•     •   7 min read

Just-In-Time (JIT): Always on Time

As with lean man­u­fac­tur­ing phi­los­o­phy, the Just-In-Time con­cept emerged as part of the Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion Sys­tem. Japan­ese com­pa­nies pio­neered this approach, and soon, West­ern com­pa­nies began adopt­ing it.

Hewlett-Packard

Hewlett-Packard

The famous Hewlett-Packard became one of the Amer­i­can pio­neers in imple­ment­ing Just-In-Time.” Using JIT in its four sub­sidiaries (Gree­ley, Fort Collins, Com­put­er Sys­tems, Van­cou­ver) increased labor pro­duc­tiv­i­ty (by 100% in Gree­ley) and the amount of shipped prod­ucts (by 20% in Van­cou­ver) and reduced pro­duc­tion cycle time (by 50% in Fort Collins).

His­to­ry of JIT

Toy­ota was the first to use the Just-In-Time” con­cept as part of its busi­ness mod­el in the 1970s. It took over 15 years to per­fect the method­ol­o­gy, which became a sig­nif­i­cant part of the com­pa­ny’s man­age­ment, along­side lean manufacturing.

The pre­req­ui­sites for using the Just-In-Time con­cept are root­ed in the post-war peri­od. Three fac­tors influ­enced the devel­op­ment of this new pro­duc­tion philosophy:

  • Finan­cial Cri­sis and Lack of Cash Flow: Made it impos­si­ble to finance large-scale inven­to­ry pro­duc­tion meth­ods (as was cus­tom­ary in the US).
  • Lack of Space in Japan: There was not enough space to build large fac­to­ries and ware­hous­es for pro­duc­tion and storage.
  • High Unem­ploy­ment: Mean­while, Japan­ese work­ers’ wages were sig­nif­i­cant­ly low­er than those of their Amer­i­can coun­ter­parts, and female labor was val­ued 40% less than male labor.

Toy­ota seemed to have per­fect­ed its mechan­ics over a cou­ple of decades. How­ev­er, for Just-In-Time to work per­fect­ly, sev­er­al con­di­tions must be met:

  1. Sta­ble production
  2. High­ly skilled personnel
  3. No break­downs at plants
  4. Reli­able suppliers
  5. Fast set­up and recon­fig­u­ra­tion of machin­ery respon­si­ble for the final assem­bly of cars
The vio­la­tion of one con­di­tion almost led to a com­plete col­lapse of the method­ol­o­gy in Feb­ru­ary 1997. A fire at a brake pro­duc­tion plant sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduced the out­put capac­i­ty of P‑valves for Toy­ota cars.


The com­pa­ny was the sole sup­pli­er of these parts, and the plant clo­sure for sev­er­al weeks could have dis­rupt­ed Toy­ota’s sup­ply line. Because Toy­ota only sent orders for parts when it received new orders from cus­tomers, the stock of P‑valves ran out in one day. Pro­duc­tion lines halt­ed for two days until the sup­pli­er could resume assem­bling the nec­es­sary parts.

Oth­er Toy­ota sup­pli­ers also had to stop work since the automak­er did not need oth­er parts due to pro­duc­tion down­time. The fire at one plant cost the com­pa­ny about $15 bil­lion in lost prof­its and 70,000 cars due to a two-day downtime.

In the West, the use of JIT was first learned about in 1977 thanks to two articles:

  • A. Ash­burn’s The Famous Ohno Sys­tem’ of Toy­ota” (named after busi­ness­man Tai­ichi Ohno, con­sid­ered the father of lean production)
  • Y. Sug­i­mori’s Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion Sys­tem and Kan­ban: Mate­ri­al­iza­tion of Just-In-Time and Respect-for-Human Systems.”
From the 1980s, the basics of Just-In-Time began to be applied by com­pa­nies in the US and oth­er devel­oped coun­tries. Fujio Cho’s pre­sen­ta­tion (lat­er Pres­i­dent of Toy­ota Motor Corp.) at the Inter­na­tion­al Head­quar­ters of Ford in Detroit in 1980 great­ly con­tributed to the the­o­ret­i­cal inte­gra­tion of the con­cept into pro­duc­tion. In it, he detailed the fea­tures of Toy­ota’s pro­duc­tion sys­tem and empha­sized the advan­tages of JIT and the Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion System.

A notable and con­ta­gious exam­ple of the suc­cess­ful appli­ca­tion of the Just-In-Time” method­ol­o­gy at the time was Omark Sys­tems (now Blount Inter­na­tion­al, Inc). They cre­at­ed a mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the con­cept called ZIPS (zero inven­to­ry pro­duc­tion sys­tem), which increased pro­duc­tiv­i­ty by about 35%.

Richard Schon­berg­er in his book World Class Man­u­fac­tur­ing Case­book: Imple­ment­ing JIT and TQC” uses a sur­vey quote from a com­pa­ny employ­ee as proof of the method­ol­o­gy’s effectiveness:

Labor pro­tec­tion has become much bet­ter. Pre­vi­ous­ly, we could work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, fol­lowed by a long break. Too often, we worked on parts that weren’t need­ed. Now we’re more occu­pied with work­ing on nec­es­sary parts”.
Fur­ther impe­tus for the study and use of Just-In-Time was giv­en by Daniel Jones and Daniel Roos’ book The Machine That Changed the World”

What is Just-In-Time and Why Does Your Com­pa­ny Need It?

Just-In-Time” or JIT is a pro­duc­tion sys­tem where only the items need­ed by con­sumers are pro­duced exact­ly when need­ed and in the required quantity.

This approach is dia­met­ri­cal­ly opposed to mass pro­duc­tion. Two key dif­fer­ences are:

  • Mass Pro­duc­tion: Items are pro­duced in large batch­es, stored, and deliv­ered to con­sumers when an order is received.
    JIT: Pro­duc­tion occurs as orders come in.
  • Mass Pro­duc­tion: Focus­es on pro­duc­ing one type and spec­i­fi­ca­tion of prod­uct in large batch­es.
    JIT: Focus­es on small batch­es of diverse products.
How­ev­er, the JIT con­cept can­not be mechan­i­cal­ly adopt­ed. Tran­si­tion­ing to it requires a new approach to plan­ning and reg­u­lat­ing pro­duc­tion, as JIT is based on cus­tomer orders. It is also nec­es­sary to ana­lyze the need to expand the staff and func­tions of cus­tomer ser­vice oper­a­tors and change the lay­out of equipment.

Dell

DELL

A notable exam­ple of Just-In-Time imple­men­ta­tion is Dell. Michael Dell chose the path of direct sales, where PC assem­bly began only after an order was placed. This deci­sion allowed the com­pa­ny to start installing Pen­tium 4 proces­sors almost three months ear­li­er than HP, as there were no large quan­ti­ties of unsold pre­vi­ous-gen­er­a­tion CPUs in stock!
Loss­es are an ele­ment of the pro­duc­tion process that increas­es costs and adds no value.

DRIFT Con­cept as an Exten­sion of Just-In-Time Ideas

DRIFT stands for Do It Right the First Time. This con­cept emerged fol­low­ing JIT in the 1980s. It involves set­ting up process­es and sys­tems so that the sales depart­ment receives prod­ucts from pro­duc­tion only once, but with­out the slight­est error.
DRIFT poten­tial­ly reduces pro­duc­tion costs by elim­i­nat­ing the need to redis­trib­ute excess inven­to­ry or man­age con­sumer returns.
The essence of the con­cept is sim­ple: Every­thing pro­duced has zero error probability.
This means every­thing com­ing off the con­vey­or is done right the first time. Risks of rework­ing and cor­rec­tions dis­ap­pear, along with the loss of brand reputation.

To imple­ment the DRIFT method­ol­o­gy, it is nec­es­sary to link sys­tems, process­es, and man­age­ment levers into a sin­gle whole to reduce the risk of errors to zero on the first launch. Check­lists can be very help­ful in this.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, there are no stud­ies on DRIFT in the CIS coun­tries. Mean­while, it is even applied in the US Army: Chief War­rant Offi­cer Caleb Kitrell imple­ments three DRIFT strate­gies in his division:

  1. Under­stand the high cost of mak­ing mistakes.
  2. Lead­ers con­stant­ly mon­i­tor and go to places where sol­diers are less like­ly to make mis­takes and waste time.
  3. Active­ly work on elim­i­nat­ing short­com­ings and help com­mand imple­ment solutions.

Advan­tages and Dis­ad­van­tages of JIT

Advan­tages:


  • Main­tain­ing Com­pet­i­tive­ness: Bet­ter meet cus­tomer needs while reduc­ing costs (par­tic­u­lar­ly in stor­ing fin­ished goods).
  • Flex­i­ble Response to Demand Changes: Pro­duc­tion is geared for quick recon­fig­u­ra­tion. No prod­uct accu­mu­la­tion means no obso­les­cence in warehouses.
  • Short­er Pro­duc­tion Cycle: Besides the obvi­ous ben­e­fit of pro­duc­tion speed, it ensures a quick return on invest­ment in production.
  • Resource Release: Can be direct­ed towards pro­duc­ing oth­er prod­ucts or com­plet­ing tasks pre­vi­ous­ly lack­ing bud­get and time.

Dis­ad­van­tages:

  • High Depen­den­cy on Sup­pli­ers: Find­ing sup­pli­ers geo­graph­i­cal­ly close to your pro­duc­tion facil­i­ties or capa­ble of quick­ly sup­ply­ing nec­es­sary mate­ri­als is crucial.
  • Pos­si­ble Increase in Mate­r­i­al Costs: Order­ing small batch­es of parts increas­es their cost.
  • Labor Vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty: Attempts to prompt­ly react to sup­ply and demand con­di­tions lead to the spread of non-tra­di­tion­al labor reg­u­la­tion mech­a­nisms (con­tracts, temporary/project work).
  • Some­times Cheap­er to Store Goods: Par­tic­u­lar­ly rel­e­vant for small busi­ness­es or pro­duc­tion with sup­pli­ers in anoth­er region/country.
  • Increased Trans­porta­tion Costs: Goods are deliv­ered as need­ed, not stored in a ware­house and issued from there.
  • High­er Require­ments for Project Man­age­ment: With­out an estab­lished work­flow, work­er down­time is like­ly. A per­son­al task man­ag­er is indispensable!
  • Increased Vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty to Eco­nom­ic Dete­ri­o­ra­tions: For exam­ple, fuel price spikes will sig­nif­i­cant­ly impact logis­tics costs, thus reduc­ing pro­duc­tion profitability.

TOP‑5 Use­ful Lit­er­a­ture on JIT

Pri­mar­i­ly, the Just-In-Time con­cept is con­sid­ered an ele­ment of kan­ban or lean production.

Here’s our top‑5 book list focus­ing on this system:

  1. The Machine That Changed the World: The Sto­ry of Lean Pro­duc­tion — Toyota’s Secret Weapon in the Glob­al Car Wars That Is Now Rev­o­lu­tion­iz­ing World Indus­try” by James Wom­ack: A best­seller that sig­nif­i­cant­ly boost­ed the study of lean pro­duc­tion and Just-In-Time. First released in 1991, the lat­est edi­tion was in 2007.
  2. Just-in-Time for Oper­a­tors”: A kind of JIT for Dum­mies.” All ele­ments of the Just-In-Time sys­tem are laid out, with struc­tured infor­ma­tion and numer­ous foot­notes explain­ing terminology.
  3. Kan­ban and Just-in-Time at Toy­ota: Man­age­ment Begins at the Work­place” by Tai­ichi Ohno: Since it was pre­pared by Toy­ota spe­cial­ists, this source can be trust­ed. The book con­sists of train­ing mate­ri­als pre­pared for Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion Sys­tem sem­i­nars in the 1970s.
  4. Do It Right the First Time: A Short Guide to Learn­ing From Your Most Mem­o­rable Errors, Mis­takes, and Blun­ders” by Ger­ard I. Nieren­berg: A guide to iden­ti­fy­ing and reduc­ing the num­ber of errors in work and life.
  5. Just-in-Time: Mak­ing It Hap­pen: Unleash­ing the Pow­er of Con­tin­u­ous Improve­ment” by William A. San­dras: This book focus­es on imple­ment­ing Just-In-Time in pro­duc­tion, cov­er­ing sup­pli­er and con­sumer inter­ac­tion, devel­op­ing a func­tion­ing Kan­ban sys­tem, and inte­grat­ing JIT with oth­er tools in production.

Ver­dict

The Just-In-Time con­cept sat­is­fies three con­sumer desires: high prod­uct qual­i­ty, rea­son­able cost, and quick order delivery.
Apply­ing the Just-In-Time sys­tem is a pow­er­ful tool for elim­i­nat­ing pro­duc­tion process losses. 
It enhances com­pa­ny com­pet­i­tive­ness by pro­duc­ing a wide range of prod­ucts at low cost, good qual­i­ty, and a short pro­duc­tion cycle.

esc
Share
или
Business-cases
The Arsenal Insurance team consists of about a thousand people with divisions all over Ukraine. The head office employs over 150 people in more than 10 departments — including lawyers, financiers, accountants...
26 January 2026   •   5 min read
PM school
Task managers have become an integral part of team work. According to data from Cloudwards, small businesses spend an average of $8.9 per user per month on such services, while the average spend is about...
9 September 2025   •   9 min read
PM school
Modern teams spend too much time on communication — not always effective. According to data from Grammarly, an average of 7.5 hours a week is wasted just exchanging information through chats, emails,...
27 August 2025   •   8 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂