•     •   17 min read

10 best alternatives to Wrike in 2025

Wrike is a pop­u­lar project man­age­ment ser­vice. It is espe­cial­ly in demand among medi­um and large teams due to its flex­i­ble work­flow set­up and the abil­i­ty to inte­grate with oth­er systems.
How­ev­er, some users may look for Wrike analogs to find a more con­ve­nient and afford­able solution.

Why are users look­ing for alter­na­tives to Wrike?

Wrike is a ver­sa­tile project man­age­ment tool, but the ser­vice does not always meet the expec­ta­tions of all users. There are sev­er­al rea­sons why com­pa­nies con­sid­er switch­ing to oth­er platforms.

Dif­fi­cul­ty of adaptation

Wrike has a large num­ber of fea­tures and a mul­ti-lev­el inter­face struc­ture. This can be a prob­lem for begin­ners. It takes time to adapt and learn to ful­ly use the service.

It is espe­cial­ly dif­fi­cult to cus­tomize the sys­tem to your needs with­out pri­or train­ing. As a result, teams may face a sit­u­a­tion where the time to mas­ter the plat­form exceeds the allo­cat­ed resources for implementation.

Exten­sive functionality

Some users note that Wrike pro­vides more fea­tures than are need­ed for basic project man­age­ment. This leads to a sit­u­a­tion where sim­ple projects acquire addi­tion­al ele­ments, com­pli­cat­ing process management.

Teams that only need basic plan­ning and task track­ing should con­sid­er oth­er Wrike analogs.

High cost of scaling

As the num­ber of par­tic­i­pants increas­es, the cost increas­es. For small busi­ness­es and star­tups, this can be a big blow to the bud­get. That’s why many are look­ing for more afford­able Wrike alter­na­tives with flex­i­ble pric­ing plans.

Lack of live chat support

For many users, it is impor­tant to receive quick answers to ques­tions, espe­cial­ly at the ini­tial stage of imple­men­ta­tion. For exam­ple, Work­sec­tion offers 247 live sup­port with access to experts at all stages of using the plat­form. This allows cus­tomers to quick­ly resolve issues and focus on their busi­ness processes.

How do oth­er tools solve these problems?

If a team needs flex­i­bil­i­ty in cus­tomiza­tion with­out unnec­es­sary ele­ments, Work­sec­tion can be a great alter­na­tive. This tool com­bines key project man­age­ment fea­tures such as kan­ban boards, Gantt charts, and task man­age­ment with­out over­whelm­ing users with unnec­es­sary detail. An addi­tion­al advan­tage is the built-in time track­er, which is espe­cial­ly use­ful for hourly teams.

For com­plex and large-scale projects with a large struc­tur­al com­po­nent, Click­Up is a good choice. It allows you to cre­ate detailed work­flows and set up mul­ti-lev­el process­es. How­ev­er, due to its mul­ti­func­tion­al­i­ty, the plat­form requires more time to adapt com­pared to lighter alternatives.

Devel­op­ment teams that val­ue DevOps sup­port and flex­i­ble Agile method­ol­o­gy can choose Jira. It pro­vides advanced fea­tures for sprint man­age­ment, bug track­ing, and inte­gra­tion with CI/CD tools. This makes it espe­cial­ly use­ful for IT projects, but for non-tech­ni­cal users, it may seem over­ly complicated.

When the main task is to orga­nize a knowl­edge base and struc­ture data, Notion comes to the res­cue. This tool allows you to cre­ate work­spaces with dif­fer­ent con­tent for­mats, com­bin­ing doc­u­men­ta­tion, tasks, and notes in one place. For com­pa­nies seek­ing flex­i­bil­i­ty in cre­at­ing their own knowl­edge bases, Notion will be a con­ve­nient solution.

For those who val­ue min­i­mal­ism and con­cise­ness, Base­camp is a good choice. This ser­vice allows you to focus on core tasks and com­mu­ni­ca­tion with­out unnec­es­sary com­plex­i­ty. It’s ide­al for small teams and projects with a clear hier­ar­chy and no need for com­plex settings.

Cri­te­ria for choos­ing a project man­age­ment system

When choos­ing a project man­age­ment sys­tem, it is impor­tant to con­sid­er the needs of the team and the specifics of the busi­ness. If you’re look­ing for alter­na­tives to Wrike, con­sid­er plat­forms with a sim­pler inter­face and flex­i­ble settings.

If you’re won­der­ing where to move on from Wrike, con­sid­er pro­grams sim­i­lar to Wrike: Work­sec­tion, Asana, Click­Up, and Trel­lo. These tools can be the best alter­na­tive due to the opti­mal com­bi­na­tion of fea­tures and convenience.

Find the best project man­age­ment tool based on your tasks and team­work requirements.

1️⃣Team size

The first fac­tor to con­sid­er when choos­ing a task man­ag­er is the num­ber of team mem­bers. If you’re work­ing in a small group of up to 10 peo­ple, you should give pref­er­ence to light­weight and intu­itive solu­tions with basic task man­age­ment fea­tures. Such plat­forms should offer a quick start and min­i­mal cus­tomiza­tion. For exam­ple, tools with kan­ban boards and the abil­i­ty to track tasks with­out unnec­es­sary automa­tion will be quite sufficient.

When a team has 50 – 100 peo­ple or more, the task becomes more com­pli­cat­ed. In this case, you need a pow­er­ful sys­tem with flex­i­ble role and access set­tings, as well as the abil­i­ty to scale projects. In addi­tion, it is impor­tant to con­sid­er that the plat­form can sup­port col­lab­o­ra­tion with a large num­ber of par­tic­i­pants with­out reduc­ing pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. In this case, solu­tions with advanced project man­age­ment func­tions and built-in report­ing are suitable.

2️⃣Specifics of busi­ness and busi­ness processes

Dif­fer­ent indus­tries require dif­fer­ent approach­es to project man­age­ment. For exam­ple, IT teams need sup­port for Agile method­olo­gies (Kan­ban, Scrum), bug track­ing capa­bil­i­ties, and inte­gra­tions with DevOps tools. At the same time, mar­ket­ing and cre­ative teams pre­fer visu­al inter­faces with flex­i­ble task orga­ni­za­tion, the abil­i­ty to cre­ate con­tent plans, and data­base management.

If your com­pa­ny is engaged in project work with exter­nal clients, you should choose a plat­form with the abil­i­ty to invite third-par­ty par­tic­i­pants and set up access rights. This will help you avoid data leaks and main­tain con­trol over your processes.

3️⃣The need for cus­tomiza­tion and automation

Depend­ing on the inter­nal struc­ture of the com­pa­ny, you may need to cus­tomize your work­flows. If you have sev­er­al teams with dif­fer­ent tasks, it is impor­tant to choose a plat­form with flex­i­ble cus­tomiza­tion options. This will allow you to cre­ate your own work­spaces, cus­tomize dash­boards, and auto­mate rou­tine processes.

Automa­tion is espe­cial­ly rel­e­vant for ser­vice teams that work on reg­u­lar projects with repet­i­tive tasks. In this case, the plat­form should sup­port the cre­ation of tem­plates, auto­mat­ic reminders, and trig­gers to per­form cer­tain actions.

4️⃣Inte­gra­tions with oth­er tools

Mod­ern work­flows require syn­chro­niza­tion with appli­ca­tions. These can be CRM sys­tems, cloud stor­age, doc­u­ment man­age­ment tools, or team com­mu­ni­ca­tion plat­forms. When choos­ing a task man­ag­er, make sure that it sup­ports inte­gra­tion with the main ser­vices already used by your team.

Plat­forms that sup­port inte­gra­tion through APIs or pop­u­lar con­nec­tors such as Zapi­er are espe­cial­ly con­ve­nient. This allows you to auto­mate the trans­fer of data between sys­tems and reduces the work­load on your team.

5️⃣Easy to learn

The last but not least aspect is the ease of imple­men­ta­tion and learn­ing of the sys­tem. If the team spends a lot of time on train­ing, it reduces pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and can cause rejec­tion of inno­va­tions. Choose a plat­form with an intu­itive inter­face and the abil­i­ty to adapt to the lev­el of tech­ni­cal train­ing of employees.

A good indi­ca­tor is built-in train­ing mate­ri­als, demos, and sup­port dur­ing the imple­men­ta­tion phase. If the plat­form pro­vides a quick start with min­i­mal set­up, it is bet­ter suit­ed for teams that want to get start­ed right away.

The choice of a project man­age­ment sys­tem depends on many fac­tors: from team size to busi­ness specifics. It is impor­tant to focus on real needs and con­sid­er the pos­si­bil­i­ty of adapt­ing the plat­form to grow­ing tasks. Choose a tool with flex­i­ble set­tings, inte­gra­tions, and a clear inter­face to ensure team pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and com­fort­able project management.

The best alter­na­tives to Wrike in 2025

In 2025, many alter­na­tives to Wrike will appear on the mar­ket, each offer­ing its own advan­tages. Let’s look at the best solu­tions and com­pare their func­tion­al­i­ty to help you make the best choice.

Work­sec­tion

Work­sec­tion is an afford­able project man­age­ment tool that’s per­fect for busi­ness­es of all sizes. Thanks to its intu­itive inter­face and built-in plan­ning tools, Work­sec­tion allows you to effec­tive­ly orga­nize process­es with­out unnec­es­sary complexity.


This sys­tem is often the choice of teams that val­ue ease of use and functionality.

CostThere is a free planPrice from $3.4 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Project man­age­ment tools
    Work­sec­tion offers all the nec­es­sary basic fea­tures: kan­ban boards, Gantt charts, task man­age­ment, and a built-in cal­en­dar. This makes it con­ve­nient for plan­ning both short-term and long-term projects.
  2. Set­ting up access­es and invit­ing clients
    The plat­form allows you to cre­ate work­spaces with dif­fer­ent lev­els of access, which is espe­cial­ly use­ful for col­lab­o­rat­ing with clients. You can eas­i­ly invite exter­nal users to a project and con­trol their rights.
  3. Hourly for ser­vice busi­ness­es
    For teams work­ing on hourly rates, the built-in time track­er in Work­sec­tion will be an impor­tant advan­tage. It allows you to take into account the time spent on tasks, which helps you accu­rate­ly cal­cu­late the cost of projects and con­trol the workload.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

The main func­tions of Work­sec­tion are already built into the sys­tem, so you don’t need to cus­tomize or con­nect plu­g­ins. This is espe­cial­ly con­ve­nient for small and medi­um-sized teams that val­ue ease of use.

Pros and cons.

Pros:
  • Built-in time track­er that allows you to record time spent on tasks and projects.
  • Afford­able pric­ing com­pared to competitors.
  • Sup­port from experts at all stages of implementation.
  • Abil­i­ty to switch between dif­fer­ent for­mats for dis­play­ing tasks in one project: list, kan­ban board, Gantt chart.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • No built-in tem­plates for tasks like some competitors.
  • Less deep cus­tomiza­tion options com­pared to Wrike.

Click­Up

Click­Up is a project man­age­ment ser­vice aimed at large com­pa­nies and teams with diverse tasks.


Its pop­u­lar­i­ty is due to its flex­i­bil­i­ty and rich set of fea­tures that allow you to cus­tomize work­flows to meet spe­cif­ic busi­ness needs. How­ev­er, mas­ter­ing all the fea­tures requires time and effort.
CostThere is a free planPrice from $7 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Mul­ti-lev­el task struc­ture
    Sup­ports the cre­ation of tasks, sub­tasks, and check­lists, which allows you to break down projects into small com­po­nents and eas­i­ly mon­i­tor their progress.
  2. Process automa­tion
    Tools for cre­at­ing auto­mat­ed sce­nar­ios and chains of actions to help reduce rou­tine operations.
  3. Switch­able views
    The abil­i­ty to work with tasks in a list, kan­ban board, cal­en­dar, or Gantt chart format.

The main dif­fer­ence from Vrice

Click­Up offers more options for cus­tomiz­ing work­flows and cre­at­ing automa­tions. The sys­tem allows you to cus­tomize almost all ele­ments of the sys­tem to your tasks, which makes it con­ve­nient for teams with var­i­ous processes.

Pros and cons

Advan­tages:
  • Wide range of set­tings and views.
  • Abil­i­ty to auto­mate tasks with­out using third-par­ty plugins.
  • Ver­sa­til­i­ty for dif­fer­ent teams and projects.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • Dif­fi­cult to learn for new users.
  • Lack of live tech­ni­cal sup­port for user consultation.

Asana

Asana is a flex­i­ble team and project man­age­ment plat­form pop­u­lar with medi­um and large teams.


It pro­vides con­ve­nient tools for plan­ning work, mon­i­tor­ing progress, and orga­niz­ing team activities.
Its ease of use and many inte­gra­tions make Asana pop­u­lar in var­i­ous fields.
CostThere is a free planPrice from $10.99 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Plan­ning and track­ing
    Tasks can be grouped into projects and sub­tasks with check­lists and tags.
  2. Real-time col­lab­o­ra­tion
    Abil­i­ty to com­ment on tasks, assign respon­si­bil­i­ties, and track progress on dashboards.
  3. Inte­gra­tions with pop­u­lar ser­vices
    Sup­port for con­nect­ing to Google Work­space, Slack, and oth­er tools.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

Asana is focused on sim­pli­fy­ing project man­age­ment through an intu­itive inter­face and visu­al con­trol. The ser­vice is suit­able for teams that need real-time col­lab­o­ra­tive plan­ning and control.

Pros and cons

Advan­tages:
  • Con­ve­nient sys­tem for cre­at­ing and assign­ing tasks.
  • Flex­i­ble project man­age­ment with visu­al­iza­tion in the form of a list, board, or calendar.
  • Inte­gra­tions with pop­u­lar col­lab­o­ra­tion tools.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • The time track­er func­tion for track­ing work­ing hours is avail­able only on the Advanced plan.
  • The price may be too high for star­tups and teams with a lim­it­ed budget.

Trel­lo

Trel­lo is a pop­u­lar ana­log of Wrike. This Kan­ban tool is suit­able for small teams and projects. It’s easy to use and ide­al for visu­al task management.


How­ev­er, due to its lim­it­ed func­tion­al­i­ty, it may not be suit­able for large projects with a mul­ti-lev­el structure.

CostThere is a free planPrice from $5 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Kan­ban boards
    The main for­mat for work­ing with tasks that allows you to visu­al­ize process­es and track progress.
  2. Check­lists and labels
    Con­ve­nient man­age­ment of sub­tasks and cat­e­go­riza­tion of tasks.
  3. Pow­er-Ups
    Inte­gra­tions with Google Dri­ve, Slack, and oth­er tools to extend your capabilities.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

Trel­lo is focused on sim­plic­i­ty and visu­al dis­play of tasks. The sys­tem does not sup­port mul­ti-lev­el task struc­ture and com­plex automa­tion sce­nar­ios, which makes it more con­ve­nient for small teams with sim­ple processes.

Pros and cons

Advan­tages:
  • Easy to learn and intu­itive interface.
  • Con­ve­nience of visu­al con­trol with kan­ban boards.
  • Abil­i­ty to use Pow­er-Ups to expand functionality.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • Not enough pow­er­ful tools for com­plex projects.
  • Lim­it­ed automa­tion and ana­lyt­ics capabilities.

Monday.com

Monday.com is a visu­al project and task man­age­ment plat­form that has proven to be a con­ve­nient solu­tion for teams with dif­fer­ent types of workflows.


It sup­ports flex­i­ble work­space cre­ation and visu­al­iza­tion with cus­tomiz­able boards and dashboards.
CostThere is a free planPrice from $9.8 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  • Visu­al boards
    Kan­ban, time­lines, and cal­en­dars allow you to orga­nize tasks and projects in a con­ve­nient way.
  • Process automa­tion
    Inte­grate with var­i­ous appli­ca­tions and cre­ate auto­mat­ed sce­nar­ios to increase productivity.
  • Col­lab­o­ra­tion
    The abil­i­ty to share projects, assign tasks, and track the progress of the entire team on one screen.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

Monday.com focus­es on visu­al­iza­tion and clar­i­ty of work­flows. This makes it con­ve­nient for teams with cre­ative and mar­ket­ing tasks where ease of inter­ac­tion is important.

Pros and cons

Advan­tages:
  • Visu­al process management.
  • Easy to learn thanks to an intu­itive interface.
  • Ample oppor­tu­ni­ties for cre­at­ing automa­tions and connections.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • High cost on advanced plans.
  • Automa­tion may require cus­tomiza­tion, which is time-consuming.

Jira

Jira is a project man­age­ment plat­form focused on IT teams and soft­ware devel­op­ment processes.


The sys­tem is wide­ly used in the Agile envi­ron­ment due to the sup­port of Scrum and Kan­ban method­olo­gies. It may seem dif­fi­cult for begin­ners to mas­ter, espe­cial­ly if the team has not used such sys­tems before.

CostThere is a free plan Price from $8.15 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Agile sup­port
    The plat­form pro­vides a wide range of oppor­tu­ni­ties for work­ing with Scrum and Kan­ban method­olo­gies. You can cre­ate Scrum boards, orga­nize sprints, man­age the back­log, and track the progress of tasks at each stage.
  2. Bug track­ing and ver­sion con­trol
    Jira allows you to keep a detailed record of errors and bugs, assign respon­si­bil­i­ties, and mon­i­tor the sta­tus of their cor­rec­tion. In addi­tion, built-in ver­sion con­trol tools help you track changes and main­tain up-to-date builds.
  3. Inte­gra­tion with DevOps
    The plat­form sup­ports the con­nec­tion of CI/CD tools such as Jenk­ins and Bit­buck­et. This makes it eas­i­er to man­age con­tin­u­ous devel­op­ment and deliv­ery process­es, improv­ing col­lab­o­ra­tion between teams.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

Jira pro­vides deep cus­tomiza­tion for IT project man­age­ment, includ­ing DevOps sup­port and bug track­ing. Wrike is more suit­able for project man­age­ment in busi­ness teams with a focus on flex­i­bil­i­ty and automation.

Pros and cons

Advan­tages:
  • Deep inte­gra­tion with DevOps platforms.
  • Flex­i­ble set­tings for work­ing with Scrum and Kan­ban methodologies.
  • Sup­port for large projects with nest­ed tasks and connections.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • Dif­fi­cult for non-tech­ni­cal users.
  • Long train­ing and team adaptation.

Notion

The next pos­si­ble replace­ment for Wrike is Notion, a flex­i­ble tool for cre­at­ing knowl­edge bases and man­ag­ing tasks. It is dis­tin­guished by the fact that it allows you to build struc­tured doc­u­ments, data­bas­es, and projects in one workspace.


Suit­able for cre­ative and admin­is­tra­tive teams, but can be dif­fi­cult to set up when work­ing with large amounts of data.

CostThere is a free planPrice from $10 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Knowl­edge bases and doc­u­ments
    Notion allows you to cre­ate pages with text con­tent, tables, mul­ti­me­dia ele­ments, and embed­ded blocks. This makes it easy to main­tain doc­u­men­ta­tion, cre­ate inter­nal wikis, and store impor­tant data in a struc­tured way.
  2. Task man­age­ment
    The tool sup­ports adding check­lists, sub­tasks, and sta­tus­es to each task. This allows you to mon­i­tor the progress of work and del­e­gate responsibility.
  3. Flex­i­ble data­base cus­tomiza­tion
    Notion pro­vides var­i­ous options for dis­play­ing infor­ma­tion, such as tables, boards, and cal­en­dars. This helps to visu­al­ize tasks in the most con­ve­nient for­mat and effec­tive­ly orga­nize workflows.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

Notion is great at doc­u­ment­ing process­es, orga­niz­ing a knowl­edge base, and visu­al­iz­ing data. At the same time, the ser­vice does­n’t pro­vide basic tools for man­ag­ing com­plex projects like Worksection.

Pros and cons

Advan­tages:
  • Ver­sa­til­i­ty of use: from task man­age­ment to documentation.
  • Mul­ti­func­tion­al data­bas­es and sup­port for var­i­ous dis­play formats.
  • Con­ve­nient knowl­edge base main­te­nance and infor­ma­tion structuring.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • Few­er func­tions for man­ag­ing com­plex projects.
  • Requires time to mas­ter due to the vari­ety of features.

Base­camp

Base­camp is a pop­u­lar solu­tion for small teams focused on sim­plic­i­ty and ease of use. This tool is suit­able for those look­ing for a min­i­mal­ist approach to project man­age­ment with­out unnec­es­sary features.


Base­camp offers a basic set of tools for plan­ning and team­work, includ­ing tasks, dis­cus­sions, and file storage.

Cost
There is a free plan
Price from $15 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Task man­age­ment
    Cre­ate sim­ple task lists with the abil­i­ty to add respon­si­ble per­sons and deadlines.
  2. Team chats and dis­cus­sions
    Built-in forums and chats allow you to orga­nize dis­cus­sions with­in the project with­out using third-par­ty messengers.
  3. Shared cal­en­dar
    Helps you plan events, meet­ings, and dead­lines on one screen, mak­ing it easy to coordinate.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

Base­camp empha­sizes sim­plic­i­ty and con­ve­nience, focus­ing on min­i­mal­ism in func­tion­al­i­ty. It offers ease of use and sup­ports team­work with­out unnec­es­sary complexity.

Pros and cons

Pros:
  • Ease of use for small teams.
  • Easy to learn thanks to an intu­itive interface.
  • Focus on com­mu­ni­ca­tion and collaboration.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • Lim­it­ed cus­tomiza­tion options.
  • Few built-in inte­gra­tions com­pared to competitors.

Zoho Projects

Zoho Projects is a part of the Zoho ecosys­tem focused on project and task man­age­ment. The plat­form is suit­able for those who are already active­ly using oth­er Zoho products.


It allows you to orga­nize work­flows with flex­i­ble plan­ning, con­trol, and report­ing tools.

PriceThere is a free planPrice from $4.3 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Task man­age­ment
    Cre­ate tasks, sub­tasks, and pri­or­i­tize them based on deadlines.
  2. Inte­gra­tion with Zoho ser­vices
    Eas­i­ly syn­chro­nizes with oth­er Zoho prod­ucts such as CRM and accounting.
  3. Reports and ana­lyt­ics
    Cre­ate Gantt charts and ana­lyt­i­cal reports to mon­i­tor project progress.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

Zoho Projects is inte­grat­ed into the Zoho ecosys­tem. This makes the ser­vice more con­ve­nient for users who already work with oth­er Zoho applications.

Pros and cons

Pros:
  • Inte­gra­tion with oth­er Zoho services.
  • Flex­i­ble report­ing customization.
  • Project man­age­ment sup­port with progress visualization.
Cons:
  • The inter­face may seem com­pli­cat­ed for new users.
  • Some fea­tures are only avail­able on paid plans.

Meis­ter­Task

Meis­ter­Task is a sim­ple and visu­al­ly pleas­ing task man­ag­er aimed at small teams. The main focus is on kan­ban boards and visu­al project management.


The plat­form offers basic tools for orga­niz­ing work with an empha­sis on visu­al­iza­tion and flexibility.
Cost There is a free plan Price from $7 per user per month

Key fea­tures

  1. Kan­ban boards
    Visu­al­iza­tion of tasks with the abil­i­ty to move cards between stages.
  2. Process automa­tion
    Cus­tomiz­able rules to sim­pli­fy repet­i­tive actions.
  3. Reports and dash­boards
    Mon­i­tor­ing task com­ple­tion and project progress.

The main dif­fer­ence from Wrike

Meis­ter­Task is focused on visu­al task man­age­ment. Its intu­itive inter­face and ease of use make it con­ve­nient for small teams.

Pros and cons

Pros:
  • Sim­ple and pleas­ant interface.
  • Easy to use with­out long training.
  • Suit­able for small teams with visu­al task management.
Dis­ad­van­tages:
  • Lim­it­ed func­tion­al­i­ty for large projects.
  • Few ana­lyt­i­cal tools com­pared to competitors.

Com­par­a­tive table of the best alter­na­tives to Wrike

To make it eas­i­er to choose among pop­u­lar Wrike alter­na­tives, we’ve pre­pared a handy com­par­i­son table. It con­tains the main para­me­ters: opti­mal team size, scope, and min­i­mum cost per user.

This way, you can quick­ly eval­u­ate the capa­bil­i­ties of each plat­form and choose the one that best suits your business.

NameOpti­mal team sizeSuit­able for what tasksMin­i­mum price per user
Work­sec­tion
Small and medi­um-sized businesses
Project man­age­ment, teamwork
From $3.4 per month
Click­Up
Medi­um and large teams
Task man­ag­er, cre­ation of Gantt charts
From $7 per month
Asana
Medi­um and large teams
Task plan­ning, process visualization
From $10.99 per month
Trel­lo
Small and medi­um teams
Kan­ban board, visu­al task management
From $5 per month
Monday.com
Medi­um and large teams
Project man­age­ment, CRM, visualization
From $9.8 per month
Jira
IT teams and developers
Project man­age­ment, bug track­ing, DevOps
From $8.15 per month
Notion
Cre­ative and non-tech­ni­cal teams
Main­tain­ing a knowl­edge base,
col­lab­o­ra­tive work
From $10 per month
Base­camp
Small teams and freelancers
Sim­ple project man­age­ment, communication
From $15 per month
Zoho Projects
Small and medi­um businesses
Project man­age­ment, task planning
From $4.3 per month
Meis­ter­Task
Small teams
Visu­al task man­age­ment, kanban
From $7 per month

Which plat­form to choose in 2025?

Uni­ver­sal solu­tions for most businesses

If you need an all-in-one solu­tion that will be equal­ly effec­tive for small teams and large projects, con­sid­er Work­sec­tion, Asana, or Click­Up. These plat­forms offer a wide range of fea­tures for man­ag­ing tasks and projects, but remain intu­itive even for new users.

Work­sec­tion stands out for its user-friend­ly task man­age­ment and process visu­al­iza­tion, includ­ing kan­ban boards, Gantt charts, and cal­en­dars. Click­Up is attrac­tive for its flex­i­ble cus­tomiza­tion and sup­port for dif­fer­ent method­olo­gies, while Asana makes it easy to man­age both short-term and long-term projects.

Team­work and collaboration

For teams that empha­size col­lab­o­ra­tion and exchange of ideas, Work­sec­tion and Base­camp are good choic­es. Work­sec­tion offers tools for effec­tive team com­mu­ni­ca­tion, such as com­ments and chats in tasks, as well as visu­al­iza­tion of process­es in con­ve­nient for­mats. Base­camp focus­es on orga­niz­ing team­work with­out over­load­ing the inter­face, pro­vid­ing sim­ple but effec­tive tools for coor­di­nat­ing tasks and discussions.

Best solu­tions for small businesses

Small com­pa­nies often choose tools with a min­i­mum entry thresh­old and afford­able pric­ing. Ease of use and func­tion­al­i­ty make Work­sec­tion, Trel­lo, and Meis­ter­Task the best options. These sys­tems offer basic task man­age­ment capa­bil­i­ties that allow you to main­tain order even on a lim­it­ed budget.

The choice for IT teams

If your team works in devel­op­ment or IT, you should con­sid­er Jira and Mon­day. These plat­forms are focused on flex­i­ble project man­age­ment method­olo­gies (Scrum, Kan­ban) and offer built-in tools for back­log con­trol and sprint man­age­ment. Jira is espe­cial­ly appre­ci­at­ed by devel­op­ers for its inte­gra­tion with CI/CD tools and bug tracking.

Solu­tions with a min­i­mum cost

If your goal is to min­i­mize costs, con­sid­er Work­sec­tion and Trel­lo. These tools offer free plans for small teams and flex­i­ble terms at the start. Even as your team expands, their cost remains low­er than many com­peti­tors, while retain­ing all the basic fea­tures for effec­tive project management.

Fre­quent­ly Asked Ques­tions (FAQ)

What is the best alter­na­tive to Wrike for small businesses?

For small teams, Work­sec­tion is the best choice because it offers an intu­itive inter­face, flex­i­ble cus­tomiza­tion, and afford­able pric­ing. Trel­lo and Meis­ter­Task are also worth con­sid­er­ing, as they offer visu­al boards and easy task management.

Are there any free alter­na­tives to Wrike?

Yes, there are sev­er­al free alter­na­tives to Wrike. Among them are Work­sec­tion, Trel­lo, and Asana. They offer basic project and task man­age­ment fea­tures with­out the need to pay for a sub­scrip­tion, which makes them con­ve­nient for star­tups and small teams.

How is Work­sec­tion dif­fer­ent from Wrike?

Work­sec­tion offers a more intu­itive inter­face and built-in tools for hourly account­ing, which is use­ful for ser­vice com­pa­nies. Unlike Wrike, which is focused on com­plex projects with cus­tom reports and set­tings, Work­sec­tion is more suit­able for small and medi­um-sized busi­ness­es due to its ease of use and afford­able price.

esc
Share
или
Business-cases
The Arsenal Insurance team consists of about a thousand people with divisions all over Ukraine. The head office employs over 150 people in more than 10 departments — including lawyers, financiers, accountants...
26 January 2026   •   5 min read
PM school
Task managers have become an integral part of team work. According to data from Cloudwards, small businesses spend an average of $8.9 per user per month on such services, while the average spend is about...
9 September 2025   •   9 min read
PM school
Modern teams spend too much time on communication — not always effective. According to data from Grammarly, an average of 7.5 hours a week is wasted just exchanging information through chats, emails,...
27 August 2025   •   8 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂