•   9 min read

Top 10 Alternatives to Microsoft Project in 2026

Microsoft Project still remains a cor­po­rate clas­sic, but its high licens­ing cost, com­plex­i­ty to learn, and lengthy imple­men­ta­tion time com­pel com­pa­nies to seek alter­na­tives. Small and medi­um busi­ness­es, agen­cies, and prod­uct teams require flex­i­bil­i­ty, quick set­up, and trans­par­ent pric­ing. Below you will find the top ten Microsoft Project alter­na­tives in 2026 and a com­par­i­son table of fea­tures and prices. Spe­cial atten­tion is paid to Work­sec­tion — a mod­ern solu­tion where all advanced tools are avail­able in every plan with no hid­den fees.

Why are users look­ing for alter­na­tives to Microsoft Project?

Despite its pow­er, Microsoft Project often does not meet the needs of work­flows in 2026. First­ly, licens­ing remains expen­sive: the cloud-based Project Plan 3 costs about $30 per user per month, while the per­pet­u­al ver­sion of Pro­fes­sion­al is sold for $1,129 per seat. Sec­ond­ly, mas­ter­ing the inter­face takes time and spe­cial­ized cours­es, delay­ing the pro­jec­t’s start. Third­ly, many teams work with agile meth­ods rely­ing on Kan­ban boards and instan­ta­neous task reorder­ing — capa­bil­i­ties that Microsoft Project does not pro­vide in its basic ver­sion. Final­ly, mod­ern cloud tools inte­grate more eas­i­ly with emails, mes­sen­gers, and finan­cial sys­tems, which is crit­i­cal­ly impor­tant for dis­trib­uted teams.

Cri­te­ria for choos­ing an alter­na­tive to Microsoft Project

Before choos­ing a plat­form, deter­mine the key requirements:
  • View flex­i­bil­i­ty. Kan­ban boards, Gantt charts, and cal­en­dars should be syn­chro­nized so that every­one sees the same data in a con­ve­nient format.
  • Imple­men­ta­tion speed. The ser­vice should launch in days, not weeks, with­out requir­ing exter­nal consultants.
  • Col­lab­o­ra­tion. Com­ments, file shar­ing, ver­sion con­trol, and detailed per­mis­sions allow for the secure involve­ment of clients and contractors.
  • Automa­tion and inte­gra­tions. Trig­gers, APIs, and web­hooks reduce man­u­al work and inte­grate Gmail, Slack, Jira, and finan­cial applications.
  • Cost. Trans­par­ent pric­ing with­out extra charges for basic tools (like Gantt or time track­ing) keeps TCO low.

Best alter­na­tives to Microsoft Project in 2026

Work­sec­tion

Work­sec­tion stands out by mak­ing every core mod­ule — kan­ban board, Gantt chart, cal­en­dar, and built-in time track­er — avail­able in every plan. This allows teams to save up to 30 – 50% of the bud­get, which is typ­i­cal­ly spent on pre­mi­um” add-ons in oth­er sys­tems. Cre­at­ing a task takes sec­onds: add a descrip­tion, dead­line, and assignee, and the task instant­ly appears on the kan­ban and in the Gantt chart. Each task con­tains com­ments, check­lists, files, and time logs. Flex­i­ble per­mis­sions allow invit­ing clients and show­ing them indi­vid­ual items. For teams of up to 20 users, the Team” plan costs $49/​month and includes every­thing. Ukrain­ian and Russ­ian sup­port speeds up onboard­ing, and the migra­tion wiz­ard imports projects from Microsoft Project in just min­utes. Work­sec­tion is the opti­mal choice for SMBs, dig­i­tal agen­cies, and prod­uct teams.

Click­Up

Click­Up offers a flex­i­ble struc­ture of Spaces → Fold­ers → Lists and allows for task com­bi­na­tions in almost any con­fig­u­ra­tion. Visu­al views include kan­ban, Gantt chart, cal­en­dar, mind-map, and work­load. Addi­tion­al fea­tures — Docs, if-then-lev­el automa­tions, exten­sive cus­tom field options, and built-in time track­er — add pow­er.The down­side is an over­loaded inter­face: new­com­ers need time to mas­ter the ter­mi­nol­o­gy and sys­tem log­ic. Nonethe­less, advanced Gantt chart capa­bil­i­ties, dash­board for­mu­las, and time ana­lyt­ics are bet­ter imple­ment­ed in the Busi­ness plan (approx­i­mate­ly from $19 per user per month with annu­al pay­ment). For teams that val­ue max­i­mum cus­tomiza­tion and are ready to invest time and bud­get in set­up, Click­Up can be a seri­ous alter­na­tive to Microsoft Project.

Wrike

Wrike posi­tions itself as an enter­prise plat­form with deep ana­lyt­ics and adapt­able work­spaces. Its strength is real-time report­ing and resource work­load dash­board, close­ly resem­bling Microsoft Project in func­tion­al­i­ty.The down­side is the high cost of advanced pack­ages: Busi­ness Plus with a Gantt chart, AI assis­tant, and OKR sys­tem costs from $34.90 per user per month. Addi­tion­al­ly, Russ­ian sup­port is only avail­able via email, which may slow down respons­es for teams in the CIS.Wrike is well-suit­ed for large depart­ments that require com­pre­hen­sive ana­lyt­ics and extend­ed access rights but may be exces­sive for small companies.

Mon​day​.com

Mon​day​.com fea­tures a bright visu­al inter­face that facil­i­tates the engage­ment of cre­ative and mar­ket­ing teams: col­ored sta­tus columns, activ­i­ties, and visu­al project sta­tus indi­ca­tors help quick­ly nav­i­gate tasks.
For com­plex depen­den­cies, it’s nec­es­sary to acti­vate the crit­i­cal path” and pre­de­ces­sors” fea­tures, which are avail­able in advanced plans (usu­al­ly Pro or high­er), where rel­e­vant plan­ning capa­bil­i­ties open up. Despite this, Mon​day​.com inte­grates well with Slack, Google Work­space, and Zapi­er, allow­ing it to serve as a sub­sti­tute for Microsoft Project when visu­al­iza­tion and col­lab­o­ra­tion are more impor­tant than strict hier­ar­chi­cal task structures.

Asana

Asana is known for its sim­plic­i­ty and intu­itive­ness: tasks are grouped into projects, and users can switch between views in list for­mat, kan­ban board, or timeline.
The Gantt chart (Time­line) appeared rel­a­tive­ly recent­ly and still lags behind Microsoft Project in terms of mul­ti-lev­el depen­den­cies. How­ev­er, for prod­uct teams and IT depart­ments where rapid re-pri­or­i­ti­za­tion is impor­tant, Asana remains a pow­er­ful task manager.
The free plan for 15 users pro­vides a quick start, while the Busi­ness lev­el (from $24.99 per user) adds project port­fo­lio and work­load man­age­ment capabilities.

Smartsheet

If the team is used to Excel, Smartsheet serves as a log­i­cal next step. The ser­vice appears as an online spread­sheet, where each row can be dis­played on a kan­ban board or Gantt chart. It sup­ports for­mu­las, inter-sheet links, and auto­mat­ic noti­fi­ca­tions — all of which sim­pli­fy data migra­tion from spread­sheets.The Pro plan costs about $9 per user, but for resource plan­ning and crit­i­cal path, one must upgrade to Busi­ness (approx­i­mate­ly $32 per user).The down­side is that the inter­face can become over­loaded with large vol­umes of data, and there is no Russ­ian-lan­guage UI in the service.

Notion + Timeline

Notion turns every page into a mini-data­base, and the time­line view pro­vides a sim­pli­fied Gantt chart. The advan­tage is com­plete cus­tomiza­tion: you can build a CRM, wiki, and task track­er all in one work­space.The weak point is the lack of a native time track­er and lim­it­ed task depen­den­cies. For small IT and con­tent teams need­ing a flex­i­ble knowl­edge base, Notion can serve as a good alter­na­tive to Microsoft Project, but for large projects, inte­gra­tions with exter­nal time track­ers and addi­tion­al tools for man­ag­ing depen­den­cies will be necessary.

Trel­lo (with Power-Ups)

Trel­lo remains the stan­dard for kan­ban boards: the sim­plic­i­ty of drag­ging cards makes it a con­ve­nient tool for a quick start. With Pow­er-Ups (plu­g­ins), one can add a Gantt chart, cus­tom fields, and But­ler automa­tion, expand­ing the basic func­tion­al­i­ty of the ser­vice. The free plan lim­its the num­ber of con­nect­ed Pow­er-Ups, while the Stan­dard plan ($5 per user) removes this restric­tion. How­ev­er, Trel­lo main­tains a strict ver­ti­cal mod­el of board – list – card,” which is poor­ly suit­ed for man­ag­ing com­plex depen­den­cies, resources, and large projects. There is no native sup­port for inter-task depen­den­cies and crit­i­cal path in Trel­lo — such sce­nar­ios are only pos­si­ble through third-par­ty plu­g­ins. There­fore, the ser­vice is more often used as a light­weight task man­ag­er for small teams rather than as a full alter­na­tive to Microsoft Project.


GanttPRO

GanttPRO focus­es on Gantt charts and is suit­able for teams that need to quick­ly build project log­ic: tasks, depen­den­cies, crit­i­cal path, and dead­lines can be adjust­ed in min­utes. The ser­vice sup­ports resource assign­ment and cost track­ing, allow­ing for a basic bud­get esti­mate of a project with­out a full finan­cial mod­ule. The inter­face is avail­able in Ukrain­ian and Russ­ian, and PDF/PNG export is con­ve­nient for reports and approvals. The price starts from $7.99 per user with annu­al pay­ment, mak­ing GanttPRO an acces­si­ble alter­na­tive to Microsoft Project for teams pri­mar­i­ly focused on work­ing with Gantt charts. How­ev­er, Agile approach­es are lim­it­ed: kan­ban rep­re­sen­ta­tion is aux­il­iary, and native Scrum mechan­ics (sprints, back­log, veloc­i­ty) are absent in the system.

Team­Gantt

Team­Gantt com­bines a sim­ple Gantt chart with a board view of tasks and is pri­mar­i­ly aimed at small teams. The free plan is designed for a lim­it­ed num­ber of active users and is suit­able for test­ing the ser­vice. Paid plans are billed by project man­agers and pro­vide access to resource work­load man­age­ment, guest par­tic­i­pants, and basic reports. Team­Gantt is con­ve­nient for agen­cies and ser­vice teams that need to quick­ly assem­ble a visu­al sched­ule and share it with clients. How­ev­er, the plat­form remains a tool with min­i­mal automa­tion and with­out deep process cus­tomiza­tion — unlike more uni­ver­sal sys­tems like Work­sec­tion or ClickUp.

Com­par­a­tive table of Microsoft Project alter­na­tives in 2026

Ser­viceKan­ban / BoardGantt ChartTime Track­erGuest / Client AccessTask Depen­den­ciesBasic Plan Cost*Suit­able For
Work­sec­tionYesYesYesYes (gran­u­lar)Yes$49 for a team of up to 20 peopleSMB, agen­cies, prod­uct teams
Click­UpYesYes (paid)Yes (lim­it­ed by plans)YesYesfrom $7 per userTeams with high customization
WrikeYesYesYes (paid)YesYesfrom $9.80 per userMedi­um and large businesses
Mon​day​.com
YesYes (paid plans)Yes (paid plans)YesYes (Pro+)from $8 per userMar­ket­ing, cre­ative, ops teams
AsanaYesTime­lineNo (through integrations)YesBasicFree / from $10.99IT and prod­uct teams
SmartsheetCard viewYesNoYesYes$9 per userSpread­sheet and oper­a­tional teams
NotionBoard (data­bas­es)Time­lineNoYesLim­it­ed$8 per userCon­tent and R&D teams
Trel­loYesVia Pow­er-UpsVia Pow­er-UpsYesLim­it­edFree / $5 per userSmall teams, startups
GanttPRONoYesYesPar­tial­lyYesfrom $7.99 per userPM spe­cial­ists, project offices
Team­GanttBoard viewYesYesYes (guests)Basicfrom $24 per project managerAgen­cies, ser­vice teams
*Prices are as of 2026 and may vary by region.

Which plat­form to choose in 2026?

The final choice depends on team size, bud­get, and the desired lev­el of flex­i­bil­i­ty. If you need an all-in-one tool with­out hid­den upgrades, Work­sec­tion pro­vides plan­ning, visu­al­iza­tion, time track­ing, and client access from day one.
Click­Up and Wrike are suit­able for com­pa­nies will­ing to invest time in deep cus­tomiza­tion. GanttPRO or Team­Gantt makes sense when the main require­ment is a clas­sic Gantt chart. And if the pri­or­i­ty is a clean kan­ban with a min­i­mal entry thresh­old, Trel­lo or Asana would be appropriate.

Fre­quent­ly Asked Ques­tions (FAQ)

What is the best alter­na­tive to Microsoft Project for small businesses?

For small busi­ness­es look­ing for a sim­ple and afford­able solu­tion, the best choice would be Work­sec­tion. It offers a trans­par­ent pric­ing mod­el with­out extra costs for basic fea­tures like Gantt charts or time track­ing. The plan for $49 per month cov­ers up to 20 users and includes all nec­es­sary tools for task man­age­ment, project plan­ning, and report­ing. Addi­tion­al­ly, Work­sec­tion has an intu­itive inter­face that requires lit­tle train­ing, allow­ing small teams to quick­ly get to work.

Are there free alter­na­tives to Microsoft Project?

Yes, there are sev­er­al free alter­na­tives suit­able for small teams or per­son­al use. Trel­lo offers a free plan with basic Kan­ban boards and the option to add func­tion­al­i­ty with Pow­er-Ups. Asana allows up to 15 users to work on a free plan with access to task lists, cal­en­dar, and basic automa­tions. Click­Up also has a free plan with most basic fea­tures, but some advanced capa­bil­i­ties, such as detailed reports or time track­ing, are only avail­able on paid plans. How­ev­er, it is impor­tant to note that free ver­sions usu­al­ly have lim­its on the num­ber of inte­gra­tions, stor­age capac­i­ty, and num­ber of users.

How does Work­sec­tion dif­fer from Microsoft Project?

Work­sec­tion dif­fers from Microsoft Project in sev­er­al key aspects. First, it has a sim­ple imple­men­ta­tion: the ser­vice can be launched in a few hours and does not require exten­sive train­ing or assis­tance from exter­nal con­sul­tants. Sec­ond, the cost — Work­sec­tion offers team-based pric­ing rather than per-user, which great­ly reduces the over­all cost for small and medi­um busi­ness­es. Third, Work­sec­tion has built-in time track­ing, kan­ban boards, and Gantt charts already includ­ed in the base plan, where­as Microsoft Project requires sep­a­rate pay­ments for sim­i­lar fea­tures or com­plex inte­gra­tions. Addi­tion­al­ly, Work­sec­tion sup­ports flex­i­ble access rights for clients and con­trac­tors, which is essen­tial for agen­cies and teams work­ing with exter­nal participants.

Con­clu­sion

Microsoft Project is still the indus­try stan­dard, but in 2026, the mar­ket offers more flex­i­ble and afford­able alter­na­tives. Click­Up, Wrike, and Asana meet the needs of larg­er and more tech-savvy teams. How­ev­er, if you are look­ing for a mod­ern plat­form with com­plete func­tion­al­i­ty, quick onboard­ing, and sup­port for the Russ­ian lan­guage, Work­sec­tion is a smart choice. Try it for free and see how much eas­i­er project man­age­ment can be.

esc
Share
или
PM school
Task managers have become an integral part of team work. According to data from Cloudwards, small businesses spend an average of $8.9 per user per month on such services, while the average spend is about...
9 September 2025   •   9 min read
PM school
Modern teams spend too much time on communication — not always effective. According to data from Grammarly, an average of 7.5 hours a week is wasted just exchanging information through chats, emails,...
27 August 2025   •   8 min read
PM school
Opacity of processes is one of the main reasons for chaos in teams. Managers spend time on endless status clarifications, employees work without understanding the full picture, and clients get lost in...
5 August 2025   •   9 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂