•     •   5 min read

Review of David Anderson's "Kanban: The Alternative Path to Agile"

David Ander­son­’s book, Kan­ban,” cap­ti­vates from the first page. With illus­tra­tions, graphs, and con­clu­sions, Ander­son­’s con­cise biog­ra­phy unveils the Kan­ban method­ol­o­gy for fans of healthy project man­age­ment. Project man­age­ment becomes intrigu­ing when nar­rat­ed by the method­’s devel­op­er from a first-per­son perspective.

About the Author

Accord­ing to the offi­cial blog of his com­pa­ny, David J Ander­son is list­ed as the chair­man of Lean Kan­ban Inc. He has been a man­age­ment train­er and con­sul­tant since the 2000s and a con­fer­ence speak­er and host since 2005. Ander­son first held a man­age­r­i­al posi­tion in 1991, giv­ing him ample expe­ri­ence to hon­est­ly com­pare Kan­ban with Water­fall, Agile, Scrum, and oth­er project man­age­ment methodologies.

He cre­at­ed Kan­ban to ele­vate the lev­el of intel­lec­tu­al and cre­ative work. Ander­son­’s goals includ­ed time­ly deliv­ery, align­ment of work with set goals, and effec­tive man­age­ment of mod­ern com­pa­nies as a whole. Using real-life exam­ples from Microsoft, Motoro­la, and Cor­bis, he explained and demon­strat­ed the prin­ci­ples, meth­ods, and instruc­tions for imple­ment­ing Kan­ban in companies.

Con­tent and Essence of the Book

Kan­ban: The Alter­na­tive Path to Agile” is writ­ten by the per­son who invent­ed Kan­ban. The book is both inter­est­ing and infor­ma­tive, reveal­ing the fine line between the Kaizen phi­los­o­phy (con­tin­u­ous improve­ment), Lean method­ol­o­gy (lean pro­duc­tion), and Kan­ban (a method for con­serv­ing human and mate­r­i­al resources).

Kaizen: A phi­los­o­phy and ethics of rela­tion­ships between fac­to­ry work­ers and administration.
Lean Pro­duc­tion: A project man­age­ment sys­tem cre­at­ed at Toy­ota to elim­i­nate all time and resource waste from com­pa­ny processes.
Kan­ban: A project man­age­ment method that lim­its the num­ber of simul­ta­ne­ous tasks. If there are lim­it­ed peo­ple, tools, or time, Kan­ban helps dis­trib­ute tasks and projects.
Sig­nif­i­cant­ly influ­enced by the The­o­ry of Con­straints, Ander­son­’s book exten­sive­ly cov­ers WIP lim­its, bot­tle­necks, and the abil­i­ty to hon­est­ly deter­mine the max­i­mum work­load per unit of time while main­tain­ing opti­mal quality.

The The­o­ry of Con­straints, devel­oped by Dr. Eliyahu Gol­dratt, is a man­age­ment method­ol­o­gy for man­u­fac­tur­ing busi­ness­es. Gol­drat­t’s sys­temic approach to iden­ti­fy­ing con­straints in com­pa­nies helps stream­line every­thing. Accord­ing to Gol­drat­t’s expe­ri­ence, the com­pa­ny’s pol­i­cy often becomes the pri­ma­ry constraint.
WIP Lim­it (Work in Progress): The num­ber of tasks that can be open simultaneously.
Bot­tle­neck: A point in the work­flow where there is a seri­ous con­straint on resources or capa­bil­i­ties. On dia­grams, it resem­bles the nar­row neck of a bot­tle, with lines widen­ing before and after such a situation.

Stereo­types about Kanban

When we hear about Kan­ban, we often imag­ine a board with sticky notes — a stereo­type per­pet­u­at­ed by the media. Sym­bol­i­cal­ly, there’s a list of open, ongo­ing, and com­plet­ed tasks on the wall. Vir­tu­al walls and project man­age­ment soft­ware can be used, where task lists, pri­or­i­ties, and oth­er nuances are entered.

In this method­ol­o­gy, Kan­ban is not just a board or sticky notes but a process of con­trol­ling and trans­fer­ring tasks on the wall. Ander­son explains who moves the stick­ers, why, and how many can be kept in the in-progress” col­umn and why lim­it­ing this num­ber is important.
Kan­ban is not a board with sticky notes; sticky notes are mere­ly indi­ca­tors of workload. 
Ander­son devel­oped Kan­ban to pre­vent start­ing new projects before com­plet­ing the pre­vi­ous ones. For exam­ple, if a devel­op­er can han­dle 3 – 5 tasks at a time, they can only take on a new task after fin­ish­ing one.

Agile, Scrum, and Kanban

Ander­son believes that Agile and Scrum method­olo­gies are rigid and tem­plat­ed. In his view, project man­age­ment should be indi­vid­u­al­ized for each com­pa­ny. There­fore, Agile and Scrum, with their stan­dard­ized action algo­rithms, are out­dat­ed, much like the clas­si­cal step-by-step Water­fall method­ol­o­gy. Kan­ban, on the oth­er hand, adapts to a com­pa­ny’s unique fea­tures, which can be intim­i­dat­ing for Agile method­ol­o­gy advocates.

Agile: A flex­i­ble method­ol­o­gy that his­tor­i­cal­ly start­ed soft­ware devel­op­ment in the for­mat of rolling out updates every few months. Iter­a­tions of a few weeks for each fea­ture accel­er­ate devel­op­ment and reduce risks.
Scrum: Anoth­er flex­i­ble method­ol­o­gy with short iter­a­tions and sig­nif­i­cant con­trol over the pro­gram­ming process. There are sprints — time seg­ments with spe­cif­ic tasks to com­plete. They are strict­ly lim­it­ed. There are back­logs — lists of tasks that are dis­trib­uted by the prod­uct own­er. The prod­uct own­er is not part of the devel­op­ment team but sets task priorities.
Waterfall: A clas­sic project man­age­ment mod­el with a strict sequence of actions. It’s often explained with the anal­o­gy of build­ing con­struc­tion from foun­da­tion to roof.

Lit­er­ary Quality

Reviews of the Eng­lish orig­i­nal of David Ander­son­’s Kan­ban” are sim­i­lar: every­one men­tions that the author explains:
  • How the method was cre­at­ed, why, and with whom it was developed.
  • Who ben­e­fits from it and who absolute­ly needs it.
  • How to apply it to achieve results.
Per­son­al­ly, while review­ing David Ander­son­’s Kan­ban,” I found sev­er­al use­ful guides for both com­pa­ny and per­son­al use — time man­age­ment in fam­i­ly life is very necessary. 

Kan­ban” is writ­ten in the man­ner of good busi­ness lit­er­a­ture. It includes con­clu­sions at the end of each chap­ter, and all chap­ters indi­vid­u­al­ly address every pos­si­ble ques­tion a read­er might have in a log­i­cal order.

Chap­ter 20, Prob­lem Man­age­ment and Esca­la­tion Rules,” par­tic­u­lar­ly struck me. Dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing a bot­tle­neck from a blocked task is obvi­ous, but how often do we mis­take one for the oth­er and try to push through a dead end? If a task can’t be solved now, address its root cause. Here’s a quote from the book:
A blocked task indeed forms a bot­tle­neck that restricts flow. How­ev­er, it is not the same as the bot­tle­neck described in Chap­ter 17 because it is not a resource con­straint and not a resource wait­ing for access. Sim­i­lar­ly, a cork is not a bot­tle­neck. To restore the flow of liq­uid from the bot­tle, sim­ply remove the cork.”

Ver­dict

Def­i­nite­ly worth read­ing, it will be ben­e­fi­cial for:
  1. Entre­pre­neurs strug­gling to man­age increas­ing pro­duc­tion rates.
  2. IT com­pa­ny direc­tors dis­sat­is­fied with Scrum.
  3. Senior man­agers and team leaders.
  4. Mar­keters obsessed with KPIs but unsure of their effectiveness.
  5. Start­up teams need­ing to do every­thing right from the start with­out rein­vent­ing the wheel,” in code, life, and projects.

Dis­agree with our opin­ion or have some­thing to add? Leave your review of David Ander­son­’s Kan­ban” in the com­ments, and we’ll con­sid­er and sup­ple­ment the article!

esc
Share
или
PM school
Time is ticking, budgets won’t wait, and your team might be spread across different time zones. This is a familiar situation for any company where precise time tracking is critical. Clockify remains a...
20 June 2025   •   8 min read
PM school
Linear has long earned a reputation as a fast, uncluttered issue-tracker loved by developers for its clean interface and handy shortcuts. Still, by 2025 many teams need more flexibility, richer visualization...
20 June 2025   •   7 min read
PM school
For years GanttPRO was viewed as the “gold standard” of visual planning, yet in 2025 companies increasingly look for a GanttPRO alternative that offers more flexible pricing, richer collaboration, and...
20 June 2025   •   7 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂