•     •   3 min read

Y&R Ukraine: How an international advertising agency grows in Ukraine

Y&R Ukraine in figures:

  • Its activ­i­ties com­menced in 2006;
  • 26+ employ­ees in 5 sections;
  • 19+ major com­pa­nies, includ­ing Danone, Microsoft, Col­gate, Life, Wat­sons, Obolon, IDS Bor­jo­mi Ukraine etc.;
  • 10 ad infini­tum of projects han­dled per month.


Hel­lo, my name is Dmytro Bar­sukov, I am the СЕО CEO of the Ukrain­ian divi­sion of the inter­na­tion­al adver­tis­ing agency Young & Rubicam.

When 1 – 3 per­sons are involved in work, they can sort things out between them­selves, jot­ting the details down in a note­book or in Google Docs. But when a lot of peo­ple take part in the process­es, with dif­fer­ent work­loads and lev­els of knowl­edge, you need a sys­tem. And that sys­tem has to be as user-friend­ly as pos­si­ble. It’s not peo­ple for the sys­tem, but the sys­tem for people.

What makes an adver­tis­ing agen­cy’s work distinctive

The nature of our work explains our com­plex struc­ture: the com­pa­ny is divid­ed into depart­ments, which, in turn, are divid­ed into sec­tions solv­ing par­tic­u­lar prob­lems. The num­ber of projects is an unsta­ble vari­able: any­where from 10 to count­less. We need­ed a set of tools for time track­ing and dead­line man­age­ment. That’s how we arrived at Worksection.

An agen­cy’s work can be lim­it­ed to one or two clients who order adver­tis­ing for a dozen brands. With Danone, for exam­ple, we worked on com­mer­cials for their brands Rastish­ka, Zhyvyn­ka, Pros­tok­vashyno, Aktimel, and Danissimo.
Time track­ing in the adver­tis­ing agency is the inter­na­tion­al stan­dard which (very hope­ful­ly for us) will become our nation­al stan­dard. The nature of the adver­tis­ing busi­ness is such that we’re essen­tial­ly sell­ing our spe­cial­ists’ time. Thus we ini­tial­ly use the sys­tem focused on time tracking.


Time track­ing lets us run two kinds of analysis:
  1. inter­nal — assess­ing how effi­cient­ly each employ­ee in a sec­tion or depart­ment works;
  2. exter­nal — assess­ing the cost of the work.


Impor­tance of time tracking

Back in 1998, there were already time-track­ing prod­ucts on the mar­ket. Con­ve­nience, of course, was out of the ques­tion back then. Para­dox­i­cal­ly, the time-track­ing sys­tems ate up more time than doing with­out them! But they’re still a pow­er­ful tool.

When it comes to work­ing with a client, track­ing the time spent lets you see how prof­itable that client is and makes the ser­vice more con­ve­nient for them.

It would be a per­fect solu­tion: bring the client into the project so they can check the scope of work at any time
We’ve brought only a few clients into the sys­tem. The rest can’t quite bring them­selves to, since few of them are inter­est­ed in the behind-the-scenes side of an adver­tis­ing project.

Data acqui­si­tion and analysis

One of the key dif­fer­ences between project man­age­ment of local and inter­na­tion­al com­pa­nies con­sists in soft­ware. Inter­na­tion­al com­pa­nies often devel­op it to suit them­selves”, with embed­ded mod­ules, includ­ing tim­ing. And for them the ques­tion of data col­lec­tion isn’t as press­ing. In such com­pa­nies, project man­age­ment = con­trol + plan­ning of imple­men­ta­tion. For us thought, what comes first is the abil­i­ty to track dynam­ics and work­ing time, and to use them to under­stand efficiency. 

As a result, once you’ve col­lect­ed time data over a long peri­od, you can work out how many hours — and there­fore how much mon­ey — a par­tic­u­lar task or project costs. 

It becomes clear that one per­son spends 10 hours on a task, while anoth­er employ­ee does a sim­i­lar one in just 2 hours.



Who would you rec­om­mend Work­sec­tion to?

First and fore­most, to large agen­cies — the ones that face a lot of tasks every day, split across the com­pa­ny’s key units (sec­tions, depart­ments). For com­pa­nies that need plan­ning and want to scale their busi­ness, it’s inevitable.

The big­ger the com­pa­ny is, the more unwieldy its process­es become. Thus, at this stage of devel­op­ment of Y&R Brands, we val­ue the ease of oper­at­ing Work­sec­tion even more than its functionality.
The ones Work­sec­tion def­i­nite­ly won’t suit are sin­gle-project” com­pa­nies that care less about results and growth than about how much bud­get they can carve up. 

We val­ue Work­sec­tion for:

  1. con­ve­nience of data acquisition;
  2. low adap­ta­tion threshold;
  3. the abil­i­ty to cus­tomize it for spe­cif­ic nature of any business.
An adver­tis­ing agency is a com­pa­ny whose main prod­uct is cre­ativ­i­ty. And until robots take over the cre­ative indus­tries, this remains a per­son-to-per­son” business.

Where peo­ple account for 85% of costs, Work­sec­tion is a vital product.


esc
Share
или
Cases
Serhii Huzenko, CEO & Owner of Wezom, shared his experience of building his own company and working during the war, insights into organizing processes in Worksection, as well as advice on how to build...
22 July 2026   •   3 min read
Cases
Alina Kashapova, the leader and founder of Marketing Office, talked about the value of Worksection for the marketing team, the rules for working with clients and why it is important to learn to delegate...
12 July 2026   •   3 min read
Cases
The Pedan Buro agency helps create communication and media projects. The team consists of 15 in-house employees and about 10 contractors. In addition to commercial projects, the company runs its own social...
11 July 2026   •   4 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂