•     •   13 min read

Agile Methodology: The Mother of Dragons or All Flexible Methodologies

Agile’s his­to­ry roots back to the pub­li­ca­tion of “ The Man­i­festo for Agile Soft­ware Devel­op­men t ” con­sist­ing of 12 fun­da­men­tals in 2001. Undoubt­ed­ly, cer­tain setups of the Agile approach had appeared before that, but only this doc­u­ment sys­tem­ized and set them out to such extent which was suf­fi­cient for use. Year by year, new com­pa­nies, IT spe­cial­ists and project man­agers adhere to the Man­i­festo. New meth­ods and ver­sions of the agile devel­op­ment sys­tem emerge.

What is Agile (flex­i­ble) methodology?

Agile is an inter­ac­tive devel­op­ment mod­el in which soft­ware is cre­at­ed incre­men­tal­ly from the out­set of a project, in con­trast to the cas­cade mod­els where the code is deliv­ered at the end of the work cycle.

The flex­i­ble method­ol­o­gy is based upon break­down of projects into small oper­a­tional pieces called user sto­ries. Accord­ing to pri­or­i­ties, tasks are solved with­in short two-week cycles (iter­a­tions).

The 12 prin­ci­ples which con­sti­tute the Agile Method­ol­o­gy may be stream­lined into 4 main ideas:

  • Pri­or­i­ty of peo­ple and com­mu­ni­ca­tion over tools and processes;
  • Pri­or­i­ty of a func­tion­al prod­uct over abun­dant documentation;
  • Pri­or­i­ty of col­lab­o­ra­tion with cus­tomers over con­tract confirmation;
  • Pri­or­i­ty of readi­ness to changes over fol­low­ing the ini­tial plan.


Meth­ods inher­ent in Agile:

Scrum

The term of Scrum was bor­rowed from rug­by where this word means the method of team game in the form of three lines built by each rival attempt­ing to grasp the ball. For suc­cess­ful regrasp­ing, not only good phys­i­cal fit­ness is essen­tial – each scrum­ming play­er should act con­cert­ed­ly with oth­ers, with clear under­stand­ing of the goal. 

This method is suc­cess­ful­ly used by such com­pa­nies as Microsoft, Yahoo, Siemens Health­care. A project man­ag­er from Ama­zon even described a case of Scrum intro­duc­tion based on the expe­ri­ence acquired.

Since Scrum is a frame for devel­op­ment, each exam­ple that fol­lows may dif­fer from the pre­vi­ous one.


Jeff Suther­land, the author or the book Scrum. The Art Doing Twe­ice the Work in Half the Time”, dis­tin­guished 8 steps to use the methodology:

  1. Select the prod­uct own­er who is aware of the project goal and expect­ed outcome.
  2. Orga­nize a team — up to 10 per­sons with skills nec­es­sary to cre­ate an oper­a­tional product.
  3. Appoint the Scrum mas­ter who will super­vise the project work­flow and assist the project team in address­ing challenges.
  4. Make up prod­uct back­log — for each prod­uct require­ment, set up pri­or­i­ties on the Agile board. In this process, the prod­uct owner’s role is essen­tial, since he col­lects requests for the prod­uct for the back­log team to eval­u­ate them.
  5. Sched­ule sprints (iter­a­tions) — time frag­ments to com­plete def­i­nite chains of tasks.
  6. Arrange dai­ly fif­teen-minute mee­tups — ask each team mem­ber 3 ques­tions: what he did yes­ter­day, what he will do today, what impedes task fulfillment.
  7. Make reviews of oper­a­tional parts of the prod­uct — by involv­ing stake­hold­ers into such reviews.
  8. Hold ret­ro­spec­tives — prob­lem dis­cus­sion with search for solu­tions after each sprint. Imple­ment the result­ing mod­i­fi­ca­tion plan in the fol­low­ing sprint.

Ret­ro­spec­tive in Agile


Scrum has 4 key elements:

  • Prod­uct Back­log — list of require­ments for the project 
  • Sprint Back­log — list of require­ments to be ful­filled with­in the upcom­ing sprint 
  • Sprint Goal — sprint purpose
  • Sprint Burn­down Chart — the dia­gram which is updat­ed as tasks advance being com­plet­ed. It facil­i­tates the under­stand­ing of dynam­ics and the team’s advance­ment lev­el in the project.

eXtreme Pro­gram­ming (XP)

Kent Beck, the devel­op­er of this method­ol­o­gy, has cre­at­ed an extreme pro­gram­ming method tar­get­ed at address­ing volatile soft­ware prod­uct require­ments and improv­ing the qual­i­ty of development.

It is applic­a­ble only in the field of soft­ware devel­op­ment, and it is based upon 4 processes:

  1. cod­ing — accord­ing to the team’s com­mon lay­out standards;
  2. test­ing — tests are basi­cal­ly cre­at­ed by pro­gram­mers before writ­ing a code which will be tested;
  3. plan­ning — both for the final build and for sep­a­rate iter­a­tions. The lat­ter take place every two weeks on an average.
  4. audi­tion — of both devel­op­ers and a cus­tomer, to elim­i­nate unclear points and to define require­ments and values.


Crys­tal Methodologies

This fam­i­ly of method­olo­gies devel­oped by Alis­tair Cock­burn, one of the authors of The Man­i­festo for Agile Soft­ware Devel­op­ment” is lit­tle known in some local domains of project man­age­ment. Cock­burn offers to make clas­si­fi­ca­tion by col­ors, based on such cri­te­ri­on as the num­ber of per­sons in a team: 2 (Crys­tal Clear) to 100 (Crys­tal Red). The Maroon, Blue and Vio­let col­ors are assigned to more large-scale projects.

Crys­tal projects should con­form to 3 basic characteristics:
  1. swift deliv­ery of the oper­a­tional code — evolv­ing idea for the iter­a­tive mod­el in Agile development.
  2. improve­ment through reflex­ion — a new soft­ware ver­sion is improved based on the infor­ma­tion about the pre­vi­ous one.
  3. osmot­ic” inter­ac­tion — Alistair’s inno­va­tion, a metaphor for com­mu­ni­ca­tion and infor­ma­tion exchange between soft­ware devel­op­ers with­in one room.

This fam­i­ly of method­olo­gies is described in detail in the book Crys­tal Clear: A Human-Pow­ered Method­ol­o­gy for Small Teams” by Alis­tair.


Dynam­ic Soft­ware Devel­op­ment Method (DSDM)

Not just a sin­gle per­son, yet not even a team, but a con­sor­tium of 17 British com­pa­nies worked on DSDM devel­op­ment. As extreme pro­gram­ming, DSDS is used pre­dom­i­nant­ly to cre­ate software.

The end con­sumer (user) gets a spe­cial role in the devel­op­ment process. This core prin­ci­ple is sup­ple­ment­ed with the fol­low­ing basic ones:

  • fre­quent releas­es of the product’s oper­a­tional versions 
  • auton­o­my of devel­op­ers in deci­sion making
  • test­ing through­out the work cycle.
DSDM is sub­di­vid­ed into ver­sions which are updat­ed as tech­nolo­gies devel­op and as new soft­ware devel­op­ment require­ments appear. Cur­rent­ly the last one is DSDM Atern released in 2007, although the pre­vi­ous one (of 2003) is still in service.

At the out­set, the team con­sid­ers fea­si­bil­i­ty of devel­op­ing an appli­ca­tion and its scope of use. Then the work is divid­ed into three inter­con­nect­ed cycles:

  1. func­tion­al mod­el cycle — cre­at­ing ana­lyt­i­cal doc­u­ments and prototypes.
  2. design&engineering cycle — bring­ing a sys­tem into operation.
  3. imple­men­ta­tion cycle — sys­tem deployment.


Fea­ture Dri­ven Devel­op­ment (FDD)

This method­ol­o­gy emerged even ear­li­er than The Man­i­festo for Agile Soft­ware Development”.
Although FDD also employs the iter­a­tion mod­el of devel­op­ment, it dif­fers from Agile in the fol­low­ing features:

  • more atten­tion to up-front modeling 
  • increased (as com­pared with Agile) sig­nif­i­cance of plot­ting reports and charts 
  • the method­ol­o­gy is designed for cor­po­rate development.

Fea­ture Dri­ven Devel­op­ment con­sists of the fol­low­ing cyclic phases:

  1. Cre­at­ing a gen­er­al mod­el — vision of the project based on pre­lim­i­nary data.
  2. Devel­op­ing a list of prop­er­ties — sim­i­lar to prod­uct back­log in the Scrum methodology.
  3. Plan­ning by prop­er­ties — the com­plex­i­ty of prop­er­ties is eval­u­at­ed by each team member.
  4. For each prop­er­ty — tech­ni­cal design and imple­men­ta­tion – the final phase upon com­ple­tion of which the prop­er­ty merges into the prod­uct, and the cycle repeats.

Lean Soft­ware Development

Lean Soft­ware Devel­op­ment is a set of lean man­age­ment prin­ci­ples (rather than a method­ol­o­gy) which are tar­get­ed at increas­ing effi­cien­cy of the devel­op­ment process and at min­i­miz­ing costs.

This set includes the fol­low­ing 7 fundamentals:

  1. elim­i­nat­ing loss­es — every­thing that adds no val­ue to the prod­uct for the end consumer.
  2. con­tin­u­ous train­ing — ongo­ing devel­op­ment of a team enhances pos­si­bil­i­ties for effi­cient ful­fill­ment of tasks.
  3. mak­ing deci­sions as late as pos­si­ble — pri­or­i­ty is giv­en to delib­er­ate solu­tions which are well-devel­oped and based on acquired knowl­edge, rather than to spon­ta­neous ones.
  4. swift deliv­ery — this is basi­cal­ly the core prin­ci­ple of the iter­a­tive model.
  5. team rein­force­ment — one of the Man­i­festo…” fun­da­men­tals holds that peo­ple and their inter­ac­tions are more impor­tant than process­es and tools. A project team is the best guar­an­tee for suc­cess­ful com­ple­tion of tasks.
  6. integri­ty and qual­i­ty — it is nec­es­sary to make an orig­i­nal­ly high-qual­i­ty prod­uct not to waste time and resources on fur­ther test­ing and elim­i­na­tion of bugs.
  7. vision of an aggre­gate pic­ture — a project can­not be bro­ken down into sep­a­rate parts with­out under­stand­ing the cur­rent sta­tus of devel­op­ment, as well as the pur­pos­es, con­cept and strate­gies of the soft­ware developed.


Ver­sions of Agile devel­op­ment methodologies 

Agile Mod­el­ing (AM)

Agile Mod­el­ing is a set of val­ues, fun­da­men­tals and prac­tices for soft­ware modeling.
AM is used as an ele­ment in ful­ly-fledged soft­ware devel­op­ment method­olo­gies — for instance, in extreme pro­gram­ming or Rapid Appli­ca­tion Development.

Agile Mod­el­ing has the fol­low­ing fun­da­men­tal features:
  • effec­tive inter­ac­tion between project stakeholders;
  • striv­ing for devel­op­ing an ulti­mate­ly sim­ple solu­tion of all pos­si­ble ones, which will meet all requirements;
  • con­tin­u­ous receipt of feedback;
  • courage to make deci­sions and to be respon­si­ble for them;
  • real­iz­ing that you know absolute­ly everything.


Agile Uni­fied Process (AUP)

AUP is a sim­pli­fied ver­sion of anoth­er soft­ware devel­op­ment method­ol­o­gy — Ratio­nal Uni­fied Process (RUP). Since 2012, it was sub­sti­tut­ed by Dis­ci­plined Agile Deliv­ery (DAD), but AUP is still the case here and there.
Scott Ambler, the author of the method­ol­o­gy, high­light­ed the fol­low­ing key points in Agile Uni­fied Process:
  • Your team knows what is does;
  • Sim­plic­i­ty comes first.
  • Con­for­mi­ty to the fun­da­men­tals of the flex­i­ble devel­op­ment methodology.
  • Focus on activ­i­ties valu­able for the project.
  • Inde­pen­dence in selec­tion of tools.
  • Cus­tomized AUP con­fig­ur­ing for require­ments of a spe­cif­ic project.


Agile Data Method (ADM)

ADM is a set of iter­a­tive soft­ware devel­op­ment method­olo­gies which empha­size form­ing require­ments and solu­tions in a project through col­lab­o­ra­tion of dif­fer­ent teams. As AUP, this method­ol­o­gy is not self-con­tained either.

The prin­ci­ple of Agile Data Method is defined by six fundamentals:
  1. Data — the basis for cre­ation of any application.
  2. Prob­lems in a project — they may be detect­ed only if the project goal and con­cept are clear­ly understood.
  3. Work groups — apart from the basic team of devel­op­ers, there are enter­prise groups which sup­port oth­er work groups.
  4. Unique­ness — there is no per­fect method­ol­o­gy, so each project requires tools from dif­fer­ent method­olo­gies to be combined.
  5. Team work — joint work is much more effi­cient than indi­vid­ual activity.
  6. Sweet spot” — search for an opti­mal solu­tion of a prob­lem (“sweet spot”) by avoid­ing extremities.

Essen­tial Uni­fied Process (EssUP)

It was devel­oped by Ivar Jacob­son, a Swedish sci­en­tist, to improve Ratio­nal Uni­fied Process.


EssUP uses the con­cept of prac­tice which includes:

  • usage sce­nario — descrip­tion of a system’s behaviour.
  • iter­a­tion devel­op­ment — cre­ation of oper­a­tional pieces of the code in short cycles with­in a few weeks.
  • team prac­tices — tar­get­ed at ral­ly­ing the team and increas­ing its efficiency.
  • pro­ce­dur­al prac­tices — for instance, Think glob­al­ly, start small” or Involve stake­hold­ers into busi­ness processes”.
In one form or anoth­er, all prac­tices are present in the RUP and CMMI method­olo­gies, as well as in the flex­i­ble devel­op­ment methodology.

Get­ting Real (GR)

This is a method­ol­o­gy effec­tive for star­tups and start­ing teams, which sug­gests the max­i­mum use of spe­cif­ic fea­tures inher­ent in small projects and com­pa­nies, such as mobil­i­ty, flex­i­bil­i­ty, search for new solu­tions, absence of a strict and con­fused hier­ar­chy etc. 
Jason Fried and David Hans­son, founders of the 37signals Com­pa­ny (cur­rent­ly Base­camp), deter­mined Get­ting Real as a sys­tem for solv­ing fea­si­ble tasks, which is ulti­mate­ly sim­ple, com­pre­hen­sive and functional.

GR is a mix of a dozen of agile devel­op­ment tools which are used to min­i­mize the following:

  • alter­na­tives
  • options and settings
  • com­pa­ny structure
  • meet­ings
  • promis­es.
Such extra­or­di­nary con­cept has not gone main­stream, although some of its ele­ments have merged into oth­er methodologies. 

OpenUP (OUP)

This is a soft­ware devel­op­ment method­ol­o­gy inde­pen­dent of tools and free of strict struc­ture, which pro­vides such practices:

  • mea­sur­ing the team’s speed of operation;
  • hold­ing dai­ly meet­ings and ret­ro­spec­tives upon com­ple­tion of iterations;
  • con­cept of microsteps and ear­ly test­ing by using checklists;
  • method­ol­o­gy of Agile Mod­el Dri­ven Devel­op­ment (AMDD).
These prac­tices are real­ized based on four principles:

  1. rec­on­cil­i­a­tion of inter­ests and achiev­ing the com­mon vision in joint work;
  2. con­tin­u­ous improve­ment through ongo­ing feedback;
  3. focus­ing on the application’s archi­tec­ture at ear­ly stages to min­i­mize risks;
  4. max­i­miz­ing val­ue for the end consumer.




Agile Indi­ca­tors

Giv­en the diver­si­ty of Agile tools, prac­tices, meth­ods and method­olo­gies, we need to choose an instru­ment which will help us to deter­mine how each of them is effective. 
Met­rics are used as such instrument.

For most projects, these 4 met­ric cat­e­gories will be enough:

  1. Pro­duc­tiv­i­ty — it adjoins the Veloc­i­ty and WIP met­rics. The first one will suit not all projects, since the num­ber of tasks per­formed per iter­a­tion is mea­sured, but iter­a­tions are not equal. The Work-in-Progress met­ric defines the lim­it of tasks in dif­fer­ent phas­es: and the high­er it is, the worse it goes;
  2. Fore­cast­ing — the Capac­i­ty met­ric, which con­sists in deter­min­ing the num­ber of per­fect hours avail­able in the fol­low­ing sprint. Accord­ing­ly, it is pos­si­ble to under­stand the amount of time avail­able for work, the degree of effi­cien­cy in task ful­fill­ment, as well as to plan the num­ber of tasks for a sprint;
  3. Qual­i­ty — for instance, the require­ments sta­bil­i­ty index which is cal­cu­lat­ed by the for­mu­la = (Total num­ber of orig­i­nal busi­ness require­ments + Num­ber of require­ments altered by the time giv­en + Num­ber of added require­ments + Num­ber of sub­tract­ed require­ments) / (total num­ber of orig­i­nal require­ments). This met­ric is used to deter­mine the amount of time spent on re-work­ing tasks;
  4. Val­ues — this met­ric is com­put­ed indi­vid­u­al­ly in every case, depend­ing on the project for­mat. For exam­ple, in the AirBnb start­up, the num­ber of high-qual­i­ty pho­tos down­loaded was cho­sen as a met­ric deter­min­ing the end val­ue of the prod­uct for users. As this num­ber was increas­ing, the num­ber of users was grow­ing in proportion.
The rules applic­a­ble to the met­rics are the same as those for oth­er Agile tools.

There is no sin­gle met­ric which would be unique­ly cor­rect and rel­e­vant for your project.


Met­rics should be revised in an ongo­ing man­ner, out­dat­ed ones must be sub­tract­ed, and new ones must be added as nec­es­sary. It should be com­pre­hen­sive and avail­able for the whole team with­out being trans­formed into a goal in itself. Met­rics for the sake of met­rics are a bad solution.



Myth Busters: Agile

The pop­u­lar­i­ty of the flex­i­ble devel­op­ment method­ol­o­gy played a low-down trick with it, and myths about cer­tain aspects of Agile can be seen even on spe­cial­ized por­tals. Let’s sort them out!

Myth No.1: Agile will suit all projects.

This is the most assertive mis­con­cep­tion. Just a sin­gle Agile method in itself will add no val­ue to the prod­uct, nor will it moti­vate the team.

Myth No.2: Agile dis­fa­vors documentation.

The agile devel­op­ment method­ol­o­gy does not dis­fa­vor doc­u­men­ta­tion, it denies doc­u­men­ta­tion as a goal in itself. When it comes to select­ing doc­u­men­ta­tion as a means of com­mu­ni­ca­tion, Agile real­ly favors per­son­al communication.

Myth No.3: Agile and plan­ning are incompatible.

This myth is con­test­ed by dai­ly plan­ning events with 10-minute standups, as well as by iter­a­tion plan­ning tak­ing place every two weeks, sprint meet­ings etc.

Myth No.4: Agile requires a lot of re-work.

The agile soft­ware devel­op­ment method­ol­o­gy pro­vides for re-work in two forms: require­ments re-work (users fig­ure out what they real­ly need) and soft­ware re-work (teams of devel­op­ers find improved ways to write and design appli­ca­tions). But this is the case to be also encoun­tered in oth­er method­olo­gies! More­over, such Agile nov­el­ty as the iter­a­tion mod­el serves to reduce the neg­a­tive influ­ence of re-work.



Advan­tages and dis­ad­van­tages of Agile in use

Advan­tages:

  1. involv­ing stake­hold­ers — the team becomes more capa­ble to under­stand the customer’s require­ments. What is more, ear­ly and fre­quent deliv­ery of soft­ware enhances the trust of stake­hold­ers to the project team and makes engage­ment in the project more profound.
  2. ear­ly and pre­dictable deliv­ery — the iter­a­tion-based devel­op­ment mod­el (in short peri­ods last­ing for 1 to 6 weeks) pro­vides flex­i­bil­i­ty and prompts prod­uct release.
  3. focus on busi­ness val­ue — col­lab­o­ra­tion with the cus­tomer ensures that the team under­stands how to make the prod­uct ulti­mate­ly valu­able for the consumer.
  4. con­tin­u­ous qual­i­ty improve­ment — test­ing dur­ing each iter­a­tion with divi­sion of the final build into sep­a­rate parts of the oper­a­tional code facil­i­tate improve­ment and elim­i­na­tion of soft­ware errors before the final prod­uct is released.

Dis­ad­van­tages:

  • strict require­ments for the team and cus­tomers — with­out close inter­ac­tion between the project team and users, it is impos­si­ble to ensure release of a high-qual­i­ty prod­uct with high val­ue. What is more, abun­dant Agile tools and meth­ods pre­de­ter­mine that the team should be expe­ri­enced for their prop­er introduction.
  • not suit­able for out­source and for projects where par­tic­i­pants inter­act with each oth­er only in an online mode.
  • the risk that the final soft­ware ver­sion will nev­er be released — sur­pris­ing­ly, this dis­ad­van­tage aris­es from such Agile advan­tages as iter­a­tive devel­op­ment and ongo­ing improve­ment of the product.
  • it fails with­out clear vision of busi­ness pur­pos­es of the project — since an Agile team is guid­ed by stake­hold­ers, it is impos­si­ble to devel­op a prod­uct with­out a goal and con­cept clear­ly fig­ured out.

Appli­ca­tions

Not all project man­age­ment ser­vices or pro­grams will suit for Agile-based project man­age­ment, because each of them has its spe­cif­ic features. 

If your busi­ness is a marketing&advertising, design, seo or dig­i­tal agency, you may use the saas ser­vice from Work­sec­tion for the whole team to oper­ate on it. So far we are rec­om­mend­ed by COXO Dig­i­tal, Roy­al ® Adver­tis­ing and Prozorro.

Here are a cou­ple of life hacks to con­fig­ure Agile in Worksection:

  1. con­fig­ure tags and sta­tus­es which are nec­es­sary for work in your company.Statuses may be: in progress, check­up, done, re-work need­ed, crit­i­cal, fea­tures, pay­ment due.Tags often read like this: lay­out, test­ing, pro­duc­tion, con­cept, code.
  2. cre­ate project back­log and project spring.
  3. cre­ate tasks and pre­lim­i­nary check­lists, sketch­es etc. in the backlog.
  4. dur­ing mee­tups, deter­mine sprint tasks and trans­fer them from the back­log to the sprint. 
  5. use guest access of cus­tomers to tasks so that you always have coor­di­nat­ed and rel­e­vant feed­back on the project. 
  6. tag respon­si­ble per­sons in tasks for each col­league to know his area of respon­si­bil­i­ty and feel involved in the sprint outcome.




Ver­dict

Due to the agile soft­ware devel­op­ment method­ol­o­gy, small project teams gain max­i­mum effi­cien­cy. Agile real­izes itself through such oth­er flex­i­ble meth­ods as Scrum, XP, Lean etc.

It can­not be deployed hur­ried­ly, by an inex­pe­ri­enced team, with­in a short peri­od of time
but when intro­duced, Agile will improve the inter­ac­tion between IT and busi­ness­es, it will prompt prod­uct release into the mar­ket, and it will add prod­uct val­ue for the end consumer. 





esc
Share
или
Business-cases
The Arsenal Insurance team consists of about a thousand people with divisions all over Ukraine. The head office employs over 150 people in more than 10 departments — including lawyers, financiers, accountants...
26 January 2026   •   5 min read
PM school
Task managers have become an integral part of team work. According to data from Cloudwards, small businesses spend an average of $8.9 per user per month on such services, while the average spend is about...
9 September 2025   •   9 min read
PM school
Modern teams spend too much time on communication — not always effective. According to data from Grammarly, an average of 7.5 hours a week is wasted just exchanging information through chats, emails,...
27 August 2025   •   8 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂