toy­ota’s sup­ply line. Because Toy­ota only sent orders for parts when it received new orders from cus­tomers, the stock of P‑valves ran out in one day. Pro­duc­tion lines halt­ed for two days until the sup­pli­er could resume assem­bling the nec­es­sary parts.

Oth­er Toy­ota sup­pli­ers also had to stop work since the automak­er did not need oth­er parts due to pro­duc­tion down­time. The fire at one plant cost the com­pa­ny about $15 bil­lion in lost prof­its and 70,000 cars due to a two-day downtime.

In the West, the use of JIT was first learned about in 1977 thanks to two articles:

  • A. Ash­burn’s The Famous Ohno Sys­tem’ of Toy­ota” (named after busi­ness­man Tai­ichi Ohno, con­sid­ered the father of lean production)
  • Y. Sug­i­mori’s Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion Sys­tem and Kan­ban: Mate­ri­al­iza­tion of Just-In-Time and Respect-for-Human Systems.”
From the 1980s, the basics of Just-In-Time began to be applied by com­pa­nies in the US and oth­er devel­oped coun­tries. Fujio Cho’s pre­sen­ta­tion (lat­er Pres­i­dent of Toy­ota Motor Corp.) at the Inter­na­tion­al Head­quar­ters of Ford in Detroit in 1980 great­ly con­tributed to the the­o­ret­i­cal inte­gra­tion of the con­cept into pro­duc­tion. In it, he detailed the fea­tures of Toy­ota’s pro­duc­tion sys­tem and empha­sized the advan­tages of JIT and the Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion System.

A notable and con­ta­gious exam­ple of the suc­cess­ful appli­ca­tion of the Just-In-Time” method­ol­o­gy at the time was Omark Sys­tems (now Blount Inter­na­tion­al, Inc). They cre­at­ed a mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the con­cept called ZIPS (zero inven­to­ry pro­duc­tion sys­tem), which increased pro­duc­tiv­i­ty by about 35%.

Richard Schon­berg­er in his book World Class Man­u­fac­tur­ing Case­book: Imple­ment­ing JIT and TQC” uses a sur­vey quote from a com­pa­ny employ­ee as proof of the method­ol­o­gy’s effectiveness:

Labor pro­tec­tion has become much bet­ter. Pre­vi­ous­ly, we could work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, fol­lowed by a long break. Too often, we worked on parts that weren’t need­ed. Now we’re more occu­pied with work­ing on nec­es­sary parts”.
Fur­ther impe­tus for the study and use of Just-In-Time was giv­en by Daniel Jones and Daniel Roos’ book The Machine That Changed the World”

What is Just-In-Time and Why Does Your Com­pa­ny Need It?

Just-In-Time” or JIT is a pro­duc­tion sys­tem where only the items need­ed by con­sumers are pro­duced exact­ly when need­ed and in the required quantity.

This approach is dia­met­ri­cal­ly opposed to mass pro­duc­tion. Two key dif­fer­ences are:

  • Mass Pro­duc­tion: Items are pro­duced in large batch­es, stored, and deliv­ered to con­sumers when an order is received.
    JIT: Pro­duc­tion occurs as orders come in.
  • Mass Pro­duc­tion: Focus­es on pro­duc­ing one type and spec­i­fi­ca­tion of prod­uct in large batch­es.
    JIT: Focus­es on small batch­es of diverse products.
How­ev­er, the JIT con­cept can­not be mechan­i­cal­ly adopt­ed. Tran­si­tion­ing to it requires a new approach to plan­ning and reg­u­lat­ing pro­duc­tion, as JIT is based on cus­tomer orders. It is also nec­es­sary to ana­lyze the need to expand the staff and func­tions of cus­tomer ser­vice oper­a­tors and change the lay­out of equipment.

Dell

DELL

A notable exam­ple of Just-In-Time imple­men­ta­tion is Dell. Michael Dell chose the path of direct sales, where PC assem­bly began only after an order was placed. This deci­sion allowed the com­pa­ny to start installing Pen­tium 4 proces­sors almost three months ear­li­er than HP, as there were no large quan­ti­ties of unsold pre­vi­ous-gen­er­a­tion CPUs in stock!
Loss­es are an ele­ment of the pro­duc­tion process that increas­es costs and adds no value.

DRIFT Con­cept as an Exten­sion of Just-In-Time Ideas

DRIFT stands for Do It Right the First Time. This con­cept emerged fol­low­ing JIT in the 1980s. It involves set­ting up process­es and sys­tems so that the sales depart­ment receives prod­ucts from pro­duc­tion only once, but with­out the slight­est error.
DRIFT poten­tial­ly reduces pro­duc­tion costs by elim­i­nat­ing the need to redis­trib­ute excess inven­to­ry or man­age con­sumer returns.
The essence of the con­cept is sim­ple: Every­thing pro­duced has zero error probability.
This means every­thing com­ing off the con­vey­or is done right the first time. Risks of rework­ing and cor­rec­tions dis­ap­pear, along with the loss of brand reputation.

To imple­ment the DRIFT method­ol­o­gy, it is nec­es­sary to link sys­tems, process­es, and man­age­ment levers into a sin­gle whole to reduce the risk of errors to zero on the first launch. Check­lists can be very help­ful in this.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, there are no stud­ies on DRIFT in the CIS coun­tries. Mean­while, it is even applied in the US Army: Chief War­rant Offi­cer Caleb Kitrell imple­ments three DRIFT strate­gies in his division:

  1. Under­stand the high cost of mak­ing mistakes.
  2. Lead­ers con­stant­ly mon­i­tor and go to places where sol­diers are less like­ly to make mis­takes and waste time.
  3. Active­ly work on elim­i­nat­ing short­com­ings and help com­mand imple­ment solutions.

Advan­tages and Dis­ad­van­tages of JIT

Advan­tages:


  • Main­tain­ing Com­pet­i­tive­ness: Bet­ter meet cus­tomer needs while reduc­ing costs (par­tic­u­lar­ly in stor­ing fin­ished goods).
  • Flex­i­ble Response to Demand Changes: Pro­duc­tion is geared for quick recon­fig­u­ra­tion. No prod­uct accu­mu­la­tion means no obso­les­cence in warehouses.
  • Short­er Pro­duc­tion Cycle: Besides the obvi­ous ben­e­fit of pro­duc­tion speed, it ensures a quick return on invest­ment in production.
  • Resource Release: Can be direct­ed towards pro­duc­ing oth­er prod­ucts or com­plet­ing tasks pre­vi­ous­ly lack­ing bud­get and time.

Dis­ad­van­tages:

  • High Depen­den­cy on Sup­pli­ers: Find­ing sup­pli­ers geo­graph­i­cal­ly close to your pro­duc­tion facil­i­ties or capa­ble of quick­ly sup­ply­ing nec­es­sary mate­ri­als is crucial.
  • Pos­si­ble Increase in Mate­r­i­al Costs: Order­ing small batch­es of parts increas­es their cost.
  • Labor Vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty: Attempts to prompt­ly react to sup­ply and demand con­di­tions lead to the spread of non-tra­di­tion­al labor reg­u­la­tion mech­a­nisms (con­tracts, temporary/​project work).
  • Some­times Cheap­er to Store Goods: Par­tic­u­lar­ly rel­e­vant for small busi­ness­es or pro­duc­tion with sup­pli­ers in anoth­er region/​country.
  • Increased Trans­porta­tion Costs: Goods are deliv­ered as need­ed, not stored in a ware­house and issued from there.
  • High­er Require­ments for Project Man­age­ment: With­out an estab­lished work­flow, work­er down­time is like­ly. A per­son­al task man­ag­er is indispensable!
  • Increased Vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty to Eco­nom­ic Dete­ri­o­ra­tions: For exam­ple, fuel price spikes will sig­nif­i­cant­ly impact logis­tics costs, thus reduc­ing pro­duc­tion profitability.

TOP‑5 Use­ful Lit­er­a­ture on JIT

Pri­mar­i­ly, the Just-In-Time con­cept is con­sid­ered an ele­ment of kan­ban or lean production.

Here’s our top‑5 book list focus­ing on this system:

  1. The Machine That Changed the World: The Sto­ry of Lean Pro­duc­tion — Toyota’s Secret Weapon in the Glob­al Car Wars That Is Now Rev­o­lu­tion­iz­ing World Indus­try” by James Wom­ack: A best­seller that sig­nif­i­cant­ly boost­ed the study of lean pro­duc­tion and Just-In-Time. First released in 1991, the lat­est edi­tion was in 2007.
  2. Just-in-Time for Oper­a­tors”: A kind of JIT for Dum­mies.” All ele­ments of the Just-In-Time sys­tem are laid out, with struc­tured infor­ma­tion and numer­ous foot­notes explain­ing terminology.
  3. Kan­ban and Just-in-Time at Toy­ota: Man­age­ment Begins at the Work­place” by Tai­ichi Ohno: Since it was pre­pared by Toy­ota spe­cial­ists, this source can be trust­ed. The book con­sists of train­ing mate­ri­als pre­pared for Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion Sys­tem sem­i­nars in the 1970s.
  4. Do It Right the First Time: A Short Guide to Learn­ing From Your Most Mem­o­rable Errors, Mis­takes, and Blun­ders” by Ger­ard I. Nieren­berg: A guide to iden­ti­fy­ing and reduc­ing the num­ber of errors in work and life.
  5. Just-in-Time: Mak­ing It Hap­pen: Unleash­ing the Pow­er of Con­tin­u­ous Improve­ment” by William A. San­dras: This book focus­es on imple­ment­ing Just-In-Time in pro­duc­tion, cov­er­ing sup­pli­er and con­sumer inter­ac­tion, devel­op­ing a func­tion­ing Kan­ban sys­tem, and inte­grat­ing JIT with oth­er tools in production.

Ver­dict

The Just-In-Time con­cept sat­is­fies three con­sumer desires: high prod­uct qual­i­ty, rea­son­able cost, and quick order delivery.
Apply­ing the Just-In-Time sys­tem is a pow­er­ful tool for elim­i­nat­ing pro­duc­tion process losses. 
It enhances com­pa­ny com­pet­i­tive­ness by pro­duc­ing a wide range of prod­ucts at low cost, good qual­i­ty, and a short pro­duc­tion cycle.

esc
Share
или
PM school
Specialized project management software has become essential for law firms. Legal practices benefit from these tools by streamlining case management, ensuring compliance with legal standards, and enhancing...
30 September 2024   •   12 min read
PM school
In 2024, engineering firms require robust project management tools to handle complex workflows, resource allocation, and tight deadlines. The right project management software can help engineering firms...
30 September 2024   •   10 min read
PM school
Nonprofits operate with limited resources and tight budgets, making efficient project management essential for success. Project management software can help nonprofits streamline operations, manage volunteers...
30 September 2024   •   11 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂