•   8 min read

Agile or Waterfall: which option fits your business better?

The oppo­si­tion of Agile and Water­fall is not as much the­o­ret­i­cal as it is prac­ti­cal. The choice of method­ol­o­gy that does not fit your project will, in the best-case sce­nario, slow down its devel­op­ment or, at worst, will send it to the Major Fails of the Year” list. Flex­i­ble and cas­cad­ing design of project devel­op­ment (Agile и Water­fall respec­tive­ly) — is one of the most pop­u­lar man­age­ment methodologies. 

Hav­ing exam­ined your project’s fea­tures and hav­ing armed your­selves with the knowl­edge from this arti­cle, you will be able to con­fi­dent­ly answer the fol­low­ing ques­tion: What will fit my busi­ness bet­ter — Agile or Waterfall?”

Agile — sys­tem of ideas and flex­i­ble” project man­age­ment prin­ci­ples that serve as a basis for oth­er pop­u­lar meth­ods, such as Scrum, Kan­ban, and oth­ers. The key prin­ci­ple is the devel­op­ment through short iter­a­tions (cycles), and at the end of each of such cycles, the client (user) is get­ting a work­ing code or product.

Water­fall — project man­age­ment method that implies sequen­tial order from one stage to anoth­er with­out any­thing being skipped and with no return to pre­vi­ous stages. 

What is Agile

Like oth­er pop­u­lar project devel­op­ment and man­age­ment method­olo­gies, Agile emerged com­par­a­tive­ly recent­ly in the USA. Unlike CPM and CCPM, a whole group of peo­ple, 17 Amer­i­can IT-spe­cial­ists from the state of Utah, is respon­si­ble for the emer­gence of this flex­i­ble devel­op­ment method­ol­o­gy. Along with the Flex­i­ble devel­op­ment of soft­ware Man­i­festo”, where the term Agile” was first intro­duced, they came up with 12 prin­ci­ples of Agile-development.

The essence of these prin­ci­ples boils down to the fol­low­ing key prin­ci­ples that define the char­ac­ter of the flex­i­ble devel­op­ment method:


  1. Peo­ple and col­lab­o­ra­tion are more impor­tant than process­es and tools.
  2. Work­ing prod­uct is more impor­tant than com­pre­hen­sive documentation.
  3. Coop­er­a­tion with the client is more impor­tant than nego­ti­at­ing the contract’s terms.
  4. Being ready to face changes is more impor­tant than fol­low­ing the ini­tial plan. 

Agile became the basis for the whole array of flex­i­ble meth­ods like Scrum, Lean, and
extreme pro­gram­ming (XP), to name a few. 

Scrum — the method­ol­o­gy of flex­i­ble devel­op­ment based on Agile, which is based on the sprint” — a peri­od from 1 to 4 weeks, after which a work­ing ver­sion of a prod­uct should be obtained.

Lean — method that grew on the basis of Toy­ota Pro­duc­tion Sys­tem. Its fun­da­men­tals are a phi­los­o­phy of con­stant improve­ment at all lev­els of the orga­ni­za­tion, where one of the key notions is — val­ue (what the client is ready to pay for).

Extreme Pro­gram­ming (XP) — one of the Agile-meth­ods where an impor­tant role is giv­en to the peri­od­ic plan­ning game involv­ing the client. It allows to find out all the flaws of the pre­vi­ous inte­gra­tion, tasks pri­or­i­ty, and desired prod­uct func­tion­al­i­ty with the client’s wish­es tak­en into consideration. 

Advan­tages and dis­ad­van­tages of the Agile method

Advan­tages include:

  • Short and clear iter­a­tions — devel­op­ment cycles last from 2 weeks to 2 months at the end of which the client gets the work­ing ver­sion of a product.
  • High degree of exec­u­tives’, man­agers’, and clients’ involvement.
  • The work­ing prod­uct is at the fore­front as the main progress indi­ca­tor — this­can be viewed both as good and bad since it requires high demands to the selfmanagement.

Water­fall turned out the same way as many oth­er inven­tions: Her­bert Ben­ning­ton in 1956 and Hosier in 1961 con­tributed to the devel­op­ment of the method­ol­o­gy while Walk­er used their work secur­ing the name of the Water­fall Cre­ator”. As they say, win­ners are not to bejudged…
Water­fall devel­op­ment mod­el involves the sequen­tial pas­sage of the process, divid­ed into stages. Tran­si­tion to a new stage is pos­si­ble only after the com­ple­tion of the pre­vi­ous one.




In the orig­i­nal work of Walk­er Man­ag­ing the devel­op­ment of large soft­ware sys­tems,” 6 stages of prod­uct devel­op­ment are described. These 6 stages were secured in the stan­dards of work with soft­ware devel­op­ers in 1985 by the US Depart­ment of Defense:


  1. Sys­tem and pro­gram require­ments: are secured in PRD (prod­uct require­ments document).
  2. Analy­sis: embod­ied in mod­els, schemes, and business-rules.
  3. Design: inter­nal soft­ware archi­tec­ture is being devel­oped with ways to imple­ment the require­ments. This is not only about the inter­face and appear­ance of the soft­ware but also about its inter­nal struc­tur­al logic. 
  4. Cod­ing: pro­gram code is writ­ten direct­ly; soft­ware inte­gra­tion is in progress.
  5. Test­ing: Bug testers (testers) check the final prod­uct by enter­ing infor­ma­tion about defects in the pro­gram code or func­tion­al­i­ty into the track­ers. In case of errors and time/​money avail­abil­i­ty, bug fix­es occur.
  6. Oper­a­tions: the prod­uct adapts to dif­fer­ent oper­at­ing sys­tems, is reg­u­lar­ly updat­ed to fix bugs found by users and to add func­tion­al­i­ty. The stage also pro­vides tech­ni­cal sup­port to customers.

The Toy­ota com­pa­ny that had made the Lean and Kan­ban meth­ods pop­u­lar used cas­cad­ing soft­ware devel­op­ing mod­el till the end of 2000‑s for pro­duc­tion needs.

Advan­tages and Dis­ad­van­tages of Waterfall

The biggest advan­tages of Water­fall are:

  • Clear and sim­ple struc­ture of devel­op­ment process — it reduces the entry thresh­old for teams
  • easy report­ing — you can eas­i­ly keep track of resources, risks, time and mon­ey spent thanks to the strict phas­ing of the devel­op­ment process and detailed doc­u­men­ta­tion of the project
  • task sta­bil­i­ty — the tasks that the prod­uct faces are clear to the team from the very begin­ning of devel­op­ment and remain unchanged through­out the entire process
  • Esti­ma­tion of the cost and dead­lines for the project — the tim­ing of the fin­ished prod­uct as well as its total cost can be cal­cu­lat­ed before the start of development.

Dis­ad­van­tages of the cas­cad­ing method include:

  • a process that lacks flex­i­bil­i­ty – in oth­er words, if a project hap­pens to require more time and finan­cial resources than had been ini­tial­ly allowed, then the whole test­ing phase goes to sham­bles. Accord­ing to research by the Roth­man con­sult­ing group, the cost of fix­ing bugs after a prod­uct is released is on aver­age 20 times high­er than dur­ing full-fledged mul­ti-step test­ing dur­ing the devel­op­ment process
  • resis­tance” to changes — the rigid frame­work of the devel­op­ment stages and the con­di­tion that only the fin­ished prod­uct is pro­vid­ed deter­mine that it is impos­si­ble to make adjust­ments dur­ing the development
  • iner­tia — in the ear­ly stages, the fore­cast of time and finan­cial expens­es may change upwards, but it is impos­si­ble to change the project towards opti­miz­ing costs and improv­ing the func­tion­al­i­ty or con­cept before the release of the fin­ished product
  • increased risk — the clas­sic test­ing sys­tem implies test­ing each com­po­nent of the project sep­a­rate­ly (includ­ing test­ing com­po­nents in coop­er­a­tion with oth­ers). When using Water­fall, the fin­ished prod­uct is tested.

Par­tial­ly the draw­backs of the water­fall devel­op­ment mod­el are cor­rect­ed in the Water­fall mod­i­fi­ca­tions: Sashi­mi, Water­fall with sub­pro­jects, and the water­fall devel­op­ment mod­el with risk-reduc­ing feature.


Sashi­mi or water­fall mod­el with over­lap­ping phas­es is the most famous among them. As in the orig­i­nal method, its stages fol­low each oth­er but at the same time over­lap one anoth­er in time.

Water­fall with sub­pro­jects is a mod­el in which you work with three large blocks: con­cep­tu­al­iza­tion, require­ments design, and archi­tec­tur­al struc­ture of the prod­uct. Then for each of them, you go through the stages (sub­pro­jects) of detailed design, cod­ing, and test­ing. At the end, all com­po­nents are inte­grat­ed dur­ing the sys­tem test­ing phase.

Water­fall devel­op­ment mod­el with the risk reduc­tion com­po­nent is a mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the clas­sic Water­fall, in which risk reduc­tion spi­rals are added, which divide the project into mini-projects and cor­re­spond to one or sev­er­al key risks.



 
Com­par­i­son Table 
 Agile Water­fall
Essence Flex­i­ble devel­op­ment mod­el based on iter­a­tive principles Cas­cad­ing devel­op­ment sys­tem based on strict sequen­tial devel­op­ment process
Date Cre­at­ed 2001 1956, 1961, and 1970
Appli­ca­tion principles
  • The high­est pri­or­i­ty of the client satisfaction 
  • Through­out the entire project, both the team and the client are in close col­lab­o­ra­tion with one another 
  • Work­ing prod­uct is the main progress indicator 
  • The work can only be trust­ed to self-orga­nized moti­vat­ed team 
  • Opti­mal time­frame of the work­ing prod­uct release – from 2 weeks to 2 months.
  • Strict sequence of devel­op­ment stages
  • The next step comes only after the suc­cess­ful com­ple­tion of the pre­vi­ous one
  • Fixed prod­uct cost
  • The client is not direct­ly involved in the devel­op­ment process
  • Changes can be imple­ment­ed only after the whole devel­op­ment process.
Advan­tages
  1. High lev­el of inter­ac­tion between project team members 
  2. Quick result (work­ing code) at the end of sprints” 
  3. Stim­u­lat­ing change and improve­ment of the prod­uct dur­ing its development 
  4. Direct involve­ment of the client in the work process.
  1. Clear and user­friend­ly scheme of the work process 
  2. The pos­si­bil­i­ty of cal­cu­lat­ing the exact costs spent on the project 
  3. Does not require com­mu­ni­ca­tion costs between all the team members.
Dis­ad­van­tages
  • Risk of end­less changes to the product 
  • High depen­den­cy on team’s lev­el of qual­i­fi­ca­tion and experience 
  • Almost impos­si­ble to cal­cu­late the final cost of the product.
  • Pri­or­i­ty to the for­mal approach to the sequen­tial work process 
  • Client can­not make changes until the end of the prod­uct development 
  • In case of lack of resources, qual­i­ty of the prod­uct is affect­ed due to test­ing stage reduction.
Clients Unilever, a num­ber of banks (Alfa Bank, Home Cred­it, Raif­feisen­bank, etc.) Cis­co Eric­s­son AB, Toy­ota (till 2010)
It will work for you if…
  1. High­ly-expe­ri­enced and high­ly-qual­i­fied team is work­ing on the project.
  2. You are work­ing on a startup.
  3. You need to get a work­ing ver­sion of the prod­uct fast.
  4. Client acts as a part­ner and not an investor.
  5. The prod­uct is being devel­oped in the envi­ron­ment where con­stant change is happening.
  1. The biggest part or the entire workis per­formed outsourcing 
  2. You have a clear con­cept of the prod­uct you would like to get 
  3. You are not lim­it­ed in time or resources for prod­uct development
  4. Cre­at­ing a prod­uct or build­ing a busi­ness is based strict­ly on fol­low­ing sequen­tial taskcompletion.
It will not work for you if…
  • You are not ready to spend addi­tion­al resources on estab­lish­ing dai­ly sta­ble com­mu­ni­ca­tion between all the process participants 
  • the prod­uct needs to be devel­oped by a cer­tain deadline 
  • project’s bud­get is limited 
  • you need detailed doc­u­men­ta­tion for all devel­op­ment processes.
  • You wish to cre­ate an inno­v­a­tive prod­uct or a large project 
  • You are not sure about the con­cept of the project offered 
  • Finan­cial resources are not the key lim­i­ta­tions in your project.

Ver­dict

Agile и Water­fall — two com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent meth­ods of devel­op­ment and project man­age­ment. Each of them has gen­er­at­ed dozens of mod­i­fi­ca­tions and meth­ods, sharp­ened” for a spe­cif­ic project format.

The flex­i­ble mod­el will be ide­al for ITcom­pa­nies, start-ups, and projects in inno­v­a­tive areas The cas­cade mod­el does not lose ground in con­struc­tion projects or projects where the key con­straint is the time­frame of the project rather than finance

Tak­ing into con­sid­er­a­tion the specifics of each of the meth­ods and your busi­ness along with risk cri­te­ria, time, and involve­ment of stake­hold­ers, you will be able to inde­pen­dent­ly deter­mine an effec­tive methodology.

esc
Share
или
PM school
How to organize work with customers or freelancers is a challenge that affects every size business. After all, the success of a project is determined by the ability to manage communication not only within...
20 May 2024   •   8 min read
PM school
A well-defined strategic plan is essential and acts as a roadmap, steering organizations through challenges, fostering adaptability, and capitalizing on opportunities. Creating a strategy ensures proactive...
15 May 2024   •   18 min read
PM school
This is the second part of our material on the strategic planning process. Follow the link to read from the beginning. And if you have already done so, welcome to the next part! Phase 2: Developing Strategy...
15 May 2024   •   13 min read
Get started now
Please enter your real email 🙂