•     •   18 min read

Best 41 Productivity Tools That Will Make Your Life Much Easier

Pro­duc­tiv­i­ty is an impor­tant eco­nom­ic val­ue that actu­al­ly shows the cost-ben­e­fit ratio. It depends on many fac­tors, due to which it can be both increased and decreased. Today, the best prac­tice to man­age it, is using spe­cial pro­duc­tiv­i­ty tools for work.

What pro­duc­tiv­i­ty actu­al­ly is

Pro­duc­tiv­i­ty is an indi­ca­tor of eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty that com­pares the amount of resources (time, mon­ey, labor, mate­ri­als, etc.) spent on the pro­duc­tion of goods / ser­vices with the amount of prof­it. In a nut­shell, for project man­age­ment pro­duc­tiv­i­ty also means, how effi­cient­ly one per­son com­pletes a task.

4 Types Of Pro­duc­tiv­i­ty You Should Know About

There are 4 types of pro­duc­tiv­i­ty: cap­i­tal, mate­r­i­al, labor, and total fac­tor productivity.
  1. Cap­i­tal pro­duc­tiv­i­ty means how well a team uses phys­i­cal cap­i­tal to pro­duce a vari­ety of goods and ser­vices. Such phys­i­cal cap­i­tal are com­put­ers, vehi­cles, work­ing mate­ri­als, etc. In a nut­shell, this is a phys­i­cal resource that is used to make goods and ser­vices. In order to deter­mine your cap­i­tal pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, you need to sub­tract your mon­e­tary oblig­a­tions (costs, etc.) from the val­ue of your phys­i­cal resources. The result­ing num­ber should be divid­ed by sales rev­enue. As a result, the high­er num­ber you get, the bet­ter, because it will mean that your phys­i­cal resources allow you to work effi­cient­ly and make a prof­it from goods and services.
  2. Mate­r­i­al pro­duc­tiv­i­ty mea­sures in terms of goods and ser­vices pro­duced. It express­es the amount of eco­nom­ic out­put gen­er­at­ed per unit of con­sumed mate­ri­als. It should be not­ed that the mate­ri­als are direct and indi­rect. Direct mate­ri­als are com­bined with the prod­uct / ser­vice, while indi­rect mate­ri­als can be fuel, ener­gy, chem­i­cals, etc., used to cre­ate the prod­uct / service.
  3. Labor pro­duc­tiv­i­ty is the rate of out­put per per­son, which shows how effi­cient­ly each mem­ber of your team works to cre­ate the final prod­uct / ser­vice. This pro­duc­tiv­i­ty shows how long it took your team to bring your final prod­uct to mar­ket. In order to deter­mine labor pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, you need to divide the val­ue of your prod­ucts / ser­vices by the time your team spent cre­at­ing them.
  4. Total fac­tor pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, also known as ​“mul­ti­fac­tor”, means that in addi­tion to cap­i­tal, mate­ri­als, and labor, there are oth­er fac­tors that are also tak­en into account to mea­sure pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. These fac­tors are team knowl­edge, man­age­ment style, and work­flow orga­ni­za­tion, etc. In order to mea­sure total fac­tor pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, you need to divide the val­ue of all your prod­ucts / ser­vices by the weight­ed aver­age of all fac­tors. In this way you deter­mine the role of every­thing that is a part of your pro­duc­tion process.

The Best Ways To Improve Productivity

First of all, let’s deter­mine fac­tors, which affect your pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, and they include work­place envi­ron­ment, peo­ple man­age­ment prac­tices, appro­pri­ate tools, and mod­ern tech­nol­o­gy used. Accord­ing to this, there are a lot of prac­tices, which can help you to improve productivity.
  • Stop mul­ti­task­ing. There were times when mul­ti­task­ing was con­sid­ered a good prac­tice, but today it has been shown to reduce effi­cien­cy and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. Mul­ti­task­ing dis­tracts, exhausts and dis­rupts work­flow coordination.
  • Set small goals. The main goal of the project can be very broad and gen­er­al, so you need to detail it as much as pos­si­ble. Set short-term and clear goals with­in the over­all goal.
  • Take breaks. In order to main­tain a pro­duc­tive rhythm of work, you need to take breaks from time to time. For exam­ple, you can use a pomodoro tech­nique. This means that you work inten­sive­ly and focused for 25 min­utes, then take a 5‑minute break and return to work. You can change the dura­tion of work inter­vals and breaks by adjust­ing them to your liking.
  • Com­mu­ni­cate with team­mates. When work­ing in a team and with a cus­tomer, you need to con­stant­ly share infor­ma­tion about the sta­tus of the project. This is impor­tant because if you are hav­ing dif­fi­cul­ty, you should not remain silent, but should seek help, and always clar­i­fy the nature of the task. 
  • Use pro­duc­tiv­i­ty tools. You should use spe­cial web pro­duc­tiv­i­ty tools to deter­mine pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and main­tain a high lev­el of it. What are pro­duc­tiv­i­ty tools? These can be spe­cial work mes­sen­gers, task track­ers, cost and income cal­cu­la­tors, and others.
Mod­ern soft­ware will help you effec­tive­ly man­age your work­flow and respond to changes in a time­ly man­ner, which will have a pos­i­tive effect on your team’s performance. 

How To Mea­sure Pro­duc­tiv­i­ty Level

There are dif­fer­ent meth­ods to mea­sure your team’s pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. A project man­ag­er choos­es the most appro­pri­ate one, depend­ing on the prod­uct type and work fea­tures. You can choose one or sev­er­al ways to mea­sure pro­duc­tiv­i­ty of your team, using tools, which help to increase productivity. 

Method 1 Pro­vide man­age­ment by objec­tives. Set clear goals and objec­tives for your employ­ees, and don’t for­get about dead­lines. With the help of task man­agers, track the per­for­mance of each employ­ee, his per­son­al con­tri­bu­tion to the devel­op­ment of the prod­uct / service. 
Method 2 The quo­ta­tive mea­sure­ment. This is a sim­ple method of assess­ing employ­ee pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, which shows how many tasks, pro­grams, parts, etc., can be qual­i­ta­tive­ly processed by one employ­ee in one hour or one work­ing day. 
Method 3 The prof­it mea­sure­ment. Instead of track­ing the work of each employ­ee, you can mon­i­tor the prof­its from goods and ser­vices pro­duced by the team. Thus, if prof­its increase sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly, it means that the team is work­ing effi­cient­ly and pro­duc­tive­ly, and con­verse­ly, increas­ing costs and reduc­ing prof­its is a sig­nal that the work­flow is dis­rupt­ed and this neg­a­tive­ly affects productivity.

41 Top Pro­duc­tiv­i­ty Tools

Today, the world mar­ket rep­re­sents a large num­ber of tools for pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. Let’s talk about the most pop­u­lar and the best pro­duc­tiv­i­ty tools, and men­tion their main pros/​cons.

Work­sec­tion

Work­sec­tion is a Ukrain­ian cloud-based project man­age­ment and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty plat­form, which brings great solu­tions for small and large busi­ness­es. It serves var­i­ous seg­ments: dig­i­tal agen­cies, web-stu­dious, HR struc­ture, dig­i­tal-pro­duc­tion com­pa­nies, man­u­fac­tur­ing teams, and others. 


Pros: pro­duc­tiv­i­ty man­age­ment, and long list of fea­tures (per­fect dash­board, flex­i­ble inter­face, time track­ing, easy com­mu­ni­ca­tion, Gantt chart, Kan­ban board, project reports, tech­ni­cal sup­port, and data pro­tec­tion, etc.).

Cons: imper­fect mobile app.

Pric­ing: A free tri­al is avail­able for all plans, with paid sub­scrip­tions start­ing at just $5 per user/​month. The Basic plan costs $100 per month for 20 users and includes unlim­it­ed projects, 2 GB of stor­age per user, cus­tom roles, advanced fil­ters, dash­boards, and reports. High­er-tier plans offer Gantt charts, time and bud­get track­ing, automa­tion, Kan­ban boards, API access, and more.

Worksection’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,9.

Click­Up

Click­Up is a great tool for smal­l­/mid-sized mar­ket­ing teams to orga­nize their workflow.

Pros: wide range of avail­able fea­tures (dash­boards, Gantt charts, Kan­ban board, track­ing sprints, mak­ing to-do/check-lists, doc­u­ments shar­ing, cal­en­dar, mes­sen­gers’ inte­gra­tion, team collaboration).

Cons: unnec­es­sary irri­tat­ing reminders, low con­trast UI, and fea­tures bugs 

Pric­ing: free mode with lim­its, paid ver­sion price start­ing at $12 per user/​month.

ClickUp’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,6.

Jira

It is a cloud-based man­age­ment tool, with a lot of fea­tures, which fits well for small and com­plex projects with Agile methodology.


Pros: a huge num­ber of fea­tures (Kan­ban board, Gantt chart, Sprint track­ing, user sto­ries, mes­sen­gers’ inte­gra­tion, doc­u­ment exchanges, project’s safe­ty, mobile app, etc.).

Cons: UI inter­face is too com­plex and heavy for nav­i­ga­tion, and mobile app with func­tion limitations.

Pric­ing: free plan with usage lim­its, and pay­ment starts at $9,70 per user/​month.

Jira’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4.5. 

Trel­lo

Trel­lo is well-known for its Kan­ban board, which is help­ful for task sta­tus monitoring. 

Pros: pos­si­bil­i­ty of mobile opti­miza­tion, task com­ments with label­ing, dead­line alerts, and very user-friend­ly UI.

Cons: fits well only small teams/​projects, and has a lot of lim­i­ta­tions for a free version. 

Pric­ing: stan­dard plan costs $6 per member/​month.

Trello’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,5.

Asana

Asana is a cloud-based man­age­ment soft­ware with a wide range of fea­tures, such as Gantt chart, work­flow builder, Kan­ban board, cal­en­dar, mile­stones visu­al­iza­tion, avail­able attach­ments, and etc. 

Pros: good inte­gra­tion with Slack, Gmail, Google Dri­ves, etc., con­ve­nient mobile app.

Cons: dif­fi­cul­ties with user adap­ta­tion, and lack of free functions. 

Pric­ing: free with lim­it­ed usage, paid ver­sion requires $13,49 per user/​month.

Asana’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,5.

ProofHub

ProofHub is a cloud-based pro­duc­tiv­i­ty man­age­ment tool with a wide range of fea­tures, such as Gantt charts, Kan­ban boards, cal­en­dars, task man­age­ment, mile­stones, time track­ing, team chat, file shar­ing, and project reports.


Pros: Flat-rate pric­ing for unlim­it­ed users, cen­tral­ized team col­lab­o­ra­tion, easy to use, and a vari­ety of project views.

Cons: Some users may find its third-par­ty inte­gra­tions limited. 

Pric­ing: A free tri­al is avail­able, and the Essen­tial plan costs a flat $45 per month for unlim­it­ed users when billed annually.

ProofHub’s 2026 rat­ing on Capter­ra is 4.6


nTask

This pro­duc­tiv­i­ty soft­ware helps with sched­ul­ing, man­age­ment, pri­or­i­ti­za­tion, and work­flow tracking. 

Pros: risk man­age­ment, man­u­al timesheets, meet­ing agen­da, issue pri­or­i­ty with updates, and report­ing with data visualization.

Cons: com­pli­cat­ed nav­i­ga­tion, and dif­fi­cult cal­en­dar integration. 

Pric­ing: pre­mi­um ver­sion starts with $4 per user/​month.

nTask 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,2.

Slack

Slack is a good place, where project’s com­mu­ni­ca­tion hap­pens. It allows any infor­ma­tion exchange, such as doc­u­ments, charts, videos, etc. 

Pros: a num­ber of mem­bers (up to 100), avail­able for iOS/​Android users, and well-inte­grat­ed with GoogleDisk, Office 360, Gmail, and even Atlassian’s prod­ucts (Trel­lo, Jira).

Cons: strange and con­fus­ing inter­face and imper­fect mobile app.

Pric­ing: free tri­al, and stan­dard plan, which starts with $8,75 user/​month.

Slack’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Zoho CRM

It fits well for small, mid­dle, and large busi­ness­es, whose key fea­tures include con­tact man­age­ment, sales fun­nels, pipeline man­age­ment, work­flow automa­tion, AI-pow­ered assis­tant, task man­age­ment, cus­tomer sup­port, report­ing with ana­lyt­ics, wide range inte­gra­tions, and others.

Pros: per­fect deploy­ment, easy admins, and user-friend­ly UI for new members.

Cons: lim­i­ta­tion of inte­gra­tion, lack of fonts, and some­times merg­ing wrong characters. 

Pric­ing: free up to 3 users, and offers $20 per user/​month for more.

Zoho’s CRM 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,3.

Todoist

Todoist is good for both team­work and indi­vid­ual productivity. 

Pros: mul­ti­ple set of fea­tures, its mobile app min­i­mal­is­tic design, com­fort nav­i­ga­tion, task del­e­ga­tion, pri­or­i­ti­za­tion, and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty visualization.

Cons: over­crowd­ed lists of tasks, which is very con­fus­ing, and free ver­sion with lim­it­ed functions. 

Pric­ing: Pro plan costs $7 per user/​month.

Todoist’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,6.

Avaza

Avaza fits well for mid-sized client-focused com­pa­nies. It’s good for man­ag­ing cus­tomer-fac­ing projects, track­ing time­lines and expenses. 

Pros: a lot of free fea­tures, easy team col­lab­o­ra­tion, and under­stand­able UI.

Cons: trou­bles with project offline work­ing and data synchronization. 

Pric­ing: free tri­al and paid ver­sions, which starts with $11,95 per user/​month.

Avaza’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,6.

Cage

Cage is a media col­lab­o­ra­tion and project man­age­ment tool for cre­ative small/​big in-house teams, agen­cies, as well as freelancers. 

Pros: min­i­mal­ist design, where only nec­es­sary fea­tures are pre­sent­ed (cal­en­dar, task track­ing, project mile­stones, sketch tool, flex­i­ble document/​message shar­ing, emo­ji pick­er, pre­sen­ta­tions, dash­board, and others). 

Cons: inabil­i­ty to cus­tomize pri­va­cy set­tings enough, free func­tions limits

Pric­ing: in addi­tion to the free ver­sion, a stan­dard plan starts with $8 per user/​month.

Cage’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Pay­mo

Pay­mo is good for smal­l­/mid-sized adver­tis­ing and mar­ket­ing agen­cies, web devel­op­ment teams, design com­pa­nies, and non-prof­it organizations.

Pros: Meta Kan­ban board, time-track­ers, task pri­or­i­ties, pomodoro timer, Gantt chart, file orga­ni­za­tion, and oth­er use­ful features. 

Cons: a lit­tle bit slow, and dif­fi­cult switch­ing between tasks.

Pric­ing: free tri­al is avail­able with lim­i­ta­tions, and pay­ment starts with $5,9 (after 3 month $9,9) per member/​month.

Paymo’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Notion

Notion is used for indi­vid­ual tasks, team’s projects, and enter­prise com­pa­nies, who roll work­flow with Agile and tra­di­tion­al approaches. 

Pros: a wide range of fea­tures (data import/​export, Gantt/​timeline view, Kan­ban board, to-do list, mile­stones track­ing, spread­sheet view, col­lab­o­ra­tion tools, bud­get man­age­ment, etc). 

Cons: a lit­tle bit glitch­ing, inac­cu­rate noti­fi­ca­tions, and hard way of communication. 

Pric­ing: free for indi­vid­ual using, but for more fea­tures and mem­bers you need to pay at least $12 per user/​month.

Notion’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Mon​day​.com

Mon​day​.com is a good for the Agile approach, and fits well dif­fer­ent teams/​projects.

Pros: wide range of use­ful fea­tures (work­flow automa­tion, email inte­gra­tion, Gantt chart, doc­u­ment admin­is­tra­tion, timesheet track­ing, etc), and eas­i­er team collaboration.

Cons: imper­fect mobile app, and con­fus­ing UI web. 

Pric­ing: free usage, for more fea­tures pay­ment is $12 per user/​month.

Mon​day​.com 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,6.

Base­camp

Base­camp is the best for small busi­ness, entre­pre­neurs, groups inside large orga­ni­za­tions, and freelancers. 

Pros: fine UI, usage sim­plic­i­ty, good inte­gra­tion sys­tem, and help­ful time man­age­ment tool. 

Cons: lack of task/​subtasks pri­or­i­ti­za­tion, mile­stones, and dif­fi­cul­ties with sev­er­al project management. 

Pric­ing: free tri­al, and sev­er­al pric­ing plans, which starts at $99 per team for a month.

Basecamp’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,3.

Scoro

Scoro helps to man­age projects, sales, time, finance, and reports. It is good for cre­ative teams.

Pros: well-designed web inter­face, easy to set­up, Gantt chart fea­ture, and sim­ple managing.

Cons: lim­it­ed inte­gra­tions with oth­ers, and unable to mod­i­fy some parameters.

Pric­ing: 14-days free tri­al, no cred­it card required, but after $17 per user/​month. 

Scoro’s 2026 rat­ing at cpter​ra​.com is 4,5.

Fleep

Fleep is a flex­i­ble mes­sen­ger, which allows team com­mu­ni­ca­tion and easy file sharing. 
Pros: flex­i­ble com­mu­ni­ca­tion, good ser­vice sup­port, a fea­ture-rich web-based chat man­ag­er, unlim­it­ed par­tic­i­pants, light­weight, easy to use.

Cons: a bit clum­sy voice call, no pinned notes, and some­times quite slow at responding.

Pric­ing: in addi­tion to free tri­al, busi­ness starts at $5,35 per user/​month.

Fleep’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Har­vest

Har­vest is good for plan­ning, sched­ul­ing, work­flow orga­niz­ing, and time managing.

Pros: pow­er­ful report­ing, accu­rate time-track­ing, sim­ple and intu­itive interface.

Cons: use­less cost track­ing, too expen­sive, doesn’t sup­port sun-tracks, imper­fect inte­gra­tion, no real-time phone sup­port, and quite lim­it­ed in-build fea­ture set.

Pric­ing: free plan for 1 user and 2 projects, and unlim­it­ed pro plan at $11 per seat/​month.

Harvest’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,5.

Red­booth

Red­booth is good for mar­ket­ing, cre­ative, IT and remote teams.

Pros: easy to del­e­gate & assign tasks, very user friend­ly & intu­itive inter­face, task orga­ni­za­tion, sim­ple set up, and the abil­i­ty to set autho­riza­tion levels.

Cons: con­fus­ing dash­board updates, hard track­ing & report­ing, imper­fect dash­board and lack of out­side integrations.

Pric­ing: free plan with lim­it­ed fea­tures, and paid ver­sion starts at $12 per user/​month.

Redbooth’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,4.

Nut­cache

Nut­cache soft­ware fits well teams of all sizes, and pro­vides time track­ing, project bud­get­ing, and expens­es management.

Pros: sim­ple set up, intu­itive inter­face, cus­tomiz­able work­flow, mile­stones set­ting and well-orga­nized tasks.

Cons: dif­fi­cult-to-use time trac­ing sec­tion, some glitch­es, imper­fect invoic­ing mod­el, hard report­ing and mobile ver­sion needs improvement. 

Pric­ing: free tri­al peri­od, paid ver­sion, which starts from $13,95 per user/​month.

Nutcache’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,4.

Time­Camp

It is a time-track­er for an unlim­it­ed user num­ber, which is best for B2B companies.

Pros: easy-to-use, low price, per­fect work plan­ning and under­stand­able progress tracking.

Cons: slow inte­gra­tion, less flex­i­bil­i­ty in report­ing and slow mobile app.

Pric­ing: starter ver­sion starts at $3,49 per user/​month.

TimeCamp’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Con­flu­ence

Con­flu­ence is an Atlassian’s tool for doc­u­ment man­ag­ing and exchanging.

Pros: ade­quate guide­lines, set of tem­plates, doc­u­ments shar­ing, per­fect inte­gra­tion and a huge cloud storage.

Cons: too many avail­able plu­g­ins, dif­fi­cult nav­i­ga­tion and imper­fect export tools. 

Pric­ing: free ver­sion up to 10 users, while a stan­dard plan costs about $7,15 per user/​month.

Confluence’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,5.

Func­tion­Fox

This pro­duc­tiv­i­ty tool is best for graph­ic design, adver­tis­ing, com­mu­ni­ca­tion, mul­ti­me­dia, pub­lic rela­tions, as well as marketing.

Pros: good cus­tomer sup­port, easy labor time track­ing, enabled work­flow and easy-to-learn.

Cons: hard learn­ing curve, a bulky inter­face, dif­fi­cult nav­i­ga­tion and imper­fect UI.

Pric­ing: in addi­tion to free tri­al, paid ver­sion is avail­able, start­ing at $12.75 per user/​month.

FunctionFox’s 2026 rat­ing at capter​ra​.com is 4,5.

Bees­busy

It is a good man­age­ment tool, which fits well for dif­fer­ent teams. 

Pros: access from all devices, great fea­tures set, and good cus­tomer support. 

Cons: impos­si­ble to oper­ate offline, a lit­tle bit con­fus­ing UI & navigation.

Pric­ing: free tri­al; a paid ver­sion starts at $12,50 per/​user month.

Bees­busy rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Craft​.io

It serves prod­uct teams and fits well for small and big companies.

Pros: very easy to nav­i­gate, user-friend­ly design, user can test all in one place, and intu­itive interface.

Cons: very expen­sive, plen­ty of bugs, painful inte­gra­tion, and weak roadmap features.

Pric­ing: free tri­al, pric­ing starts at $24 per user/​month.

Craft​.io rat­ting 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,4. 

Dia​grams​.net

Pre­vi­ous­ly called ​“Draw​.io”, this is a very pow­er­ful tool for team work and its pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. Best for flow­charts and UMLs creation.

Pros: great fea­tures set, very intu­itive design and easy-to-use. 

Cons: no offline ver­sion, cloud-based stor­age solutions.

Pric­ing: free version

Its rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,6.

Flow

It brings togeth­er tasks, projects, time­lines, and every­thing a project man­ag­er needs to man­age teamwork. 

Pros: great mobile access, fine Kan­ban board, task man­ag­ing, Gantt chart ang good integration.
Cons: non-user-friend­ly inter­face, a bit expen­sive price for avail­able set of fea­tures, too bug­gy and lack of updates.
Pric­ing: free ver­sion, a paid one starts at $8 per user/​month.

Flow’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,5.

Hey­Space

A good tool for team col­lab­o­ra­tion, which com­bines high-lev­el task man­age­ment and advanced chat features.

Pros: some users like that Hey­Space is a good com­bi­na­tion of Trel­lo and Slack at one place, it also has a sim­ple UI and Kan­ban board. 

Cons: lack of mobile app, unsta­ble on macOS, could be a lit­tle bit faster.

Pric­ing: free tri­al is avail­able, paid ver­sion starts at $5 per user/​month.

Its rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,8. 

Pro­duct­Plan

It helps cre­ate great project roadmaps & mile­stones, and inte­grates well with Atlassian’s prod­ucts and Slack.

Pros: board-friend­ly for­mat, easy-to-use, fast work­ing and well-integrated. 

Cons: absence of roll­back fea­ture, dif­fi­cult scrolling, a lit­tle bit con­fus­ing nav­i­ga­tion and UI.

Pric­ing: free ver­sion with fea­tures lim­its, and a paid one starts at $119 per editor/​month.

ProductPlan’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,4.

Rave­tree

It is a great work man­age­ment solu­tion for track­ing work­flow, time man­ag­ing, resource plan­ning, CRM and others.

Pros: The Agile func­tion­al­i­ty, eas­i­ly track mul­ti­ple projects, great man­age­ment features. 

Cons: lack of sta­bil­i­ty, and tech sup­port, a bit dif­fi­cult nav­i­ga­tion, over­whelm­ing due to the wide range of pos­si­bil­i­ties, and the CRM com­po­nent is not ful­ly inte­grat­ed with the project. 

Pric­ing: free ver­sion, pric­ing starts at $39 per user/​month.

Ravetree’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,5.

Back­log

Back­log is good for project man­age­ment, bug track­ing, and fits well for teams with dif­fer­ent user number.

Pros: great flex­i­bil­i­ty, easy-to-use, good nav­i­ga­tion, easy-to-set up, pow­er­ful Gantt and burn­down charts. 

Cons: some trou­bles with ver­i­fy­ing and fil­ter­ing, many issues are dupli­cat­ed, dif­fer­ent kinds of pri­or­i­ty are not enough. 

Pric­ing: free tri­al, and starter plan begins at $29,2 per user/​month.

Backlog’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,6.

Pro­duct­board

It is a type of good cus­tomer-dri­ven prod­uct man­age­ment sys­tem, which could be used by prod­uct man­agers, prod­uct teams, and dif­fer­ent prod­uct organizations.

Pros: very sim­ple to imple­ment, helps to build work­flow transparency. 

Cons: non-user-friend­ly UI, a bit hard nav­i­ga­tion, imper­fect inte­gra­tion abil­i­ty, and pret­ty weak cus­tomer feed­back management.

Pric­ing: free tri­al, a paid ver­sion starts at $25 per user/​month. 

Productboard’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Team­hood

It is a col­lab­o­ra­tion plat­form, which fits well for prod­uct devel­op­ment teams, Agile soft­ware devel­op­ment teams, mar­ket­ing and oth­er team types.

Pros: con­fig­urable Kan­ban board, effi­cient use of screen space, good cus­tomer ser­vice, and easy-to-use.

Cons: a bit inac­cu­rate time track­ing, no pos­si­bil­i­ty to send reminder emails, and lack of integrations.

Pric­ing: free tri­al, paid ver­sions begin from $11 per user/​month.

Teamhood’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,9.

Lucidspark

This is a vir­tu­al white­board, where teams can bring their ideas and dis­cuss them. Lucidspark is a very pow­er­ful instru­ment for brainstorming.

Pros: easy-to-use, pro­vides step-by-step instruc­tions, and there are many avail­able templates.

Cons: some facil­i­ta­tion fea­tures miss­ing, a lit­tle tricky file orga­ni­za­tion, not flex­i­ble pric­ing plan, lack of Kan­ban board, and some­times it is dif­fi­cult to select, and move some group of objects. 

Pric­ing: free ver­sion, with paid one start­ing at $9 per user/​month.

Lucidspark’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Metro Retro

This is a spe­cial real-time board for ret­ro­spec­tive mak­ing, which fits very well for Scrum teams.

Pros: pow­er­ful instru­ment for brain­storm­ing, very user-friend­ly inter­face, which make it easy-to-use.

Cons: fea­tures set is lim­it­ed for free ver­sion, lack of tem­plates, non-set­up for long-form writing. 

Pric­ing: free ver­sion is avail­able, pric­ing start­ing from $5 per user/​month.

Metro Retro’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,3. 

Miro

Miro is anoth­er white­board, which is great for a team’s brain­storm­ing, because it allows to cre­ate dif­fer­ent schemes, flow­charts and diagrams. 

Pros: great set of tem­plates, easy nav­i­ga­tion, user-friend­ly and under­stand­able UI.

Cons: slow video upload­ing, text tool is a bit lim­it­ed, and slow down­load­ing for big­ger boards. 

Pric­ing: free ver­sion with lim­it­ed board’s num­ber, pric­ing starts at $10 per user/​month.

Miro’ rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Basaas

This pro­duc­tiv­i­ty man­ag­er is good for enter­prise com­pa­nies, and pro­vides SaaS solutions.

Pros: easy to under­stand, great nav­i­ga­tion, and use­ful dashboard.

Cons: imper­fect noti­fi­ca­tions, miss­ing option ​“search on this page”.

Pric­ing: free tri­al is avail­able, a paid ver­sion begins from $6,50 per user/​month.

Basaas rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,8.

Airtable

Airtable is the best for pro­duc­tiv­i­ty man­age­ment and col­lab­o­ra­tion, at small busi­ness, and teams with­in a larg­er organization. 
Pros: all-in-one col­lab­o­ra­tion plat­form, board per­son­al­iza­tion, assign­ments can be eas­i­ly del­e­gat­ed, cheap price for avail­able fea­tures set. 

Cons: a bit com­pli­cat­ed UI, lack of fea­tures, imper­fect work with iOS appli­ca­tions, text-for­mat­ting option is not-avail­able, long set up and lim­it­ed capabilities. 

Pric­ing: free tri­al, $24 per user/​month for a paid version.

Airtable’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,7.

Float

Float is a good col­lab­o­ra­tion tool for dis­trib­uted and remote teams. 

Pros: log­i­cal user inter­face, detailed report­ing func­tion, con­stant improve­ments & updates, easy access and abil­i­ty to sync to calendar. 

Cons: slow, a bit bug­gy, unsuit­able for man­ag­ing project bud­get, and imper­fect time report integration. 

Pric­ing: a free ver­sion, a paid one begins from $8,50 per user/​month.

Float’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,5.

Taskworld

It is good for col­lab­o­ra­tion, idea shar­ing, and total project management. 

Pros: very sim­ple to learn and use, option of task’s dura­tion is avail­able, mul­ti-lev­el chat, and UI is sim­ple for under­stand­ing and navigation.

Cons: lack of Gantt chart func­tion, imper­fect tech sup­port, some­times it gets frozen, no report mod­ule, too expen­sive for the fea­ture set which is presented.

Pric­ing: free tri­al is avail­able; pric­ing starts at $19 per user/​month.

Taskworld’s rat­ing 2026 at capter​ra​.com is 4,5. 

Of the many options for man­ag­ing your pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, you should choose only the ones that fit your project type and style of work. To do this, you need to under­stand your project, your team’s work style clear­ly, and the high­est pri­or­i­ty for you right now (for exam­ple, com­mu­ni­ca­tion and infor­ma­tion shar­ing, track­ing work­flow and time spent, or all togeth­er). In this way, you will find the best pro­duc­tiv­i­ty software. 
⇆

esc
Share
или
PM school
Experts in all fields talk about the importance of flexibility. When it comes to project management, it is the flexibility of the team and the software it uses that allows to get rid of the main problems...
1 November 2026   •   17 min read
PM school
Team collaboration software has become essential in an era where remote and hybrid work environments are the new standard. These tools are vital for improving communication, resource sharing, and streamlining...
22 October 2026   •   11 min read
PM school
As startups grow, they need software that is flexible, scalable, and cost-effective to help them manage their projects efficiently. In this guide, we'll explore the top project management software for...
22 October 2026   •   12 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂