•   8 min read

Can't see who is working on what and at what stage the tasks are? Worksection 2.0 helps keep everything under control.

The man­ag­er is ask­ing about the project. What is usu­al­ly done in such cas­es? First, you need to check the task man­ag­er, then recall that some­thing was dis­cussed in Slack, and then check if the file the client is wait­ing for is ready. It turns into an inves­ti­ga­tion of who did what, where, and how, ulti­mate­ly lead­ing to confusion.

A study by ZIP­DO revealed an inter­est­ing fact: 78% of projects face infor­ma­tion frag­men­ta­tion, reduc­ing team pro­duc­tiv­i­ty by about 30%. Addi­tion­al­ly, 60% of delays are not due to the work itself, but because it’s unclear who is doing what and who is respon­si­ble for what.

Trans­paren­cy is cru­cial. When it’s clear at any moment what has been done, what is in progress, and where delays may arise. With­out this, the team spends time not on work, but on fig­ur­ing out sta­tus­es and priorities.

We’ve ensured that in Work­sec­tion 2.0, all of this is vis­i­ble at once. Dash­boards, change his­to­ry, Kan­ban, Gantt charts, and reports show the cur­rent state of the project with­out man­u­al infor­ma­tion gath­er­ing and addi­tion­al requests. Each par­tic­i­pant sees the data they need, while the team works with an up-to-date view of the project in real time.

Where do these ques­tions come from every day?

Ini­tial­ly, the team sim­ply gets used to it, think­ing, Well, it’s some­where, we’ll sort it out lat­er.” Some­one hasn’t updat­ed the sta­tus, some­one for­got to write in the chat that they fin­ished, and it seems like noth­ing ter­ri­ble until these lit­tle things” accu­mu­late to the point where no one under­stands what is actu­al­ly hap­pen­ing with the project.


Data is scattered

Tasks in one tool, dis­cus­sions in Slack, files in Google Dri­ve. To under­stand what stage the project is at, every­thing needs to be col­lect­ed man­u­al­ly. A man­ag­er can­not quick­ly answer a sim­ple ques­tion, a new par­tic­i­pant strug­gles to fig­ure out what’s what, and progress seems unpre­dictable, though in real­i­ty, it’s just disorganized.

Man­u­al control

Instead of work­ing, the team reports what has already been done. The man­ag­er writes clar­i­fi­ca­tions, con­ducts sta­tus meet­ings, and gath­ers reports man­u­al­ly. This dis­tracts from work and cre­ates a sense of con­stant oversight.

The client can­not see the progress

With­out access to up-to-date infor­ma­tion, the client is forced to con­stant­ly check the sta­tus. This leads to more calls, less trust, and the impres­sion that some­thing is being hid­den, when in fact, there’s just nowhere to look.

A team with­out a holis­tic view

When it’s unclear how indi­vid­ual tasks influ­ence the out­come, pri­or­i­ties get lost. This leads to dupli­cat­ed work, over­looked depen­den­cies, and even expe­ri­enced par­tic­i­pants make mis­takes due to a lack of context.

How easy is it to con­trol every­thing in Work­sec­tion 2.0?

Gath­er­ing updates about the project man­u­al­ly is prob­a­bly the most tedious thing you can think of. There­fore, in Work­sec­tion 2.0, we’ve changed this log­ic a bit; now the sys­tem pulls and visu­al­izes every­thing hap­pen­ing in devel­op­ment itself.

View every­thing at once with per­son­al­ized dashboards

Instead of both­er­ing the team with calls every morn­ing ask­ing about the sta­tus of tasks, you can just open the main page. In Work­sec­tion 2.0, the dash­board shows each per­son exact­ly what they need for their work: a prod­uct man­ag­er sees over­all progress and dead­lines, a devel­op­er sees their tasks for today, and a man­ag­er sees the over­all sta­tus of all projects.

The work­space is assem­bled from dis­tinct blocks – wid­gets. You can add them, remove them, rearrange them, or adjust fil­ters to see only use­ful information.



For task man­age­ment, there is a con­ve­nient block Tasks”. Here, all your tasks or your team’s tasks are col­lect­ed. The advan­tage is that you can change the sta­tus, switch assignees, or move dead­lines direct­ly from this screen with­out need­ing to go into each task.



Quick­ly sort­ing out dead­lines is made easy with the wid­get Pri­or­i­ties”. The sys­tem itself iden­ti­fies the most impor­tant tasks across all projects and divides them by colors:
  • crit­i­cal:
  • impor­tant
  • nor­mal
In the morn­ing, it’s imme­di­ate­ly clear what to start the day with.


Track­ing the team’s work­load is aid­ed by the activ­i­ty graph. It shows who worked on tasks and when through­out the week. This makes it clear if some­one is over­whelmed with work while oth­ers have time to help their colleagues.


The glob­al pic­ture of the com­pa­ny is shown by the wid­get Projects”. Here, you can see all active or paused projects with progress indi­ca­tors. You can quick­ly assess what per­cent­age of work has been com­plet­ed for each one.


And if it’s impor­tant for you to keep track of every change, there’s the wid­get Events”. It shows the most recent actions on the project in chrono­log­i­cal order. You will imme­di­ate­ly see if some­one left a com­ment, changed a task’s sta­tus, or uploaded a new file, and you can eas­i­ly jump to the rel­e­vant task.


All this data updates auto­mat­i­cal­ly, so you no longer have to col­lect sta­tus­es man­u­al­ly. Plus, we’ve made sure that most quick actions can be done right from the main screen.

There’s a his­to­ry of changes – no more Who changed the deadline?”

In project work, there’s one truth – things are con­stant­ly chang­ing. Dead­lines shift, new assignees are added, tasks are moved to dif­fer­ent stages, and so on. The prob­lem aris­es because after a week, no one remem­bers why such deci­sions were made in the first place. The con­text sim­ply gets lost.

In Work­sec­tion 2.0, you won’t have to rely on mem­o­ry. The sys­tem auto­mat­i­cal­ly records every­thing from the moment a task is cre­at­ed to any changes in sta­tus­es, pri­or­i­ties, respon­si­ble per­sons, or added files. Com­ments and even time-track­ing records are stored here as well.

For this, there’s a Activ­i­ty” tab in each task block. Every­thing is list­ed in a clear chrono­log­i­cal order – what changed, when, and who did it.


This great­ly sim­pli­fies life for the entire team. For exam­ple, if a new per­son joins the project, they don’t need to run around ask­ing about every­thing. It’s enough to just look at the his­to­ry to under­stand the entire con­text of the work. And most impor­tant­ly, unnec­es­sary argu­ments dis­ap­pear in the team, as every deci­sion is record­ed and can be eas­i­ly verified.

How Kan­ban and Gantt charts help to see cur­rent tasks and plans?

When there are too many tasks, every­one tends not to cel­e­brate. In a plain list, it’s hard to quick­ly deter­mine what is real­ly mov­ing and what is sim­ply stuck in place.

The Kan­ban board shows all work in real time. Tasks are orga­nized in columns Planned”, In Progress”, or Await­ing Approval”. The team imme­di­ate­ly sees the cur­rent state of affairs. If plans change, the sta­tus or assignee can be updat­ed direct­ly on the board by sim­ply drag­ging the card. This helps notice in time where work is pil­ing up and who in the team is overwhelmed.



While Kan­ban shows what is hap­pen­ing now, the Gantt chart helps to under­stand what will hap­pen next.

Tasks in a project are usu­al­ly inter­con­nect­ed and fol­low one anoth­er. If one dead­line is extend­ed, oth­ers auto­mat­i­cal­ly shift, but this is hard to notice in a gen­er­al list. On the Gantt time­line, all these con­nec­tions are vis­i­ble at once.

You see the dura­tion of each task and how the project’s progress aligns with the ini­tial plan. If any stage is delayed, the sys­tem high­lights the risks, allow­ing you to adjust dead­lines or redis­trib­ute efforts before prob­lems with dead­lines arise. As a result, every­one under­stands the work prin­ci­ple, and the man­ag­er sees the over­all pic­ture and acts proactively.

Count­ing actu­al time with time track­ing and reports

Explain­ing to a client or man­age­ment where the week of work went is much eas­i­er when you have exact num­bers rather than approx­i­mate esti­mates. How­ev­er, recall­ing and record­ing hours post-fac­tum is a whole dif­fer­ent story.

And to avoid hav­ing this sep­a­rate con­ver­sa­tion and oth­er issues, in Work­sec­tion 2.0, we made it so that time is record­ed right dur­ing the work on the task. The assignee sim­ply starts the built-in timer or adds worked hours man­u­al­ly, pro­vid­ing a brief com­ment. The infor­ma­tion is imme­di­ate­ly saved with­in the task card. As a result, you clear­ly see how many hours a spe­cif­ic task con­sumed and who worked on it.


When it comes to the end of a project, data col­lec­tion usu­al­ly begins from all over the place to com­pile at least some report. In Work­sec­tion 2.0, there’s no need to com­pile every­thing man­u­al­ly, as the sys­tem auto­mat­i­cal­ly gath­ers all record­ed hours into under­stand­able charts.


You can gen­er­ate a report in just a few min­utes to review the total num­ber of hours for the project, com­pare the planned time to the actu­al, or assess the work­load of each team par­tic­i­pant. This kind of report is easy to export and show to the client, thus elim­i­nat­ing all unnec­es­sary ques­tions about where the bud­get went.

Show­ing the client what they need through the Guest” role

Of course, shar­ing work progress with the client is right, but show­ing them all drafts, finan­cial details, or inter­nal cor­re­spon­dence with var­i­ous dis­cus­sions is def­i­nite­ly not advisable.
How­ev­er, with­out a sense of con­trol, the client will feel anx­ious and may not always trust. And that’s fair, which is why we found a bal­ance by giv­ing con­trol with­out allow­ing it to inter­fere with the team’s work.

In Work­sec­tion 2.0, this is set up through the Guest” role. You decide which part of the project to open. The client will be able to access the sys­tem, see approved tasks, cur­rent sta­tus­es, dead­lines, and final files. They can leave com­ments direct­ly in the task con­text, but all inter­nal process­es: tech­ni­cal tasks, finances, time-track­er notes, and pure­ly team chats remain invis­i­ble to them.


More­over, this also saves a ton of time. The client no longer needs to ask about the project dai­ly, as they can log in at any moment and see the progress for them­selves. The team can calm­ly do their job, main­tain inter­nal dia­logues, with­out being dis­tract­ed by end­less sta­tus updates.

Bring­ing order to tasks with a tab­u­lar view

A reg­u­lar task list can be use­ful for improv­ing team work, but what if there are hun­dreds of tasks? The list becomes lengthy, noth­ing is clear, and every­thing gets lost. We shouldn’t let our­selves sink” into this chaos.

That’s why we cre­at­ed a tab­u­lar view. It gath­ers all tasks into an under­stand­able grid that helps quick­ly ori­ent your­self when you need to scan the entire array of tasks at a glance. You cus­tomize the columns, group tasks by dead­lines, assignees, or statuses.


If you need to update dates or reas­sign tasks to anoth­er col­league, there’s no need to open each card sep­a­rate­ly. All changes can be made direct­ly in the table cells, just like in reg­u­lar Excel. This saves a lot of time when you need to quick­ly tidy up a large vol­ume of work.

You can work even better

The worst part is when half the day goes not to work, but to clar­i­fi­ca­tions like who is doing this” and where is it locat­ed.” This is exhaust­ing for both the team and the managers.

Work­sec­tion 2.0 is exact­ly what’s need­ed to elim­i­nate all unnec­es­sary clut­ter. When sta­tus­es, change his­to­ry, and dead­lines are open and clear, the need to ping each oth­er in mes­sen­gers every hour or gath­er anoth­er call for thir­ty min­utes just to find out the sta­tus of a task disappears.

And it leads to a sim­ple sto­ry, where there’s less mess, less dupli­ca­tion, and much more peace to just do your job.

Switch to Work­sec­tion 2.0 and see how it feels to work with­out unnec­es­sary headaches.


esc
Share
или
Cases
Serhii Huzenko, CEO & Owner of Wezom, shared his experience of building his own company and working during the war, insights into organizing processes in Worksection, as well as advice on how to build...
22 July 2026   •   3 min read
Cases
Alina Kashapova, the leader and founder of Marketing Office, talked about the value of Worksection for the marketing team, the rules for working with clients and why it is important to learn to delegate...
12 July 2026   •   3 min read
Cases
The Pedan Buro agency helps create communication and media projects. The team consists of 15 in-house employees and about 10 contractors. In addition to commercial projects, the company runs its own social...
11 July 2026   •   4 min read