•   8 min read

Top 10 Clockify Alternatives in 2025

Time is tick­ing, bud­gets won’t wait, and your team might be spread across dif­fer­ent time zones. This is a famil­iar sit­u­a­tion for any com­pa­ny where pre­cise time track­ing is crit­i­cal. Clock­i­fy remains a pop­u­lar track­er, but in 2025, users are increas­ing­ly seek­ing tools with more flex­i­ble inte­gra­tions, advanced ana­lyt­ics, and built-in task management.

We ana­lyzed the mar­ket and select­ed the 10 best Clock­i­fy alter­na­tives — from the light­weight Tog­gl Track to the all-in-one Work­sec­tion. In this arti­cle, we’ll explain why com­pa­nies are switch­ing plat­forms, which selec­tion cri­te­ria mat­ter, take a clos­er look at each tool, and pro­vide a com­par­i­son table and answers to fre­quent­ly asked ques­tions at the end.

Why Do Users Look for Alter­na­tives to Clockify?

Clock­i­fy does cov­er the basic need — time track­ing. But busi­ness process­es have grown more com­plex in 2025, and teams expect more from their time tracker.
  • Lim­it­ed team func­tion­al­i­ty. Clock­i­fy lacks built-in Gantt charts, Kan­ban boards, or task pri­or­i­ti­za­tion. You have to con­nect exter­nal tools, which com­pli­cates your stack and rais­es costs.
  • Weak data visu­al­iza­tion. Reports are plain tables and charts, with no cus­tomiza­tion options. It’s hard for man­agers to quick­ly spot bot­tle­necks and real­lo­cate resources.
  • Insuf­fi­cient automa­tion. While Clock­i­fy offers a brows­er exten­sion and mobile app, it lacks smart track­ing that auto­mat­i­cal­ly detects what the user is work­ing on. As a result, users have to remem­ber to start/​stop the timer, which may dis­tort actu­al data.
  • Out­dat­ed UX. The inter­face hasn’t changed much in years. Nav­i­ga­tion can be con­fus­ing, and small ele­ments make it hard­er to use on small screens. New users espe­cial­ly strug­gle with onboarding.
  • Lim­it­ed access rights. While you can hide projects from clients, you can’t flex­i­bly set inter­nal vis­i­bil­i­ty lev­els as you can in Work­sec­tion or ClickUp.
  • Scal­ing costs. The basic plan is free, but advanced ana­lyt­ics, bud­get­ing, and fore­cast­ing require expen­sive upgrades. Larg­er teams end up pay­ing as much as for more pow­er­ful sys­tems — but with few­er features.
All of this dri­ves com­pa­nies to search for Clock­i­fy alter­na­tives that com­bine time track­ing, report­ing, and project man­age­ment in a sin­gle interface.

Key Cri­te­ria for Choos­ing a Time Track­ing System

Before switch­ing to anoth­er plat­form, define your busi­ness goals and match them with mar­ket offerings.
  • Track­ing automation
Ide­al­ly, the sys­tem should auto­mat­i­cal­ly detect active apps and web­sites, help assign time to tasks, and min­i­mize man­u­al entry — improv­ing data accu­ra­cy and reduc­ing rou­tine work.
  • User-friend­ly interface
Design should be intu­itive: few­er clicks to key actions means high­er team engage­ment. New users should be able to start work­ing with­out lengthy instructions.
  • Flex­i­ble reporting
Sum­ma­ry reports, fil­ters, visu­al­iza­tion, and export to Excel or Google Sheets let you ana­lyze time by projects, clients, or employees.
  • Inte­gra­tions
The broad­er the list of native inte­gra­tions (Slack, Jira, Asana, Trel­lo, CRMs), the eas­i­er the tool fits into your exist­ing stack and auto­mates workflows.
  • Secu­ri­ty
In 2025, most com­pa­nies oper­ate remote­ly, so two-fac­tor authen­ti­ca­tion, data encryp­tion, and back­ups are essential.
  • Col­lab­o­ra­tion tools
Role assign­ments, file shar­ing, task com­ments, and selec­tive client access turn a time track­er into a full-fledged project hub.
  • Total cost of ownership
Pay atten­tion to the pric­ing struc­ture — some tools offer attrac­tive entry plans but scale up costs dras­ti­cal­ly with added users or advanced report­ing modules.

The Best Clock­i­fy Alter­na­tives in 2025

Here are 10 tools that can suc­cess­ful­ly replace Clock­i­fy. Each is briefly described to help you quick­ly assess its strengths and ide­al use case.

Work­sec­tion

As your team grows, keep­ing all process­es in one place becomes hard­er. Work­sec­tion solves this holis­ti­cal­ly: it com­bines Kan­ban boards, Gantt charts, a cal­en­dar, and a built-in time track­er. All fea­tures are avail­able on every plan — no need to pay extra for Gantt charts or advanced analytics.

Unlike Clock­i­fy, each task func­tions as a mini work­flow with dis­cus­sions, files, check­lists, and time logs. Man­agers can track logged hours, dead­lines, and team work­load distribution.

Key advan­tages:
  • Flex­i­ble access con­trol — invite clients to select­ed projects only
  • Auto­mat­ic dead­line reminders
  • Team work­load chart helps spot avail­abil­i­ty gaps for planning
  • Trans­par­ent pric­ing — all fea­tures includ­ed, no hid­den upgrades
If you’re look­ing for a Clock­i­fy replace­ment with robust task man­age­ment and visu­al­iza­tion, Work­sec­tion is a nat­ur­al choice.

Tog­gl Track

Tog­gl Track is known for its sim­plic­i­ty: start the timer, work, stop it. Its auto-track­er mon­i­tors active win­dows and sug­gests log­ging time if you for­get. Reports can be brand­ed and cus­tomized for clients. The free plan suits free­lancers, while pre­mi­um plans offer advanced ana­lyt­ics. How­ev­er, project man­age­ment fea­tures are lim­it­ed, so teams often pair it with an exter­nal task manager.

Click­Up

Click­Up brands itself as an all-in-one” solu­tion: tasks, doc­u­ments, chats, boards, Gantt charts — and time track­ing too. It works well for teams using agile method­olo­gies (Scrum, Kan­ban, OKR). Cus­tom fields and automa­tions enable com­plex work­flows with­out code. The down­side? A clut­tered inter­face. Begin­ners may find it hard to nav­i­gate the vast num­ber of options.


TMet­ric

TMet­ric appeals to com­pa­nies that require strict bud­get con­trol and hourly billing. It tracks brows­er tabs, takes desk­top screen­shots, cal­cu­lates time costs in USD or EUR, and com­pares them to project bud­gets. It includes invoic­ing and inte­grates with Quick­Books. Despite the fea­ture set, the inter­face stays light­weight — switch­ing projects only takes a few clicks.


Ever­hour

If your team works in Asana, Trel­lo, or Jira, Ever­hour inte­grates direct­ly into task cards — no plu­g­ins need­ed. Logged hours are vis­i­ble with­in task lists, with­out switch­ing tabs. The plat­form sup­ports bud­get fore­casts and Slack sync. The main dif­fer­ence from Clock­i­fy is the deep inte­gra­tion: time data appears where the team already works.

Time Doc­tor

For dis­trib­uted teams, pro­duc­tiv­i­ty mon­i­tor­ing is cru­cial — and Time Doc­tor address­es this direct­ly. It takes screen­shots, tracks key­board and mouse activ­i­ty, and logs web­site vis­its. Man­agers get detailed reports; employ­ees can track their own stats. It also sup­ports auto­mat­ed billing and pay­roll. If you need mon­i­tor­ing more than project man­age­ment, Time Doc­tor may suit you bet­ter than Work­sec­tion or ClickUp.

Desk­Time

Desk­Time com­bines auto-track­ing, pro­duc­tiv­i­ty analy­sis, and shift sched­ul­ing. It cat­e­go­rizes apps as pro­duc­tive,” neu­tral,” or dis­tract­ing” and cre­ates dai­ly focus reports. The Absence Cal­en­dar” mod­ule helps shift-based teams log vaca­tion or sick leave. The inter­face is clean, but its report­ing fea­tures are more lim­it­ed than Tog­gl Track.

Time­ly

Time­ly relies on AI to auto­mat­i­cal­ly log user activ­i­ty by project and task. This means employ­ees get full timesheets with­out touch­ing a timer, while man­agers get hourly bud­get fore­casts. It fea­tures a visu­al time time­line and a mobile app for approv­ing logs with a swipe. Down­sides? High price — the AI mod­ule is more expen­sive than Work­sec­tion or TMetric.


Har­vest

Har­vest has been around since before time track­ing went main­stream and is a free­lancer favorite. Its strength is built-in billing: log hours, hit Cre­ate Invoice,” and send it to the client. Inte­gra­tions with Stripe and Pay­Pal help you get paid faster. How­ev­er, it lacks Kan­ban or Gantt views, so task man­age­ment often requires exter­nal tools.


Hub­staff

Hub­staff is built for remote teams and out­sourc­ing agen­cies. It com­bines GPS track­ing, screen­shots, key­stroke mon­i­tor­ing, and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty analy­sis. It has built-in pay­roll and sup­ports pay­ments via Pay­oneer or Wise. If your team works onsite at client loca­tions, Hub­staff shows when they’re there. Down­sides include over-mon­i­tor­ing, which may hurt team trust.


Com­par­i­son Table: Best Clock­i­fy Alternatives

Ser­vice Auto Track­er Task Man­age­ment Gantt Chart Bud­get­ing Start­ing Price per User Key Dif­fer­ence from Clockify
Work­sec­tion Timer + AI/​manual Kan­ban, list, subtasks Includ­ed on all plans Projects, bud­gets, reports $4.50 Full fea­tures by default, rich visualization
Tog­gl
Track
Yes Lim­it­ed No Reports $10 Eas­i­est UI, pow­er­ful reporting
Click­Up Yes Advanced Yes Yes $7 All-in-one tool, but interface-heavy
TMet­ric Yes + screenshots No No Yes $5 Bud­get and hourly rate tracking
Ever­hour Built-in inte­gra­tions Through Asana/​Trello From inte­gra­tion Yes $8 Embed­ded inside task tools
Time Doc­tor Yes + screenshots No No Reports $7 Detailed pro­duc­tiv­i­ty tracking
Desk­Time Yes Lim­it­ed No Par­tial $7 App clas­si­fi­ca­tion by productivity
Time­ly Full AI No No Yes $11 Ful­ly auto­mat­ed time logging
Har­vest Timer Lim­it­ed No Invoic­ing $12 Inte­grat­ed billing & invoicing
Hub­staff Yes + GPS Lim­it­ed No Pay­roll $7 Geolo­ca­tion and pay­roll out-of-the-box

Which Plat­form Should You Choose in 2025?

If your team is small and only needs time track­ing, Clockify’s or Tog­gl Track’s free plans may be enough. But once you man­age mul­ti­ple projects and clients, a basic track­er won’t suffice.
For com­pa­nies need­ing full task man­age­ment, visu­al­iza­tion, and col­lab­o­ra­tion, Work­sec­tion is a top choice — Kan­ban, Gantt, time track­ing, and report­ing are all includ­ed with no extra mod­ules or fees.
  • If auto­mat­ed time track­ing is your pri­or­i­ty, go with Timely.
  • For activ­i­ty mon­i­tor­ing and remote team secu­ri­ty, Time Doc­tor or Hub­staff are log­i­cal options.
  • If you need hourly billing and strict bud­get­ing, TMet­ric is a great fit.
  • And for free­lancers, Har­vest remains a con­ve­nient tool with built-in invoicing.
In any case — define what mat­ters most to your busi­ness first, and the right choice will become clear.

Fre­quent­ly Asked Ques­tions (FAQ)

Which Clock­i­fy alter­na­tive is best for agencies?

Agen­cies work­ing with fixed bud­gets and hourly billing will ben­e­fit from Work­sec­tion and TMet­ric. Both allow time track­ing by task, set­ting bud­gets, spot­ting over­spend, and export­ing detailed reports for clients. Work­sec­tion also pro­vides Kan­ban boards and Gantt charts — sim­pli­fy­ing plan­ning and coordination.

Are there free alter­na­tives to Clockify?

Yes. Tog­gl Track and TMet­ric offer free ver­sions with basic time track­ing and reports. Lim­its may apply to projects or users, but they’re often enough for free­lancers and small teams. Work­sec­tion also offers a free tri­al so you can explore Kan­ban, Gantt, and ana­lyt­ics risk-free.

How is Work­sec­tion dif­fer­ent from Clockify?

Clock­i­fy focus­es sole­ly on time track­ing. Work­sec­tion com­bines a time track­er with full project man­age­ment: Kan­ban boards, Gantt charts, a cal­en­dar, auto­mat­ic reports, and flex­i­ble access rights — all includ­ed in every plan. For teams that val­ue dead­lines, visu­al­iza­tion, and col­lab­o­ra­tion, Work­sec­tion is a more ver­sa­tile solution.

Con­clu­sion

Clock­i­fy is a sol­id entry point in the time track­ing world, but the demands of 2025 teams go far beyond sim­ple hour log­ging. If you need automa­tion, flex­i­ble ana­lyt­ics, and project man­age­ment, con­sid­er Work­sec­tion, Click­Up, or Time­lyAgen­cies will appre­ci­ate TMet­ric and Hub­staff, while free­lancers will love Tog­gl Track’s sim­plic­i­ty and Harvest’s invoic­ing. The key is to assess your inter­nal work­flows, test a few favorites, and choose a plat­form that will grow with your business.

esc
Share
или
PM school
Linear has long earned a reputation as a fast, uncluttered issue-tracker loved by developers for its clean interface and handy shortcuts. Still, by 2025 many teams need more flexibility, richer visualization...
20 June 2025   •   7 min read
PM school
For years GanttPRO was viewed as the “gold standard” of visual planning, yet in 2025 companies increasingly look for a GanttPRO alternative that offers more flexible pricing, richer collaboration, and...
20 June 2025   •   7 min read
PM school
Backlog has long been a go-to task manager for developers: it offers boards, bug tracking, a wiki and a basic Git repository. Yet over the past two or three years the market has accelerated. Hybrid teams...
19 June 2025   •   8 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂