•   12 min read

10 best Clockify alternatives in 2026

The clock is tick­ing. Bud­gets don’t wait.
Are you still man­u­al­ly start­ing the timer every time you switch tasks? In 2026, there are tools that do this for you — and much more.
Clock­i­fy was a decent start. Free, sim­ple, basic time track­ing. But here’s the thing — teams have grown. Projects have become more com­plex. And you need more than just a timer.
We’ve gath­ered the top 10 alter­na­tives with cur­rent prices for 2026, real fea­tures, and hon­est reviews — who each tool is suit­able for. Let’s get started.

TL;DR — Quick Summary

Here’s what you need to know:
  • Best price: Work­sec­tion — from $3/​user with kan­ban, Gantt chart, and time track­er all in one solution.
  • Eas­i­est: Tog­gl Track — $9/​user, mas­ter it in 5 minutes.
  • For bud­get con­trol: TMet­ric — $5/​user, tracks the cost of each minute.
  • For free­lancers: Har­vest — $11/​user, invoic­es clients in just a few clicks.
  • AI automa­tion: Time­ly — $9/​user, tags time with­out your involvement.
  • Team mon­i­tor­ing: Time Doc­tor ($6.70/user) or Hub­staff ($7/​user) with screenshots.
Sum­ma­ry: If you need a com­pre­hen­sive tool — Work­sec­tion. Just a track­er — Tog­gl Track. Billing — Har­vest. Automa­tion — Time­ly. More details com­ing up. 

Why are teams look­ing for alter­na­tives to Clockify?

Let’s be hon­est. Clock­i­fy does one thing — counts hours. And it does this for free.
But here’s the problem.
  • Lim­it­ed func­tion­al­i­ty. No Gantt charts. No kan­ban boards. Want to see how tasks are dis­trib­uted among the team? You’ll have to export to Excel and draw it yourself.
  • Visu­al­iza­tion stuck in 2015. Dry tables that are hard to read. Min­i­mal cus­tomiza­tion — take it or leave it.
  • Poor automa­tion. No intel­li­gent track­ing. No auto­mat­ic time allo­ca­tion for projects. You turn on each timer man­u­al­ly — and don’t for­get to turn it off; oth­er­wise, you’ll be work­ing” on one task all day.
  • Out­dat­ed UX. Com­pli­cat­ed nav­i­ga­tion, espe­cial­ly on mobile. For sim­ple time track­ing, this isn’t crit­i­cal, but if the team is work­ing from phones — there will be complaints.
  • Lim­it­ed access rights. Want the client to see only their project? Or want the design­er not to mess with finances? Options are few.
  • Scal­ing costs. The free plan is lim­it­ed. Once you need advanced report­ing or inte­gra­tions — you’ll have to pay. And then the price is not so attrac­tive com­pared to com­peti­tors that offer more for the same money.
If any of these points res­onate — there are bet­ter options.

What to look for when choos­ing a time tracker?

Before div­ing into the list, deter­mine your priorities.
  1. Track­ing automa­tion.Do you need a timer that starts auto­mat­i­cal­ly when you open a project? Or AI that dis­trib­utes time across tasks? This saves hours a week.
  2. Inter­face sim­plic­i­ty.If the team spends 10 min­utes fig­ur­ing out where to click — some­thing is wrong. The inter­face should be intu­itive from the first entry.
  3. Flex­i­ble report­ing.Need reports for clients? For account­ing? For ana­lyz­ing team work­load? Check if you can cus­tomize dash­boards to your needs.
  4. Inte­gra­tions. Does the track­er work with your tools? Asana, Trel­lo, Jira, Slack, Quick­Books — what inte­gra­tions are crit­i­cal for you?
  5. Data secu­ri­ty.Where is the data stored? Are there ISO 27001, GDPR com­pli­ance cer­tifi­cates? For teams work­ing with con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion, this is not just a checkbox.
  6. Col­lab­o­ra­tion. Can team mem­bers see each other’s work­load? Are there com­ments on timers? How is task dis­tri­b­u­tion organized?
  7. Cost of own­er­ship. The price per user is just the begin­ning. Are there hid­den fees for inte­gra­tions, reports, stor­age? How does the cost change when scal­ing to 50+ people?
Now, onto the tools.

The best Clock­i­fy alter­na­tives in 2026

Work­sec­tion

A com­pre­hen­sive sys­tem that com­bines kan­ban boards, Gantt charts, a cal­en­dar, and a built-in time tracker.

What makes Work­sec­tion special:
  • All fea­tures are avail­able in any plan. No need to pay extra for Gantt or kan­ban — every­thing is includ­ed right away.
  • Each task lives as a mini-process. Dis­cus­sions, files, check­lists, timesheets — every­thing in one place. No need to switch between dozens of tabs.
  • Flex­i­ble access rights. Invite clients for free and cus­tomize what they can see. No risk of them see­ing inter­nal com­mu­ni­ca­tion or salaries.
  • Team work­load dia­gram. See who is over­loaded and who has avail­able hours — before any­one burns out.
  • Auto­mat­ic dead­line reminders. The sys­tem itself reminds you when the dead­line is approach­ing — no need to keep every­thing in your head.
Who it’s suit­able for:
Agen­cies, devel­op­ment stu­dios, mar­ket­ing teams — any­one man­ag­ing mul­ti­ple projects simul­ta­ne­ous­ly and need­ing not just time track­ing but full management.

Tog­gl Track

One of the sim­plest time track­ers on the market.

Why teams choose Tog­gl Track:
  • Min­i­mal­ist inter­face. Big red timer, start” but­ton — that’s it. Train­ing takes 5 min­utes, not an hour.
  • The auto-track­er tracks active win­dows. The sys­tem sees you’re work­ing in Fig­ma — and sug­gests auto­mat­i­cal­ly adding time to the design project.
  • Pow­er­ful ana­lyt­ics. Reports are detailed, can be brand­ed, and sent to clients direct­ly from the system.
  • Cus­tom reports in just a few clicks. Select the peri­od, project, fil­ters — export to PDF or Excel.
Lim­i­ta­tions:
No task man­age­ment. Tog­gl Track tracks time but does not help dis­trib­ute tasks or plan sprints. You’ll need to inte­grate it with a sep­a­rate task manager.

Who it’s suit­able for:
Teams that need just a time track­er — with­out unnec­es­sary com­pli­ca­tions. Works per­fect­ly in tan­dem with Asana, Trel­lo, or Jira.

Click­Up

Posi­tions itself as an all-in-one” solution.

What dis­tin­guish­es ClickUp:
  • Tasks, doc­u­ments, chats, boards, Gantt charts, time track­er — every­thing under one roof.
  • Cus­tom fields and automa­tions. Cus­tomize work­flows for any sce­nario — from devel­op­ment to mar­ket­ing campaigns.
  • Sup­ports Scrum, Kan­ban, OKR. Work in the way your team is com­fort­able — no need to adapt to the tool.
  • Com­plex no-code pipelines. Auto­mate rou­tines through a visu­al edi­tor — with­out developers.
Nuance:
Over­loaded with mod­ules. For new users, this can be over­whelm­ing. Set aside a week for set­up and team training.

Who it’s suit­able for:
Prod­uct teams and star­tups that want to tai­lor the sys­tem to unique process­es and are will­ing to invest time in setup.

TMet­ric

Will appeal to com­pa­nies that need strict bud­get control.

What makes TMet­ric valuable:
  • Tracks active tabs, takes screen­shots, cal­cu­lates the cost of min­utes. You see not just how many hours,” but also how much it costs.”
  • Real-time com­par­i­son of expens­es with project bud­get. The sys­tem alerts you when you’re approach­ing the lim­it — before you overspend.
  • Inte­gra­tion with Quick­Books. Syn­chro­niza­tion with account­ing with­out man­u­al export — sav­ing an hour weekly.
  • Sim­ple inter­face with­out unnec­es­sary fea­tures. Start the timer, see ana­lyt­ics — that’s it.
  • Focus: Bud­get con­trol and hourly billing.
Who it’s suit­able for:
Agen­cies with hourly billing, out­sourc­ing teams, free­lancers — any­one for whom stick­ing to the bud­get is critical.

Ever­hour

Inte­grates direct­ly into Asana, Trel­lo, or Jira.

Unique­ness of Everhour:
  • The track­er is embed­ded direct­ly into the task card. No need to switch between tabs — you see time and tasks in one place.
  • Data is vis­i­ble where the team works dai­ly. If you live in Asana, Ever­hour will become part of it — not a sep­a­rate tool.
  • Bud­get fore­cast­ing. The sys­tem pre­dicts whether you’ll stay with­in bud­get based on your cur­rent work speed.
  • Syn­chro­niza­tion with Slack. The team receives reminders about start/​stop timer right in the work chat.
Lim­i­ta­tions:
Min­i­mum of 5 seats in the paid plan — even if it’s just three of you.

Who it’s suit­able for:
Teams that already work in Asana, Trel­lo, or Jira and don’t want to change habits — sim­ply add the time tracker.

Time Doc­tor

For dis­trib­uted teams focused on per­for­mance monitoring.

What Time Doc­tor includes:
  • Screen­shot cap­ture at ran­dom inter­vals. You see what the team is real­ly busy with — not just from the timer.
  • Analy­sis of key­board and mouse activ­i­ty. The sys­tem records peri­ods of inac­tiv­i­ty — if the com­put­er has been idle for 3+ min­utes, the time isn’t counted.
  • Track­ing web­sites and appli­ca­tions. Reports show how much time is spent on Face­book vs work tools.
  • Detailed reports for man­agers. Invoic­ing and pay­roll based on hours worked.
Nuance:
This is per­for­mance mon­i­tor­ing, not task man­age­ment. If you need a full task man­ag­er — look for oth­er options.

Who it’s suit­able for:
Out­sourc­ing com­pa­nies, remote teams, and any­one who needs detailed per­for­mance control.

Desk­Time

Com­bines auto-track­ing, pro­duc­tiv­i­ty analy­sis, and shift planning.

Fea­tures of DeskTime:
  • Clas­si­fi­ca­tion of appli­ca­tions as pro­duc­tive,” neu­tral,” dis­tract­ing.” The algo­rithm auto­mat­i­cal­ly allo­cates time — Fig­ma is pro­duc­tive, YouTube is distracting.
  • Absence Cal­en­dar mod­ule for hol­i­days and sick leaves. You see who is at work, who is on leave — every­thing in one place.
  • Sleek inter­face with­out func­tion over­load. Sim­ple and easy to under­stand — the team will start using it in a day.
Down­side:
Reports lack the detail of Tog­gl Track. If you need deep ana­lyt­ics — this isn’t the best choice.

Who it’s suit­able for:
Small teams and free­lancers look­ing for auto­mat­ic track­ing with­out com­pli­cat­ed setup.

Time­ly

Relies on arti­fi­cial intelligence.

What makes Time­ly unique:
  • Activ­i­ty is auto­mat­i­cal­ly dis­trib­uted across projects and tasks. AI ana­lyzes where you were work­ing (doc­u­ments, appli­ca­tions, web­sites) and cre­ates a time­line by itself.
  • Auto­mat­ic tag­ging of time with­out clicks. You just work — the sys­tem records every­thing itself and sug­gests con­fir­ma­tion at the end of the day.
  • Visu­al time­line. You see the entire day on one screen — easy to find where two hours disappeared.”
  • Mobile app with swip­ing. Con­firm or edit entries with sim­ple ges­tures — no long forms.
Down­side:
High price for the AI mod­ule. If the bud­get is lim­it­ed, there are cheap­er alter­na­tives with man­u­al tracking.

Who it’s suit­able for:
Teams that want to min­i­mize man­u­al work and are will­ing to pay for AI automation.

Har­vest

A favorite among free­lancers and small agencies.

Why Har­vest is popular:
  • Built-in invoic­ing mod­ule. Cap­ture hours → cre­ate invoice → send to client. All in 3 clicks.
  • Inte­gra­tions with Stripe and Pay­Pal. The client pays direct­ly from the invoice — no need to wait for bank trans­fers for weeks.
  • Sim­plic­i­ty for free­lancers. Start the timer, cap­ture the rate, gen­er­ate the invoice — done.
Lim­i­ta­tions:
No kan­ban or Gantt chart. Har­vest tracks time and gen­er­ates invoic­es — task man­age­ment requires a sep­a­rate tool.

Who it’s suit­able for:
Free­lancers, design­ers, con­sul­tants — any­one who works on an hourly basis and invoic­es clients weekly.

Hub­staff

Tar­get­ed at dis­trib­uted teams and out­sourc­ing agencies.

What dis­tin­guish­es Hubstaff:
  • GPS track­ing out of the box. For teams work­ing on-site (builders, couri­ers) — you see where each employ­ee is right now.
  • Screen­shots and key­stroke mon­i­tor­ing. Detailed activ­i­ty con­trol — the sys­tem records not just time but what activ­i­ty was performed.
  • Pay­ments through Pay­oneer or Wise. Pay the team in any coun­try with­out trips to the bank — every­thing is automated.
  • Pay­roll mod­ule. Cal­cu­lates hours worked, applies rates, gen­er­ates pay­outs — account­ing is automatic.
Nuance:
Exces­sive mon­i­tor­ing may low­er trust in the team. If you work with per­ma­nent employ­ees who do not require micro­man­age­ment — this may be excessive.

Who it’s suit­able for:
Out­sourc­ing agen­cies, remote teams with high turnover, any­one need­ing GPS track­ing and detailed monitoring.

Com­par­i­son table of the best Clock­i­fy alter­na­tives in 2026 

Ser­vice Auto-track­er Task man­age­ment Gantt chart Bud­get­ing Min­i­mum price per user/​month Dif­fer­ence from Clockify
Work­sec­tion Timer + man­u­al and AI suggestions Kan­ban, list, subtasks In any plan Projects, bud­gets, reports $3 All fea­tures avail­able imme­di­ate­ly, deep visualization
Tog­gl Track Yes Lim­it­ed No Reports $9 Sim­plest inter­face, pow­er­ful analytics
Click­Up Yes Exten­sive Yes Yes $7 All-in-one but over­loaded with modules
TMet­ric Yes + screenshots No No Yes $5 Bud­get con­trol and cost per minute
Ever­hour With­in integrations Through Asana/​Trello From inte­gra­tion Yes $8.50 Built direct­ly into the task card
Time Doc­tor Yes + screenshots No No Reports $6.70 Deep pro­duc­tiv­i­ty monitoring
Desk­Time Yes Lim­it­ed No Par­tial­ly $6.42 Clas­si­fi­ca­tion of appli­ca­tions by productivity
Time­ly Full AI No No Yes $9 Auto­mat­ic time tagging
Har­vest Timer Lim­it­ed No Invoic­es $11 Built-in billing and invoicing
Hub­staff Yes + GPS Lim­it­ed No Pay­roll $7 Geolo­ca­tion and pay­ments out of the box

Which plat­form to choose in 2025?

It depends on your priorities.
  • Just hour track­ing.Free options like Clock­i­fy or Tog­gl Track ($9/​user) will cov­er basic needs with­out complications.
  • Com­pre­hen­sive man­age­ment. Work­sec­tion — kan­ban, Gantt chart, track­er, reports in one tool. Best val­ue for money.
  • Auto­mat­ic time allo­ca­tion. Time­ly with AI — you work, the sys­tem tracks every­thing itself. Min­i­mum man­u­al work.
  • Activ­i­ty mon­i­tor­ing. Time Doc­tor or Hub­staff with screen­shots and GPS track­ing. For out­sourc­ing teams.
  • Hourly billing agen­cies. TMet­ric — real-time bud­get con­trol. See the cost of each minute.
  • Free­lancers. Har­vest — quick invoic­es to clients in just a few clicks. Inte­gra­tion with pay­ment systems.
Try Work­sec­tion for free for 14 days and see how the time track­er works togeth­er with kan­ban and Gantt.

Fre­quent­ly Asked Ques­tions (FAQ)

Which Clock­i­fy alter­na­tive is best for agencies?

Work­sec­tion and TMetric.
Both plat­forms allow you to track time by tasks, set bud­gets, fore­cast over­runs, and gen­er­ate detailed reports for clients.
Work­sec­tion adds kan­ban, Gantt, and cal­en­dar — full project man­age­ment. TMet­ric focus­es on bud­get con­trol — you can see the cost of each minute in real-time.
If you need a com­pre­hen­sive tool — Work­sec­tion. If just time track­ing with bud­get­ing — TMetric.

Are there free alter­na­tives to Clockify?

Yes, but with limitations.
  • Tog­gl Track has a free plan for up to 5 users. Basic track­ing and reports work, but advanced ana­lyt­ics are only avail­able in paid plans.
  • TMet­ric also offers a free ver­sion with lim­it­ed func­tion­al­i­ty — suit­able for solo free­lancers or very small teams.
  • Work­sec­tion pro­vides a 14-day tri­al to test all fea­tures — kan­ban, Gantt chart, time track­er, reports.
  • If you need a free track­er for­ev­er — Tog­gl Track or TMetric. 

How does Work­sec­tion dif­fer from Clockify?

Clock­i­fy is only time track­ing. Work­sec­tion is a full project man­age­ment sys­tem with a built-in time tracker.
Work­sec­tion includes kan­ban boards, Gantt charts, cal­en­dars, detailed report­ing, and flex­i­ble access rights. Every­thing in one place — no need to inte­grate 5 dif­fer­ent tools.
Clock­i­fy counts hours and gen­er­ates basic reports. For task man­age­ment, you will need to con­nect Trel­lo, Asana, or anoth­er task manager.

Is screen mon­i­tor­ing nec­es­sary for a remote team?

It depends on the lev­el of trust and the nature of work.
For out­sourc­ing com­pa­nies with high turnover or novice teams — mon­i­tor­ing can be ben­e­fi­cial. Time Doc­tor and Hub­staff pro­vide screen­shots and activ­i­ty analysis.
For per­ma­nent employ­ees with trust — this may low­er moti­va­tion. You don’t trust me, so you watch?” — not the best mes­sage for the team.
Alter­na­tive: Work­sec­tion with work­load charts. You can see how many hours each per­son has worked, on which tasks — with­out screen­shots and micromanagement.

Con­clu­sion

Choos­ing an alter­na­tive to Clock­i­fy is a bal­ance between func­tion­al­i­ty, price, and ease of use.
  • If you need a com­pre­hen­sive tool with­out hid­den fees — con­sid­er Worksection.
  • For sim­ple track­ing with pow­er­ful ana­lyt­ics — Tog­gl Track.
  • Billing and invoic­ing — Harvest.
  • AI automa­tion — Timely.
  • Per­for­mance mon­i­tor­ing — Time Doc­tor or Hubstaff.
My advice? Try 2 – 3 options dur­ing their free tri­al peri­ods. Launch a real project, invite the team, and see what fits you best.
Because the best time track­er is the one your team actu­al­ly uses every day, not the one with the longest list of fea­tures in mar­ket­ing materials.
Start with Work­sec­tion and test the time track­er, kan­ban, Gantt chart, and all tools for free for 14 days — keep your projects always on bud­get and on schedule.

esc
Share
или
PM school
Yaware remains popular in Ukraine as an employee monitoring system, but in 2026, teams are increasingly seeking alternatives due to excessive control, complicated interfaces, and conflicts with privacy...
6 February 2026   •   16 min read
PM school
Screenshots every 10 minutes. URL logs. Keylogging. Sounds like surveillance, not management — doesn’t it? Time Doctor was one of the first serious time trackers with productivity monitoring. But here...
5 February 2026   •   13 min read
PM school
Toggl Track remains popular due to its minimalist interface, but in 2026 teams need more: advanced analytics, transparent reports for clients, automatic tracking, and workload management. This review...
5 February 2026   •   15 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂