•     •   3 min read

Y&R Ukraine: How an international advertising agency grows in Ukraine

Y&R Ukraine in figures:

  • Its activ­i­ties com­menced in 2006;
  • 26+ employ­ees in 5 sections;
  • 19+ major com­pa­nies, includ­ing Danone, Microsoft, Col­gate, Life, Wat­sons, Obolon, IDS Bor­jo­mi Ukraine etc.;
  • 10 ad infini­tum of projects han­dled per month.


Hel­lo, my name is Dmytro Bar­sukov, I am the СЕО CEO of the Ukrain­ian divi­sion of the inter­na­tion­al adver­tis­ing agency Young & Rubicam.

When 1 – 3 per­sons are involved in work, they can sort things out between them­selves, jot­ting the details down in a note­book or in Google Docs. But when a lot of peo­ple take part in the process­es, with dif­fer­ent work­loads and lev­els of knowl­edge, you need a sys­tem. And that sys­tem has to be as user-friend­ly as pos­si­ble. It’s not peo­ple for the sys­tem, but the sys­tem for people.

What makes an adver­tis­ing agen­cy’s work distinctive

The nature of our work explains our com­plex struc­ture: the com­pa­ny is divid­ed into depart­ments, which, in turn, are divid­ed into sec­tions solv­ing par­tic­u­lar prob­lems. The num­ber of projects is an unsta­ble vari­able: any­where from 10 to count­less. We need­ed a set of tools for time track­ing and dead­line man­age­ment. That’s how we arrived at Worksection.

An agen­cy’s work can be lim­it­ed to one or two clients who order adver­tis­ing for a dozen brands. With Danone, for exam­ple, we worked on com­mer­cials for their brands Rastish­ka, Zhyvyn­ka, Pros­tok­vashyno, Aktimel, and Danissimo.
Time track­ing in the adver­tis­ing agency is the inter­na­tion­al stan­dard which (very hope­ful­ly for us) will become our nation­al stan­dard. The nature of the adver­tis­ing busi­ness is such that we’re essen­tial­ly sell­ing our spe­cial­ists’ time. Thus we ini­tial­ly use the sys­tem focused on time tracking.


Time track­ing lets us run two kinds of analysis:
  1. inter­nal — assess­ing how effi­cient­ly each employ­ee in a sec­tion or depart­ment works;
  2. exter­nal — assess­ing the cost of the work.


Impor­tance of time tracking

Back in 1998, there were already time-track­ing prod­ucts on the mar­ket. Con­ve­nience, of course, was out of the ques­tion back then. Para­dox­i­cal­ly, the time-track­ing sys­tems ate up more time than doing with­out them! But they’re still a pow­er­ful tool.

When it comes to work­ing with a client, track­ing the time spent lets you see how prof­itable that client is and makes the ser­vice more con­ve­nient for them.

It would be a per­fect solu­tion: bring the client into the project so they can check the scope of work at any time
We’ve brought only a few clients into the sys­tem. The rest can’t quite bring them­selves to, since few of them are inter­est­ed in the behind-the-scenes side of an adver­tis­ing project.

Data acqui­si­tion and analysis

One of the key dif­fer­ences between project man­age­ment of local and inter­na­tion­al com­pa­nies con­sists in soft­ware. Inter­na­tion­al com­pa­nies often devel­op it to suit them­selves”, with embed­ded mod­ules, includ­ing tim­ing. And for them the ques­tion of data col­lec­tion isn’t as press­ing. In such com­pa­nies, project man­age­ment = con­trol + plan­ning of imple­men­ta­tion. For us thought, what comes first is the abil­i­ty to track dynam­ics and work­ing time, and to use them to under­stand efficiency. 

As a result, once you’ve col­lect­ed time data over a long peri­od, you can work out how many hours — and there­fore how much mon­ey — a par­tic­u­lar task or project costs. 

It becomes clear that one per­son spends 10 hours on a task, while anoth­er employ­ee does a sim­i­lar one in just 2 hours.



Who would you rec­om­mend Work­sec­tion to?

First and fore­most, to large agen­cies — the ones that face a lot of tasks every day, split across the com­pa­ny’s key units (sec­tions, depart­ments). For com­pa­nies that need plan­ning and want to scale their busi­ness, it’s inevitable.

The big­ger the com­pa­ny is, the more unwieldy its process­es become. Thus, at this stage of devel­op­ment of Y&R Brands, we val­ue the ease of oper­at­ing Work­sec­tion even more than its functionality.
The ones Work­sec­tion def­i­nite­ly won’t suit are sin­gle-project” com­pa­nies that care less about results and growth than about how much bud­get they can carve up. 

We val­ue Work­sec­tion for:

  1. con­ve­nience of data acquisition;
  2. low adap­ta­tion threshold;
  3. the abil­i­ty to cus­tomize it for spe­cif­ic nature of any business.
An adver­tis­ing agency is a com­pa­ny whose main prod­uct is cre­ativ­i­ty. And until robots take over the cre­ative indus­tries, this remains a per­son-to-per­son” business.

Where peo­ple account for 85% of costs, Work­sec­tion is a vital product.


esc
Share
или
PM school
Wrike is a genuinely capable project management tool. That’s half the problem. Most teams that leave don’t leave because something broke. They leave because they spent three months configuring folder...
26 August 2026   •   22 min read
PM school
Atlassian finally put a date on it. Jira Data Center — the last self-hosted Jira you could actually buy — goes read-only on March 28, 2029, and the door to new data center subscriptions already shut for...
25 August 2026   •   23 min read
PM school
Communications within an organization serve at least two inseparable purposes. On one hand, without comfortable interaction, it is impossible to create a harmonious internal team environment. On the other...
2 August 2026   •   11 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂